“The sad, proud old man stared eternally out of his canvas...”: Media Criticism, Scopic Regimes and the Function of Rembrandt’s “Self-Portrait with Two Circles” in John Fowles’s Novel Daniel Martin

Stefan Horlacher 1
  • 1 TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Stefan Horlacher

Abstract

On the surface level, Fowles’s novel sets the trust in the timelessness of art and the possibility of a recourse to some kind of ‘true self’ against American hyperreality. Though the novel’s verdict on the American scopic regime of simulacra is devastating, England’s morbid theatricality does not represent an alternative. However, a novel which criticizes visuality only to accord Rembrandt’s “Self-Portrait” a place of utmost importance necessarily runs into problems of self-contradiction: Rembrandt’s self-portrait refuses any one-dimensional functionalization and contains self-reflexive/revocative elements pertaining to its capitalist dimension and to the dangers of commodification/narcissism/serialization. Moreover, Rembrandt’s portrait is located at the centre of a whole series of mises en abyme and contains significant autotelic elements which link it with the criticized American scopic regime, question its representational dimension by stressing the pure materiality of the work of paint and revoke Fowles’s novel and its didactic media-theoretical underpinnings.1

Footnotes

1

I would like to thank Bryan Knowlton, Simon Loesch, Keith Hollingsworth and Bettina Jansen for their constructive help at various stages of work on this article.

  • [Abbreviations used in the text are given behind the individual titles.]

  • Alpers, Svetlana. 1976. “Describe or Narrate? A Problem in Realistic Representation”. New Literary History: A Journal of Theory and Interpretation 8.1: 15–41.

  • Alpers, Svetlana. 1983. The Art of Describing: Dutch Art in the Seventeenth Century. Chicago, MI. University of Chicago Press.

  • Alpers, Svetlana. 1988. Rembrandt’s Enterprise: The Studio and the Market. Chicago, MI: University of Chicago Press.

  • Bal, Mieke. 1990. “Review of Rembrandt’s Enterprise”. The Art Bulletin 72.1: 138–143.

  • Bal, Mieke. 2006. Reading Rembrandt: Beyond the Word-Image Opposition. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1988 a. The Ecstasy of Communication. Trans. Bernard Schütze and Caroline Schütze. Semiotext(e)/Foreign Agents. New York: MIT Press.

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1988 b. “Fatal Strategies”. In: Jean Baudrillard. Selected Writings. Ed., with an Introduction by Mark Poster. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 185–206.

  • Baudrillard Jean. 1991. Die Fatalen Strategien. München: Matthes & Seitz.

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1993 a. “Is an image not fundamentally immoral? Interview with Cinéma 84”. In: Mike Gane (ed.). Baudrillard Live: Selected Interviews. London/New York: Routledge. 67–71.

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1993 b. “Games with Vestiges”. Interview with Salvatore Mele and Mark Titmarsh. In: Mike Gane (ed.). Baudrillard Live: Selected Interviews. London/New York: Routledge. 81–95.

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1993 c. “I like the Cinema”. Interview with C. Charbonnier. In: Mike Gane (ed.). Baudrillard Live: Selected Interviews. London/New York: Routledge. 29–35.

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1993 d. America. 6th ed. London/New York: Verso.

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1994. Simulacra and Simulation. Trans. Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

  • Berger, Harry jr. 2000. Fictions of the Pose: Rembrandt Against the Italian Renaissance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Boomsma, Patricia J. 1980–1981. “‘Whole Sight’: Fowles, Lukács, and Daniel Martin”. Journal of Modern Literature 8: 325–336.

  • Broos, B. P. J. 1971. “The ‘O’ of Rembrandt”. Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art 4.3: 150–184.

  • Bryant, Julius. 2003. Kenwood, Paintings in the Iveagh Bequest. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.

  • Carrier, David. 1988. “Review of Rembrandt’s Enterprise”. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 46.4: 521–522.

  • Chapman, H. Perry. 1990. Rembrandt’s Self-Portraits. A Study in Seventeenth-Century Identity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  • Chittick, Kathryn A. 1985. “The Laboratory of Narrative and John Fowles’s Daniel Martin”. English Studies in Canada 11.1: 70–81.

  • Cichoń, Anna and Edward Szynal. 1999. “Re-discovering Europe: Daniel Martin’s Narrative”. In: Zbigniew Białas and Wiesław Krajka (eds.). East-Central European Traumas and a Millenial Condition. Boulder/Lublin: University of Michigan Press. 247–267.

  • Clarke, Jean-Marie. 2006/2013. “Full Circle”. Issued by The Rembrant [sic] Search Party: Anatomy of a Brand Name. <http://www.rembrandt-signature-file.com/remp_front.htm> [accessed 01 July 2017].

  • Cork, Richard. 2014. “A Portrait of the Artist as an Old Man: The Death of Loved Ones and Poverty Battered Rembrandt’s Spirit—But Not His Creativity”. The Wall Street Journal 24; <http://www.wsj.com/articles/masterpiece-rembrandts-self-portrait-with-two-circles-1414187690> [accessed 01 September 2017].

  • Fawkner, Harald William. 1984. The Timescapes of John Fowles. London/Cranbury, NJ: Farleigh Dickinson University Press.

  • Fowles, John. 1977/1989. Daniel Martin. London: Picador/Pan Books. [DM]

  • Fowles, John. 1993. The Aristos. Revised Edition. London/Basingstoke: Picador/Pan Books.

  • Gane, Mike. 1991. Baudrillard’s Bestiary: Baudrillard and Culture. London/New York: Routledge.

  • Grivel, Charles. 1990. “Der siderale Körper: Zum Prinzip der Kommunikation”. In: Jochen Hörisch and Michael Wetzel (eds.). Armaturen der Sinne – Literarische und technische Medien 1870 bis 1920. München: Fink. 177–199.

  • Hall, James. 2014. The Self-Portrait: A Cultural History. London: Thames & Hudson.

  • Hirschfelder Dagmar. 2008. Tronie und Porträt in der niederländischen Malerei des 17. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: Gebr. Mann.

  • Horlacher, Stefan. 1998. Visualität und Visualitätskritik im Werk von John Fowles. Tübingen: Narr.

  • Horlacher, Stefan. 2000a. “Wege zum Leben – Wege zur Kunst: Intertextuelle Überlegungen zu John Fowles’ Novelle ‘The Ebony Tower’ unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von D. H. Lawrence und Friedrich Nietzsche”. Anglia 118.3: 374–404.

  • Horlacher, Stefan. 2000b. “Zur Bedeutung der Internationalen Gotik für John Fowles’ Novelle ‘The Ebony Tower’: Pisanello, Uccello und die Darstellung der Natur”. Anglistik: Mitteilungen des Deutschen Anglistenverbandes 11.2: 90–112.

  • Horlacher, Stefan. 2004. “Daniel Martin, America, Faith in Fakes/Travels in Hyperreality und das Verschwinden der Realität – Überlegungen zum antizipatorischen Potential von Literatur”. In: Stefan Horlacher, Stefan Glomb (eds.). Beyond Extremes: Reflexion und Repräsentation von Modernisierungsprozessen im zeitgenössischen britischen Roman . Tübingen: Narr. 291–329.

  • Jones, Jonathan. 2013. “Is this the Greatest Painting in Britain?” The Guardian November 21: <https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2013/nov/21/rembrandt-kenwood-self-portrait-best-painting-britain> [accessed 01 July 2017].

  • Judge, Jenny. 2014 “Rembrandt’s Lessons for the Selfie Era: Why We Must Learn to Look Again”. The Guardian October 16: <https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/oct/16/rembrandt-selfie-era-self-portrait> [accessed 01 August 2018].

  • Kefalea, Circe. 1995. “The Literary Alphabet of John Fowles”. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 20.1: 133–145.

  • Kellner, Douglas. n.d. “‘Baudrillard: A New McLuhan?’ Illuminations: The Critical Theory Project”. Issued by UCLA. <https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/Illumina%20Folder/kell26.htm> [accessed: 04 February 2017].

  • Kellner, Douglas. 1991. Jean Baudrillard: From Marxism to Postmodernism and Beyond. 2nd ed. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

  • Kochhar-Lindgren, Gray. 1993. Narcissus Transformed: The Textual Subject in Psychoanalysis and Literature. Literature & Philosophy. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1984. Das Auge und der Geist : Philosophische Essays. Ed. and trans. by Hans Werner Arndt. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

  • Monaco, James. 1981. How to Read a Film: Movies, Media, and Beyond. Revised Edition. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Nash, J. M. 1989. “Speculating on Rembrandt”. Art History 12.2: 233–240.

  • Olshen, Barry N. 1978. John Fowles. New York: Ungar.

  • Onega, Susana. 1989. Form and Meaning in the Novels of John Fowles. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

  • Parmentier, Michael. 1997. “Das gemalte Ich. Über die Selbstbilder von Rembrandt”. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 43.5: 721–737.

  • Porter, Jeanne Chenault. 1988. “Rembrandt and His Circles: More about the Late Self-Portrait in Kenwood House”. In: Roland E. Fleischer and Susan Scott Munshower (eds.). The Age of Rembrandt: Studies in Seventeenth-Century Dutch Painting. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. 189–212.

  • Raupp, Hans-Joachim. 1993. “Der alte Künstler und das Alterswerk”. In: Ursel Berger and Jutta Desel (eds.). Bilder vom alten Menschen in der niederländischen und deutschen Kunst 1550–1750, Ausstellung im Herzog-Anton-Ulrich-Museum Braunschweig vom 14. Dezember 1993 bis 20. Februar 1994. Herzog-Anton-Ulrich-Museum Braunschweig. 87–97.

  • Reder, Hillary. 2015. “Serial & Singular: Andy Warhol’s Campbell’s Soup Cans”. Issued by INSIDE/OUT. A MoMA/MoMA PS1 BlOG, 29 April: <https://www.moma.org/explore/inside_out/2015/04/29/serial-singular-andy-warhols-campbells-soup-cans/> [accessed 20 January 2017].

  • Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn. 1665–69. “Self-Portrait with Two Circles”. Oil on canvas. Kenwood House, London. Wikimedia Commons. <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rembrandt_Self_Portrait_with_Two_Circles.jpg> [accessed 02 October 2018].

  • Siegal, Nina. 2015. “With Rembrandt, the Selfie Takes On New Meaning”. The New York Times April 16: <https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/17/arts/international/with-rembrandt-the-selfie-takes-on-new-meaning.html> [accessed 01 August 2018].

  • Silver, Larry. 1989. “Review of Rembrandt’s Enterprise”. The American Historical Review 94.5: 1409–1410.

  • Small, Andrew. 1996. Essays in Self-Portraiture: A Comparison of Technique in the Self-Portraits of Montaigne and Rembrandt. New York: Peter Lang.

  • Sooke, Alastair. 2014. “Did Rembrandt Invent the Selfie?” BBC Culture October 09: <http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20141009-did-rembrandt-invent-the-selfie> [accessed 01 July 2017].

  • Suthor, Nicola. 2014. Rembrandts Rauheit: Eine phänomenologische Untersuchung. Paderborn: Fink.

  • Temple-Thurston, Barbara. 1984. “Time: The Tensional Nature of Reality in John Fowles’ Daniel Martin”. Anglo-American Studies 4.1: 51–57.

  • Vieth, Lynne S. 1991. “The Re-Humanization of Art: Pictoral Aesthetics in John Fowles’s The Ebony Tower and Daniel Martin”. Modern Fiction Studies 37.2: 217–233.

  • Wilson, Raymond J. III. 1995. “Overcoming Reification in Daniel Martin: John Fowles’s Response to Georg Lukács”. The Journal of Narrative Technique 25.3: 301–319.

  • Winkgens, Meinhard. 1988. Die kulturkritische Verankerung der Literaturkritik bei F. R. Leavis. Paderborn: Schöningh.

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 1989. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London: Verso.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

A renowned journal of English philology, Anglia was founded in 1878 by Moritz Trautmann and Richard P. Wülker. It is thus the oldest journal of English Studies in existence. Anglia publishes essays on the English language and linguistic history, on English literature of the Middle Ages and the modern period, on American literature, on new literatures in English, as well as on general and comparative literary studies.

Search