The effects of user comments on hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experiences when watching online videos

A. Marthe Möller
  • Corresponding author
  • Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
and Rinaldo Kühne
  • Amsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar

Abstract

Videos presented on social media platforms are frequently watched because people find them entertaining. However, videos on social media platforms are often presented together with user comments containing information about how entertaining previous viewers found them to be. This social information may affect people’s entertainment experiences. The goal of the present study was to explore how user comments affect viewers’ hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experiences in response to online videos. The results of an online experiment (N = 203) showed that user comments in which previous viewers of a video indicate that they enjoyed or appreciated the video increase the hedonic entertainment experiences of new viewers. Viewers’ eudaimonic entertainment experiences were unaffected by user comments. These findings show that entertainment experiences do not emerge in response to online videos alone. Instead, they also depend on information about the entertainment experiences of previous viewers.

  • Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.

  • Baek, H., Oh, S., Yang, H.-D., & Ahn, J. (2017). Electronic word-of-mouth, box office revenue and social media. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 22, 13–23.

  • Bartsch, A. (2012). As time goes by: What changes and what remains the same in entertainment experience over the life span? Journal of Communication, 62, 588–608.

  • Bartsch, A., & Hartmann, T. (2017). The role of cognitive and affective challenge in entertainment experience. Communication Research, 44(1), 29–53.

  • Brand, B. (2013). Life is Beautiful. [Animated short film]. Available from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fDoTmjHa1l.

  • Cameron, J., & Geidner, N. (2014). Something old, something new, something borrowed from something blue: Experiments on dual viewing TV and Twitter. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(3), 400–419.

  • Chakravarty, A., Liu, Y., & Mazumdar, T. (2010). The differential effects of online word-of-mouth and critics’ reviews on pre-release movie evaluation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24, 185–197.

  • Chau, C. (2010). YouTube as a participatory culture. New Directions for Youth Development, 128, 65–74.

  • Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461–470.

  • Geise, S., & Baden, C. (2015). Putting the image back into the frame: Modeling the linkage between visual communication and frame‐processing theory. Communication Theory, 25(1), 46–69.

  • Hall, A., & Zwarun, L. (2012). Challenging entertainment: Enjoyment, transportation, and need for cognition in relation to fictional films viewed online. Mass Communication and Society, 15(3), 384–406.

  • Hixson, T. K. (2005). Mission possible: Targeting trailers to movie audiences. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 14(3), 210–224.

  • Hsueh, M., Yogeeswaran, K., & Malinen, S. (2015). “Leave your comment below”: Can biased online comments influence our own prejudicial attitudes and behaviors? Human Communication Research, 41(4), 557–576.

  • Khan, M. L. (2017). Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236–247.

  • Klaaren, K. J., Hodges, S. D., & Wilson, T. D. (1994). The role of affective expectations in subjective experience and decision-making. Social Cognition, 12(2), 77–101.

  • Konijn, E. A., & Hoorn, J. F. (2004). Reality-based genre preferences do not direct personal involvement. Discourse Processes, 38(2), 219–246.

  • Lee, J., Park, D. H., & Han, I. (2008). The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(3), 341–352.

  • Lee, M., & Youn, S. (2009). Electronic word of mouth (eWOM): How eWOM platforms influence consumer product judgement. International Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 473–499.

  • Leshner, G. (2017). Experiment, laboratory. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods (pp. 1–15). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

  • Lewis, R. J., Tamborini, R., & Weber, R. (2014). Testing a dual-process model of media enjoyment and appreciation. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 397–416.

  • Liu, Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 74–89.

  • Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2011). Appreciation of entertainment. Journal of Media Psychology, 23(1), 29–33.

  • Oliver, M. B., Weaver, J. B., & Sargent, S. D. (2000). An examination of factors related to sex differences in enjoyment of sad films. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 155–174.

  • Pew Research Center (2018). Who uses Pinterest, Snapchat, YouTube and WhatsApp: % of U.S. adults who use each social media platform. Retrieved March 6, 2018 from http://www.pewinternet.org/chart/who-uses-pinterest-snapchat-youtube-and-whatsapp/.

  • Potter, W. J. (2009). Arguing for a general framework for mass media scholarship. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences (pp. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

  • Rieger, D., Reinecke, L., Frischlich, L., & Bente, G. (2014). Media entertainment and well-being-linking hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experience to media-induced recovery and vitality. Journal of Communication, 64(3), 456–478.

  • Roth, F. S., Weinmann, C., Schneider, F. M., Hopp, F. R., Bindl, M. J., & Vorderer, P. (2017). Curving entertainment: The curvilinear relationship between hedonic and eudaimonic entertainment experiences while watching a political talk show and its implications for information processing. Psychology of Popular Media Culture. Advance online publication.

  • Shedlosky-Shoemaker, R., Costabile, K. A., Deluca, H. K., & Arkin, R. M. (2011). The social experience of entertainment media: Effects of others’ evaluations on our experience. Journal of Media, 23(3), 111–121.

  • Slater, D. M., Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Message variability and heterogeneity: A core challenge for communication research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 39(1), 3–31.

  • Sparks, J. R., Areni, C. S., & Cox, K. C. (1998). An investigation of the effects of language style and communication modality on persuasion. Communications Monographs, 65(2), 108–125.

  • Stangor, C., & Ruble, D. N. (1989). Strength of expectancies and memory for social information: What we remember depends on how much we know. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 18–35.

  • Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434–445.

  • Sundar, S. S. (2008). Self as source: Agency and customization in interactive media. In E. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis & S. Barnes (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 58–74). New York, NY: Routledge.

  • Tal-Or, N. (2016). How co-viewing affects attitudes: The mediating roles of transportation and identification. Media Psychology, 19, 381–405.

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243.

  • Valkenburg, P. M., & Piotrowski, J. T. (2017). Plugged in: How media attract and affect youth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Voigt, C., Howat, G., & Brown, G. (2010). Hedonic and eudaimonic experiences among wellness tourists: An exploratory enquiry. Annals of Leisure Research, 13(3), 541–562.

  • Waddell, T. F., & Sundar, S. S. (2017). # thisshowsucks! The overpowering influence of negative social media comments on television viewers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61(2), 393–409.

  • Walther, J. B., Deandrea, D., Kim, J., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of antimarijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36(4), 469–492.

  • Winter, S., Krämer, N. C., Benninghoff, B., & Gallus, C. (2018). Shared entertainment, shared opinions: The influence of social TV comments on the evaluation of talent shows. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 62(1), 21–37.

  • Wirth, W., Hofer, M., & Schramm, H. (2012). Beyond pleasure: Exploring the eudaimonic entertainment experience. Human Communication Research, 38, 406–428.

  • Xia, L., & Bechwati, N. N. (2008). Word of mouse. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 9(1), 3–13.

  • Zillich, A. F. (2014). Watching television with others: The influence of interpersonal communication on entertainment. Communications, 39(2), 169–192.

  • Zillmann, D., Weaver, J. B., Mundorf, N., & Aust, C. F. (1986). Effects of an opposite-gender companion’s affect to horror on distress, delight, and attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(3), 586–594.

  • Zwick, W. R., & Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99(3), 432.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Price including VAT
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


Journal + Issues

The European Journal of Communication Research is an established forum for scholarship and academic debate in the field of communication science and research from a European perspective. Communications highlights the concerns of communication science through the publication of articles, research reports, review essays and book reviews on theoretical and methodological developments considered from a European perspective.

Search