The effects of metaphorical frames on attitudes: The Euro crisis as war or disease?

Willem Joris, Leen d’Haenens and Baldwin Van Gorp

Abstract

Previous research has identified the frames and metaphors used in the reporting on the Euro crisis. War and disease turned out to be the two most frequently used metaphorical frames. Since coverage of the current financial crisis may have a tangible effect on public opinion, research into the effects of metaphorical frames on attitudes is needed. By employing two survey experiments, a student sample (N = 259) and a nonstudent sample (N = 507), this article traces the effects of both metaphorical frames. Our results show that individuals take over the metaphorical frame elements in their evaluation of the Euro crisis. Participants in the war conditions significantly more often referred to war when answering the open questions. Alternatively, when the Euro crisis was framed as a disease, participants were more likely to use words and sentences containing disease frame elements.

  • Aalberg, T., & Curran, J. (2012). How media inform democracy: A comparative approach. London: Routledge.

  • Authers, J. (2012). Europe’s financial crisis: A short guide to how the Euro fell into crisis and the consequences for the world. London: FT Press.

  • Berinsky, A. J., & Kinder, D. R. (2006). Making sense of issues through media frames: Understanding the Kosovo crisis. The Journal of Politics 68(3), 640–656.

  • Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10(2), 209–229.

  • Brewer, P. R. (2001). Value words and lizard brains: Do citizens deliberate about appeals to their core values? Political Psychology 22(1), 45–64.

  • Brewer, P. R., & Gross, K. (2010). Studying the effects of issue framing on public opinion about policy issues. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 159–186). New York: Routledge.

  • Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism. The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Chakravartty, P., & Downing, J. D. H. (2010). Media, technology, and the global financial crisis. International Journal of Communication, 4, 693–695.

  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication 57, 99–118.

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2004). Reasoned action in crisis communication: An attribution theory-based approach to crisis management. In D. P. Millar & R. L. Heath (Eds.), Responding to crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication (pp. 95–115). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • De Landtsheer, C. (2009). Collecting political meaning from the count of metaphor. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphors and discourses (pp. 59–78). London: Routledge.

  • de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Framing the economy. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 187–214). New York: Routledge.

  • d’Haenens, L. (2005). Euro-vision: The portrayal of Europe in the quality press. Gazette: The International Journal of Communication Studies 67(5), 419–440.

  • Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics 63, 1041–1066.

  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58.

  • Esager, M. (2011). Fire and water – A comparative analysis of conceptual metaphors in English and Danish news articles about the credit crisis 2008. Retrieved January 13, 2016 from http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/40317984/Fire_and_Water.pdf.

  • Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news. Journal of Peace Research 2(1), 64–90.

  • Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power. A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology 95(1), 1–37.

  • Hartman, T. K. (2012). Toll booths on the information superhighway? Policy metaphors in the case of net neutrality. Political Communication 29(3), 278–298.

  • Horner, J. R. (2011). Clogged systems and toxic assets. News metaphors, neoliberal ideology, and the United States ‘Wall Street Bailout’ of 2008. Journal of Language and Politics 10(1), 29–49.

  • Igartua, J., & Cheng, L. (2009). Moderating effect of group cue while processing news on immigration: Is the framing effect a heuristic process? Journal of Communication 59, 726–749.

  • Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Joris, W., d’Haenens, L., & Van Gorp, B. (2014). The Euro crisis in metaphors and frames: Focus on the press in the Low Countries. European Journal of Communication 29(5), 608–617.

  • Joris, W., Puustinen, L., Sobieraj, K., & d’Haenens, L. (2015). The battle for the Euro: Metaphors and frames in the Euro crisis news. In R. G. Picard (Ed.), The Euro crisis in the media. Journalistic coverage of economic crisis and European Institutions (pp. 127–150). London: I. B. Tauris & Co.

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

  • Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Getting real: The duration of framing effects. Journal of Communication 61, 959–983.

  • Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). News framing and public opinion: A mediation analysis of framing effects on political attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89(2), 185–204.

  • Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C. H., & Slothuus, R. (2009). Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Communication Research 36(3), 400–425.

  • Morton, T., & Duck, J. (2001). Communication and health beliefs. Mass and interpersonal influences on perceptions of risk to self and others. Communication Research 28(5), 602–626.

  • Nieminen, H., & Trappel, J. (2011). Media serving democracy. In J. Trappel, W. Meier, L. d’Haenens, J. Steemers & B. Thomass (Eds.), Media in Europe today (pp. 135–151). Bristol: Intellect.

  • Ortner, C. (2014). Wie junge Erwachsene die EU sehen und was die Medien dazu beitragen. Zur Bedeutung medienvermittelter Erfahrungen für die Entwicklung von Orientierungen gegenüber der EU [How young adults see the EU and the media’s contribution to this. About the meaning of mediated experiences for the development of orientations towards the EU]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

  • Ottati, V., Renstrom, R., & Price, E. (2014). The metaphorical framing model: Political communication and public opinion. In M. J. Landau, M. D. Robinson & B. P. Meier (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 179–202). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.

  • Picard, R. G. (2015). Understanding the crisis. In R. G. Picard (Ed.), The Euro crisis in the media: Journalistic coverage of economic crisis and European institutions (pp. 1–15). London: I. B. Tauris & Co.

  • Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J. (2015). How viruses and beasts affect our opinions (or not). The role of extendedness in metaphorical framing. Metaphor and the Social World 5(2), 245–263.

  • Robins, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). The metaphor framing effect: Metaphorical reasoning about text-based dilemmas. Discourse Processes 30(1), 57–86.

  • Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20.

  • Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLoS ONE 9(12), e113536.

  • Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE 6(2), e16782. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016782

  • Van Gorp, B. (2010). Strategies to take subjectivity out of framing analysis. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 84–109). New York: Routledge.

  • Waheed, M., Schuck, A., Neijens, P., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). The effects of news frames and political speech sources on political attitudes: The moderating role of values. Communications 40(2), 147–169.

  • Zografova, Y., Bakalova, D., & Mizova, B. (2012). Media reporting patterns in Europe: The cases of construction of the EU and Reform Treaty. Javnost 19(1), 67–84.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Price including VAT
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


Journal + Issues

The European Journal of Communication Research is an established forum for scholarship and academic debate in the field of communication science and research from a European perspective. Communications highlights the concerns of communication science through the publication of articles, research reports, review essays and book reviews on theoretical and methodological developments considered from a European perspective.

Search