The variety of devices and the socialization of consumption have decentralized access to online information which is not retrieved directly from media websites but through social networks. These same factors have driven user interest towards a wider range of both ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ topics. The aim of this article is to identify the consumption of news on these topics among digital users in Spain. The methodology used is based on an analysis of the survey conducted as part of the Digital News Report 2017. Following this analysis, a conclusion has been reached that the most popular hard news stories in Spain are those related to the local and regional community itself, and to health and education, while the most popular soft news stories relate to lifestyles and arts and culture. The analysis has revealed that increased interest in news and greater topic specialization result in more diversified use of sources, formats, and complementary routes.
Adoni, H., Peruško, Z., Nossek, H., & Schrøder, K. C. (2017). Introduction: News consumption as a democratic resource – News media repertoires across Europe. Participations, 14(2), 226–252.
Bastos, M. T. (2015). Shares, pins, and tweets. Journalism Studies, 16(3), 305–325. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2014.891857
Bjur, J., Schrøder, K. C., Hasebrink, U., Courtois, C., Adoni, H., & Nossek, H. (2013). Crossmedia use. Unfolding complexities in contemporary audiencehood. In N. Carpentier, K. C. Schrøder, & L. Hallett (Eds.), Transformations: Shifting audience positions in late modernity (pp. 15–29). New York: Routledge.
Boczkowski, P. J. (2009). Rethinking hard and soft news production: From common ground to divergent paths. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 98–116. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01406.x
Boczkowski, P. J., Mitchelstein, E., & Matassi, M. (2018). News comes across when “I’m in a moment of leisure”: Understanding the practices of incidental news consumption on social media. New Media & Society, first published online January 2, 2018, 1–7. doi:10.1177/1461444817750396
Chyi, H. I., & Lee, A. M. (2013). Online news consumption: A structural model linking preference, use, and paying intent. Digital Journalism, 1(2), 194–211. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.753299
Costera Meijer, I. (2013). Valuable journalism: A search for quality from the vantage point of the user. Journalism, 14(6), 754–770. doi:10.1177/1464884912455899
Costera Meijer, I., & Groot Kormelink, T. (2015). Checking, sharing, clicking and linking: Changing patterns of news use between 2004 and 2014. Digital Journalism, 3(5), 664–679. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.937149
Couldry, N., Livingstone, S., & Markham, T. (2007). Media consumption and public engagement: Beyond the presumption of attention. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Curran, J., Salovaara-Moring, I., Cohen, S., & Iyengar, S. (2010). Crime, foreigners and hard news: A cross-national comparison of reporting and public perception. Journalism, 11(1), 3–19. doi:10.1177/1464884909350640
European Commission (2018). A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation. Report of the independent high level group on fake news and online disinformation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Hasebrink, U., & Domeyer, H. (2012). Media repertoires as patterns of behaviour and as meaningful practices. A multimethod approach to media use in converging media environments. Participations, 9(2), 757–779.
Hasebrink, U., & Popp, J. (2006). Media repertoires as a result of selective media use. A conceptual approach to the analysis of patterns of exposure. Communications, 31(3), 369–387. doi:10.1515/COMMUN.2006.023
Hermida, A., Fletcher, F., Korell, D., & Logan, D. (2012). Share, like, recommend. Decoding the social media news consumer. Journalism Studies, 13(5–6), 815–824. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2012.664430
Jansson, A., & Lindell, J. (2015). News media consumption in the transmedia age. Journalism Studies, 16(1), 79–96. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2014.890337
Kalogeropoulos, A., Negredo, N., Picone, I., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Who shares and comments on news? A cross-national comparative analysis of online and social media participation. Social Media + Society, October-December, 1–12. doi:10.1177/2056305117735754
Kantar Media (2016). Brand and trust in a fragmented news environment. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved MONTH DAY, YEAR from http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/publication/brand-and-trust-fragmented-news-envirnment.
Kim, S. J. (2016). A repertoire approach to cross-platform media use behavior. New Media & Society, 18(3), 353–372. doi:10.1177/1461444814543162
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2012). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 1(2), 169–187. doi:10.1177/1367877912452486
McNair, B. (2017). Fake news: Falsehood, fabrication and fantasy in journalism. Oxon: Routledge.
Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., Shearer, E., & Lu, K. (2017). How Americans encounter, recall and act upon digital news. In Pew Research Center, February 2017. Retrieved MONTH DAY, YEAR from http://www.journalism.org/2017/02/09/how-americans-encounter-recall-and-act-upon-digital-news/.
Mosseri, A. (2018). News feed FYI: Bringing people close together. January 11. Retrieved MONTH DAY, YEAR from https://newsroom.fb.com/news/2018/01/news-feed-fyi-bringing-people-closer-together/.
Müller, M., Schneiders, S., & Schäfer, S. (2016). Appetizer or main dish? Explaining the use of Facebook news posts as a substitute for other news sources. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 431–441. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.003
Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Levy, D. A., & Nielsen, R. K. (2016). Digital news report. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Nielsen, R. K., & Schrøder, K. C. (2014). The relative importance of social media for accessing, finding, and engaging with news. Digital Journalism, 2(4), 472–489. doi:10.1080/21670811.2013.872420
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. New York: The Penguin Press.
Patterson, T. E. (2000). Doing well and doing good: How soft news are shrinking the news audience and weakening democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pew Research Center (2015). The evolving role of news on Twitter and Facebook. July 14. Retrieved MONTH DAY, YEAR from http://www.journalism.org/files/2015/07/Twitter-and-News-Survey-Report-FINAL2.pdf.
Pew Research Center (2017). State of news media. Retrieved January 15, YEAR from http://www.pewresearch.org/topics/state-of-the-news-media/.
Reinemann, C., Stanyer, J., Scherr, S., & Legnante, G. (2011). Hard and soft news: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 221–239. doi:10.1177/1464884911427803
Rosendale, J. A., & Longcore, A. (2015). On hard versus soft news: A content analysis of reporting by three nationally-televised evening news programs. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 57–61. doi:10.4236/jss.2015.311008
Serrano-Puche, J. (2017). Meta-analysis of digital consumption in the contemporary media ecosystem: Key factors and emotional implications. Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 8(1), 75–85. doi:10.14198/MEDCOM2017.8.1.6
Shoemaker, P. J., & Cohen, A. A. (2006). News around the world. Content, practitioners and the public. New York: Routledge.
Schrøder, K. C. (2015). News media old and new. Fluctuating audiences, news repertoires and locations of consumption. Journalism Studies, 16(1), 60–79. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2014.890332
Schrøder, K. C., & Kobbernagel, C. (2010). Towards a typology of cross-media news consumption: A qualitative–quantitative synthesis. Northern Lights, 8, 115–138.
Swart, J., Peters, C., & Broersma, M. (2017). Navigating cross-media news use. Media repertoires and the value of news in everyday life. Journalism Studies, 18(11), 1343–1362. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2015.1129285
Tandoc, E. C., Wei Lim, Z., & Ling, L. (2018). Defining “fake news”. A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143
Taneja, H., Webster, J. G., Malthouse, E. C., & Ksiazek, T. B. (2012). Media consumption across platforms: Identifying user-defined repertoires. New Media & Society, 14(6), 951–968. doi:10.1177/1461444811436146
Tewksbury, D., Weaver, A. J., & Maddex, B. (2001). Accidentally informed: Incidental news exposure on the world wide web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 533–554.
Tuchman, G. (1973). Making news by doing work: Routinizing the unexpected. American Journal of Sociology, 79(1), 109–131.
Van Rees, C.J., & Van Eijck, K (2003). Media repertoires of selective audiences. Poetics: Journal of Empirical Research on Literature, the Media and the Arts, 31(5–6), 465–490.
Yuan, E. (2011). News consumption across multiple media platforms. Information, Communication & Society, 14(7), 998–1016. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2010.549235
rmational leadership, procedural justice, and family-supportive workplace initiatives. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 231–245.
Jo, S., Hon, L. C., & Brunner, B. R. (2004). Organisation-public relationships: Measurement validation in a university setting. Journal of Communication Management, 9(1), 14–27.
Keller, K. L. (1998). Strategic brand management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kent, M. L., Taylor, M., & Turcilo, L. (2006). Public relations by newly privatized businesses in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Public Relations Review, 32(1), 10–17.
Kiambi, D. M., & Nadler, M. K. (2012). Public relations in Kenya: An exploration of models and cultural influences. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 505–507.
Kiousis, S., Popescu, C., & Mitrook, M. (2007). Understanding influence on corporate reputation: An examination of public relations efforts, media coverage, public opinion, and financial performance from an agenda-building and agenda-setting perspective. Journal of Public Relations Research, 19(2), 147–165.
Koch, T. (2016). Journalism or public relations? A quantitative survey of custom publishing editors in Germany. Public Relations Review, 42(2), 345–352.
Kovačič, M. P., & Erjavec, K. (2010). Production process of unlabeled advertorials in the Slovenian press. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 35(4), 375–395.
Lafferty, B. A., Goldsmith, R. E., & Newell, S. J. (2002). The dual credibility model: The influence of corporate and endorser credibility on attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1–12.
Lee, S., & Yoon, Y. (2010). Return on investment (ROI) of international public relations: A country-level analysis. Public Relations Review, 36(1), 15–20.
Marney, J. (1998). The compelling corporate image: How and why good corporate advertising does more than just build goodwill. Marketing, 103, 29.
Newell, S. J., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2001). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 25(3), 235–247.
Nikolić, M., Đorđević, D., & Ćoćkalo, D. (2007). Research on certain aspects of PR function in Serbian companies. Journal for East European Management Studies, 12(2), 152–173.
Nikolić, M., Savić, M., Ćoćkalo, D., Spasojević-Brkić, V., & Ivin, D. (2011). The impact of Serbian public relations on economic indices, Public Relations Review, 37(3), 332–335.
Nikolić, M., Terek, E., Vukonjanski, J., & Đurin, S. (2012). The state of the PR profession in Serbian companies: A comparative study in 2006 and 2012. 19th international public relations symposium BledCom, Lake Bled, Slovenia. July 6–7, 92–96.
Nikolić, M., Terek, E., Vukonjanski, J., & Ivin, D. (2012). The impact of internal communication on strategic and economic effects in Serbian companies. Public Relations Review, 38(2), 288–293.
Nikolić, M., Vukonjanski, J., Nedeljković, M., Hadžić, O., & Terek, E. (2013). The impact of internal communication on job satisfaction dimensions and the moderating role of LMX. Public Relations Review, 39(5), 563–565.
Pierach, J. (2002). PR must evolve to gain a seat at the table. Brandweek, 43, 41–42.
Plowman, K. D. (2005). Conflict, strategic management, and public relations. Public Relations Review, 31(1), 131–138.
Plowman, K. D. (2013). Creating a model to measure relationships: U.S. Army strategic communication. Public Relations Review, 39(5), 549–557.
Podnar, K., Lah, M., & Golob, U. (2009). Economic perspectives on public relations. Public Relations Review, 35(4), 340–345.
Sriramesh, K. (1992). Societal culture and public relations: Ethnographic evidence from India. Public Relations Review, 18(2), 201–211.
Swart, C. (2012). Building organisation–public relationships: Towards an understanding of the challenges facing public relations. Communicatio – South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 38(3), 329–348.
Taylor, M. (2004). Exploring public relations in Croatia through relational communication and media richness theories. Public Relations Review, 30(2), 145–160.
Tkalac Verčič, A., Lalić, D., & Vujičić, D. (2017). Journalists and public relations practitioners: Comparing two countries. Public Relations Review, 43(3), 527–536.
Triantafillidou, A., & Yannas, P. (2014). How public relations agencies in Greece respond to digital trends. Public Relations Review, 40(5), 815–817.
Vasquez, G. M., & Taylor, M. (2000). What cultural values influence American public relations practitioners? Public Relations Review, 25(4), 433–449.
Verčič, D., & Tkalac Verčič, A. (2012). Public relations and lobbying: New legislation in Slovenia. Public Relations Review, 38(1), 14–21.
Verčič, D., Tkalac Verčič, A., & Laco, K. (2006). Coorientation theory in international relations: The case of Slovenia and Croatia. Public Relations Review, 32(1), 1–9.
Wells, B., & Spinks, N. (1999). Media relations: Powerful tools for achieving service quality. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 9(4), 246–256.
Wilcox, D. L., & Cameron, G. T. (2010). Public relations (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Wu, M.-Y., & Baah-Boakye, K. (2009). Public relations in Ghana: Work-related cultural values and public relations models. Public Relations Review, 35(1), 83–85.
The European Journal of Communication Research is an established forum for scholarship and academic debate in the field of communication science and research from a European perspective. Communications highlights the concerns of communication science through the publication of articles, research reports, review essays and book reviews on theoretical and methodological developments considered from a European perspective.