Exploring film genre preferences through taste cultures: A survey on contemporary film consumption amongst youth in Flanders (Belgium)

  • 1 Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, The Netherlands
  • 2 Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, The Netherlands
  • 3 Department of Communication Studies, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Aleit Veenstra
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Communication Studies, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, The Netherlands
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
, Philippe Meers and Daniël Biltereyst

Abstract

This article explores contemporary film genre preferences through an in-depth sociological analysis of taste cultures in film preferences amongst youth aged 16–18 in Flanders (the northern Dutch-speaking part of Belgium). Building on a representative sample of 1015 respondents we statistically analyze the assumption that contemporary media audiences demonstrate mobility and that they are eager to shape their media consumption in accordance with their personal preferences. This article examines whether societal structures that have been found to reflect media preferences remain in place, or whether these structures have eroded with the (supposed) increase in individual choice – an argument often voiced in the context of convergence culture. An analysis of the variables gender, educational level and ethnicity illustrates that societal structures are still reflected through film genre preferences amongst Flemish youth.

  • Altman, R. (1984). A semantic/syntactic approach to film genre. Cinema Journal, 23(3), 6–18.

  • Bennett, A., & Robards, B. (2014). Introduction: Youth, cultural practice and media technologies. In A. Bennett & B. Robards (Eds.), Mediated youth cultures: The internet, belonging and new cultural configurations (pp. 1–7). Hampshire, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Biltereyst, D., & Meers, P. (2011). The political economy of audiences. In J. Wasko, G. Murdock & H. Sousa (Eds.), The handbook of political economy of communications (pp. 415–435).

  • Bird, S. E. (2011). Are we all produsers now? Convergence and media audience practices. Cultural Studies, 25(4–5), 502–516. doi:10.1080/09502386.2011.600532

  • Bourdieu, P. (2009 [1979]). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge.

  • Bryson, B. (1996). ʻAnything but heavy metalʼ: Symbolic exclusion and musical dislikes. American Sociological Review, 884–899.

  • Butsch, R. (2001). Class and audience effects: A history of research on movies, radio, and television. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 29(3), 112–120.

  • Chan, T. W., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2005). The social stratification of theatre, dance and cinema attendance. Cultural Trends, 14(3), 193–212.

  • Couldry, N. (2011). More sociology, more culture, more politics. Or, a modest proposal for ʻconvergenceʼ studies. Cultural Studies, 25(4–5), 487–501. doi:10.1080/09502386.2011.600528

  • Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge, Malden: Polity.

  • Cui, D. (2015). Capital, distinction, and racialized habitus: Immigrant youth in the educational field. Journal of Youth Studies, ahead-of-print, 1–16.

  • Daenekindt, S., & Roose, H. (2013). A mise-en-scène of the shattered habitus: The effect of social mobility on aesthetic dispositions towards films. European Sociological Review, 29(1), 48–59.

  • Dhoest, A. (2012). Imagined communities of television viewers: Reception research on national and ethnic miority audiences. In H. Bilandzic, G. Patriarche & P. J. Traudt (Eds.), The social use of media: Cultural and social scientific perspectives on audience research (pp. 87–104). Bristol, Chicago: Intellect.

  • Dhoest, A. (2015). Connections that matter: The relative importance of ethnic-cultural origin, age and generation in media uses among diasporic youth in Belgium. Journal of Children and Media, 9(3), 277–293.

  • Fischoff, S., Antonio, J., & Lewis, D. (1998). Favorite films and film genres as a function of race, age, and gender. Journal of Media Psychology, 3(1), 1–9.

  • Gripsrud, J. (2002). Distinctions: Social difference, lifestyle and taste. In J. Gripsrud (Ed.), Understanding media culture (pp. 60–98). London: Hodder Education.

  • Hall, S. (2002). Tall revenue features: The Genealogy of the Modern Blockbuster. In S. Neale (Ed.), Genre and contemporary Hollywood (pp. 11–26). London: British Film Institute.

  • Jancovich, M. (2000). ʻA real shockerʼ: Authenticity, genre and the struggle for distinction. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 14(1), 23–35.

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

  • Krijnen, T., & Van Bauwel, S. (2015). Gender and Media: Representing, Producing, Consuming. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Kuipers, G. (2006). Television and taste hierarchy: The case of Dutch television comedy. Media, Culture & Society, 28(3), 359–378. doi:10.1177/0163443706062884

  • Lassner, R. (1944). Sex and age determinants of theatre and movie interests. The Journal of General Psychology, 31(2), 241–271.

  • Maltby, R. (1999). Sticks, hicks and flaps: Classical Hollywoodʼs generic conception of its audiences. In R. Maltby & M. Stokes (Eds.), Identifying Hollywoodʼs audiences: Cultural identity and the movies (pp. 23–41). London: British Film Institute Publishing.

  • McRobbie, A. (2008). Young women and consumer culture. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 531–550. doi:10.1080/09502380802245803

  • Meers, P. (2004). ʻItʼs the language of film!ʼ: Young film audiences on Hollywood and Europe. In R. Maltby & M. Stokes (Eds.), Hollywood abroad: Audiences and cultural exchange (pp. 158–175). London British Film Institute Publishing.

  • Peterson, R. A. (1992). Understanding audience segmentation: From elite and mass to omnivore and univore. Poetics, 21(4), 243–258.

  • Peterson, R. A. (2005). Problems in comparative research: The example of omnivorousness. Poetics, 33(5), 257–282.

  • Staiger, J. (2005). Media reception studies. New York, London: NYU Press.

  • Van Eijck, K. (2000). Richard A. Peterson and the culture of consumption. Poetics, 28(2), 207–224.

  • Vandevelde, I., Smets, K., Meers, P., Vande Winkel, R., & Van Bauwel, S. (2011). Bollywood and Turkish films in Antwerp (Belgium): Two case studies on diasporic distribution and exhibition. Javnost – the Public, 18(3), 55–70.

  • Warde, A., Wright, D., & Gayo-Cal, M. (2007). Understanding cultural omnivorousness: Or, the myth of the cultural omnivore. Cultural Sociology, 1(2), 143–164.

  • Willekens, M., Daenekindt, S., & Lievens, J. (2014). Whose education matters more? Mothers’ and fathers’ education and the cultural participation of adolescents. Cultural Sociology, 291–309. doi:10.1177/1749975514533686

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

The European Journal of Communication Research is an established forum for scholarship and academic debate in the field of communication science and research from a European perspective. Communications highlights the concerns of communication science through the publication of articles, research reports, review essays and book reviews on theoretical and methodological developments considered from a European perspective.

Search