Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 3, 2013

PSS with SVC Damping Controllers Coordinated Design and Real-Time Implementation in Multi-Machine Power System Using Advanced Adaptive PSO

  • Rajendraprasad Narne EMAIL logo and P.C. Panda

Abstract

This article proposed coordinated tuning and real-time implementation of power system stabilizer (PSS) with static var compensator (SVC) in multi-machine power system. The design of proposed coordinated damping controller is formulated as an optimization problem, and the controller gains are optimized instantaneously using advanced adaptive particle swarm optimization. Here, PSS with SVC installed in multi-machine system is examined. The coordinated tuning among the damping controllers is performed on the non-linear power system dynamic model. Finally, the proposed coordinated controller performance is discussed with time-domain simulations. Different loading conditions are employed on the test system to test the robustness of proposed coordinate controller, and the simulation results are compared with four different control schemes. To validate the proposed controller, the test power system is also implemented on real-time (OPAL-RT) simulator, and acceptable results are reported for its verifications.

Appendix

System data for three-machine nine-bus power system [2]: all data in p.u. on a 100-MVA base

References

1. KundurP.Power system stability and control. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.Search in Google Scholar

2. AndersonPM, FouadAA.Power system control and stability. Piscataway, NJ: Wiley-Interscience, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

3. HingoraniG, GyugyiL.Understanding FACTS-concepts and technology of flexible AC transmission systems. New York: IEEE Press, 2000.Search in Google Scholar

4. KennedyJ, EberhartR.Particle swarm optimization. IEEE Int Conf Neural Netw1995;4:19428.Search in Google Scholar

5. AbidoMA.Optimal design of power–system stabilizers using particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Energy Conversion2002;17:40613.10.1109/TEC.2002.801992Search in Google Scholar

6. ShayeghiH, ShayanfarHA, SafariA, AghmashehR.A robust PSSs design using PSO in a multi-machine environment. Energy Conversion Manage2010;51:696702.10.1016/j.enconman.2009.10.025Search in Google Scholar

7. AbidoMA.Analysis of power system stability enhancement via excitation and FACTS-based stabilizers. Electric Power Components Syst2004;32:7591.10.1080/15325000490196915Search in Google Scholar

8. PandaS, Narayana PrasadP.Comparison of particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm for FACTS-based controller design. Appl Soft Comput2008;8:141827.10.1016/j.asoc.2007.10.009Search in Google Scholar

9. LeiX, LerchEN, PovhD.Optimization and coordination of damping controls for improving system dynamic performance. IEEE Trans Power Syst2001;16:47380.10.1109/59.932284Search in Google Scholar

10. ShayeghiH, ShayanfarHA, SafariA.PSS and TCSC damping controller coordinated design using PSO in multi-machine power system. Energy Conversion Manage2010;51:29307.10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.034Search in Google Scholar

11. BianXY, TseCT, ZhangJF, WangKW.Coordinated design of probabilistic PSS and SVC damping controllers. Int J Electric Power Energy Syst2011;33:44552.10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.10.006Search in Google Scholar

12. Abd-ElazimSM, AliES.Coordinated design of PSSs and SVC via bacteria foraging optimization algorithm in a multimachine power system. Int J Electric Power Energy Syst2012;41:4452.10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.02.016Search in Google Scholar

13. ChaturvediKT, PanditM, SrivastavaL.Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimization for non-convex economic dispatch. IEEE Trans Power Syst2008;23:107987.10.1109/TPWRS.2008.926455Search in Google Scholar

14. ShiYu-hui, EberhartRC. Empirical study of particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Congress Evolutionary Computation, 1999;3:10106.Search in Google Scholar

15. ClercM, KennedyJ.The particle swarm – explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput2002;6:5873.10.1109/4235.985692Search in Google Scholar

16. RatnaweeraA, HalgamugeSK, WatsonHC.Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients. IEEE Trans Evol Comput2004;8:24055.10.1109/TEVC.2004.826071Search in Google Scholar

17. PandaS.Differential evolutionary algorithm for TCSC-based controller design. Simulation Model Pract Theory2009;17:161834.10.1016/j.simpat.2009.07.002Search in Google Scholar

18. BélangerJ, LapointeV, DufourC, SchoenL.eMEGAsim: An open high-performance distributed real-time power grid simulator. Architecture and specification. Presented at the International Conference on Power Systems (ICPS’07), Bangalore, India, 12–14 December 2007.Search in Google Scholar

19. RT-LAB Professional. Available at: http://www.opal-rt.com/product/rt-lab-professionalSearch in Google Scholar

20. MikkiliS, PandaAK.RTDS hardware implementation and simulation of 3-ph 4-wire SHAF for mitigation of current harmonics with p-q and I d-I q control strategies using fuzzy logic controller. Int J Emerg Electric Power Syst2011;12:1–24.10.2202/1553-779X.2758Search in Google Scholar

21. PaiMA.Energy function analysis for power system stability. Norwell, MA: Kluwer, 1989.10.1007/978-1-4613-1635-0Search in Google Scholar

22. HaqueMH.Best location of SVC to improve first swing stability limit of a power system. Electric Power Syst Res2007;77:140209.10.1016/j.epsr.2006.10.010Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-09-03

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 28.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijeeps-2013-0049/html
Scroll to top button