Abstract
Background
Tears are common after vaginal birth, and different impact factors are known. However, the impact of tears from a previous birth to the tears of a subsequent birth is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the distribution of birth tear patterns according to the sustained tears in a previous birth, in addition to other impact factors.
Methods
In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated all women up to parity 4 with subsequent vaginal, singleton births of vertex presentation at ≥37 + 0 gestational weeks between 1/2005 and 12/2016. Their tears were grouped into tear patterns and were analyzed by parity. Tear patterns in the subsequent births were analyzed in association to the patterns of the previous births and impact factors were evaluated.
Results
We counted 4017 births in 1855 women [P1: 1368 (34.1%), P2: 1730 (43.1%), P3: 741 (18.4%), P4: 178 (4.4%)]. The frequency of tears and episiotomies decreased with higher parity, whereas the frequency of intact perineum increased. Twenty-eight different unique tear patterns were found. We could show that birth tear patterns changed with increasing parity and were associated with sustained tears in a previous birth. In addition, some impact factors on tear patterns could be identified.
Conclusion
The distribution of the single tear types is in accordance with the current literature. However, it is new that distinct tear patterns are associated to sustained tear patterns of previous births. Furthermore, we demonstrated some weak associations of tear patterns to certain impact factors, such as more episiotomies, low-grade perineal or vaginal tears isolated or in combination with other tears with increasing fetal weight and head circumference in the higher parities, and with a longer duration of the second stage and the pushing phase in lower parities.
Author contributions: NK: project development, data collection and management, manuscript writing; AY: data management, statistical analysis, manuscript editing; RZ: project development, manuscript editing; EF: data management, statistical analysis, manuscript editing. All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
Ethical approval: The study was approved by the ethical board of the district (KEK-ZH-No. 2016-02079).
References
1. Wang H, Jayasekara R, Warland J. The effect of “hands on” techniques on obstetric perineal laceration: a structured review of the literature. Women Birth 2015;28:194–8.10.1016/j.wombi.2015.02.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. de Souza Caroci da Costa A, Gonzalez Riesco ML. A comparison of “hands off” versus “hands on” techniques for decreasing perineal lacerations during birth. J Midwifery Womens Health 2006;51:106–11.10.1016/j.jmwh.2005.10.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Aabakke AJ, Willer H, Krebs L. The effect of maneuvers for shoulder delivery on perineal trauma: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2016;95:1070–7.10.1111/aogs.12914Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Albers L, Garcia J, Renfrew M, McCandlish R, Elbourne D. Distribution of genital tract trauma in childbirth and related postnatal pain. Birth 1999;26:11–7.10.1046/j.1523-536x.1999.00011.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Ventolini G, Yaklic JL, Galloway ML, Hampton M, Maher JE. Obstetric vulvar lacerations and postpartum dyspareunia. J Reprod Med 2014;59:560–5.Search in Google Scholar
6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 165: prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:e1–15.10.1097/AOG.0000000000001523Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Vale de Castro Monteiro M, Pereira GM, Aguiar RA, Azevedo RL, Correia-Junior MD, Reis ZS, et al. Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:61–7.10.1007/s00192-015-2795-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. Rogers RG, Leeman LM, Borders N, Qualls C, Fullilove AM, Teaf D, et al. Contribution of the second stage of labour to pelvic floor dysfunction: a prospective cohort comparison of nulliparous women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;121:1145–53; discussion 54.10.1111/1471-0528.12571Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
9. Smith LA, Price N, Simonite V, Burns EE. Incidence of and risk factors for perineal trauma: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2013;13:59.10.1186/1471-2393-13-59Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
10. Kimmich N, Grauwiler V, Richter A, Zimmermann R, Kreft M. Birth lacerations in different genital compartments and their effect on maternal subjective outcome: a prospective observational study. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2019;223:359–68.10.1055/a-0858-0138Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Birri J, Kreft M, Zimmermann R, Kimmich N. [Association of birth trauma with the implementation of obstetrical monitoring tools: a retrospective cohort study]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2019;223:157–68.Search in Google Scholar
12. Thom DH, Rortveit G. Prevalence of postpartum urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:1511–22.10.3109/00016349.2010.526188Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Yang X, Zhang HX, Yu HY, Gao XL, Yang HX, Dong Y, et al. The prevalence of fecal incontinence and urinary incontinence in primiparous postpartum Chinese women. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;1522147.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.05.031Search in Google Scholar
14. Radestad I, Olsson A, Nissen E, Rubertsson C. Tears in the vagina, perineum, sphincter ani, and rectum and first sexual intercourse after childbirth: a nationwide follow-up. Birth 2008;35:98–106.10.1111/j.1523-536X.2008.00222.xSearch in Google Scholar
15. Albers LL, Anderson D, Cragin L, Daniels SM, Hunter C, Sedler KD, et al. Factors related to perineal trauma in childbirth. J Nurse Midwifery 1996;41:269–76.10.1016/0091-2182(96)00042-0Search in Google Scholar
16. Aasheim V, Nilsen ABV, Reinar LM, Lukasse M. Perineal techniques during the second stage of labour for reducing perineal trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;6:CD006672.10.1002/14651858.CD006672.pub3Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
17. Bourgon N, Mottet N, Bourtembourg A, Pugin A, Ramanah R, Riethmuller D. [Obstetrical anal sphincter injuries and vacuum-assisted delivery at term in primiparas]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol 2018;46:686–91.Search in Google Scholar
18. Rockner G, Wahlberg V, Olund A. Episiotomy and perineal trauma during childbirth. J Adv Nurs 1989;14:264–8.10.1111/j.1365-2648.1989.tb03412.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
19. Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009:CD000081.10.1002/14651858.CD000081.pub2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
20. Rostaminia G, Peck JD, Van Delft K, Thakar R, Sultan A, Shobeiri SA. New measures for predicting birth-related pelvic floor trauma. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2016;22:292–6.10.1097/SPV.0000000000000282Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
21. Hals E, Oian P, Pirhonen T, Gissler M, Hjelle S, Nilsen EB, et al. A multicenter interventional program to reduce the incidence of anal sphincter tears. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:901–8.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eda77aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Jansova M, Kalis V, Lobovsky L, Hyncik L, Karbanova J, Rusavy Z. The role of thumb and index finger placement in manual perineal protection. Int Urogynecol J 2014;25:1533–40.10.1007/s00192-014-2425-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. Pirhonen J, Samuelsson E, Pirhonen T, Odeback A, Gissler M. Interventional program to reduce both the incidence of anal sphincter tears and rate of Caesarean sections. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018;223:56–9.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.02.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed
24. Stedenfeldt M, Oian P, Gissler M, Blix E, Pirhonen J. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury after a successful multicentre interventional programme. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2014;121: 83–91.10.1111/1471-0528.12274Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Laine K, Skjeldestad FE, Sandvik L, Staff AC. Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study. BMJ Open 2012;2.10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001649Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston