„Womit aber hatten es dieKinder des Hauses verschuldet, daß er nur für dieKnechte sorgte?“

Schillers Auseinandersetzung mit Kants ‚Rigorismus‘

  • 1 Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department I – Deutsche Philologie, Schellingstraße 3 RG, D-80799, München, Deutschland
PD Dr. Gideon Stiening
  • Corresponding author
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department I – Deutsche Philologie, Schellingstraße 3 RG, D-80799, München, Deutschland
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar

Abstract

In Schillerʼs On Grace and Dignity of 1794, his critique of the alleged ‘rigorism’ of Kantian ethics is particularly harsh: Kant has developed an ethic for “servants” that suppresses human nature for fear of it and does not reconcile it. The essay attempts to show that this critique is based on Schillerʼs double misunderstanding: a misunderstanding of the Kantian conception and a misunderstanding of its own alternative model. This analysis and interpretation of Schillerʼs critique of Kant’s ethics also leads to the realization that Schillerʼs idea of morality is ultimately more rigid than Kantʼs theory, which was so harshly criticized.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Kant-Studien is devoted to philosophical and historical studies on Kant and Kantian topics. The journal publishes a comprehensive bibliography of new works on Kant, and provides reviews of the most important books. It is thus the leading German and English language resource on the current state of Kant research.

Search