Sampling for variety

  • 1 Yleinen kielitiede, PL 24, 00014 Helsingin yliopisto, Finland
  • 2 Capaciteitsgroep Taalwetenschap, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Spuistraat 134, 1012 VB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • 3 Department of Linguistics, 2-40 Assiniboia Hall, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E7
Matti Miestamo, Dik Bakker and Antti Arppe

Abstract

Variety sampling aims at capturing as much of the world’s linguistic variety as possible. The article discusses and compares two sampling methods designed for variety sampling: the Diversity Value method, in which sample languages are picked according to the diversity found in family trees, and the Genus-Macroarea method, in which genealogical stratification is primarily based on genera and areal stratification pays attention to the proportional representation of the genealogical diversity of macroareas. The pros and cons of the methods are discussed, some additional features are introduced to the Genus-Macroarea method, and the ability of both methods to capture crosslinguistic variety is tested with computerized simulations drawing on data in The world atlas of language structures database.

  • Bakker, Dik. 2011. Language sampling. In Jae Jung Song (ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic typology, 100–127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Bell, Alan. 1978. Language samples. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language, Vol. 1: Method & theory, 123–156. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

  • Bickel, Balthasar. 2007. Typology in the 21st century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11. 239–251

  • Bickel, Balthasar. 2008. A refined sampling procedure for genealogical control. Language Typology and Universals 61. 221–233.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols. 2013. The Autotyp genealogy and geography database 2013 release. http://www.autotyp.uzh.ch/available.html

  • Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Campbell, Lyle. 1997. American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of Native America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Croft, William. 2003. Typology and universals. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Cysouw, Michael. 2011. Understanding transition probabilities. Linguistic Typology 15. 415–431.

  • Dahl, Östen. 2008. An exercise in a posteriori language sampling. Language Typology and Universals 61. 208–220.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Dryer, Matthew S. 1989. Large linguistic areas and language sampling. Studies in Language 13. 257–292.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68. 81–138.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Dryer, Matthew S. 2000. Counting genera vs. counting languages. Linguistic Typology 4. 334–350.

  • Dryer, Matthew S. 2005a. Genealogical language list. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2005, 584–644. Updates to the classification available in the online version of 2008 at http://blog.wals.info/errata-in-the-printed-edition-of-2005/

  • Dryer, Matthew S. 2005b. Order of subject, object and verb. In Haspelmath et al. (eds.) 2005, 330–333.

  • Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Genealogical language list. In Dryer & Haspelmath (eds.) 2013. http://wals.info/languoid/genealogy

  • Dryer, Matthew S. & Martin Haspelmath (eds.). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max-Planck-Institut für evolutionäre Anthropologie. http://wals.info/

  • Gordon, Raymond G., Jr. (ed.). 2005. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 15th edn. Dallas: SIL International. http://archive.ethnologue.com/15/web.asp

  • Grimes, Barbara F. (ed.). 1996. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 13th edn. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.

  • Grimes, Joseph E. & Barbara F. Grimes. 1996. Ethnologue: Language family index to the thirteenth edition of the Ethnologue. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.

  • Hammarström, Harald. 2009. Sampling and genealogical coverage in WALS. Linguistic Typology 13. 105–119.

  • Hammarström, Harald & Mark Donohue. 2014. Some principles on the use of macro-areas in typological comparison. Language Dynamics and Change 4. 167–187.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Hammarström, Harald, Robert Forkel, Martin Haspelmath & Sebastian Bank. 2015. Glottolog 2.4. Leipzig: Max-Planck Institut für evolutionäre Anthropologie. http://glottolog.org

  • Haspelmath, Martin, Matthew Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds.) 2005. The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Henriksen, Carol & Johan van der Auwera. 1994. The Germanic languages. In Ekkehard König & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Germanic languages, 1–18. London: Routledge.

  • Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2000. Towards a typology of typologies. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 53. 5–12.

  • Janhunen, Juha. 2009. Proto-Uralic – what, where, and when? In Jussi Ylikoski (ed.), The quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugrian Society (Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 258), 57–78. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.

  • Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria & Bernhard Wälchli. 2001. The Circum-Baltic languages: An areal-typological approach. In Östen Dahl & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (eds.), Circum-Baltic languages, Vol. 2: Grammar and typology, 615–750. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Levinson, Stephen C., Simon J. Greenhill, Russell D. Gray & Michael Dunn. 2011. Universal typological dependencies should be detectable in the history of language families. Linguistic Typology 15. 509–534.

  • Lewis, M. Paul, Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig (eds.). 2015. Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 18th edn. Dallas: SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com/

  • Maslova, Elena. 2000. A dynamic approach to the verification of distributional universals. Linguistic Typology 4. 307–333.

  • Miestamo, Matti. 2003. Clausal negation: A typological study. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto doctoral dissertation.

  • Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard negation: The negation of declarative verbal main clauses in a typological perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

  • Miestamo, Matti. 2009. Implicational hierarchies and grammatical complexity. In Geoffrey Sampson, David Gil & Peter Trudgill (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable, 80–97.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Murdock, George Peter. 1968. World sampling provinces. Ethnology 7. 305–326.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Perkins, Revere D. 1989. Statistical techniques for determining language sample size. Studies in Language 13. 293–315.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Perkins, Revere D. 1992. Deixis, grammar, and culture. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

  • Perkins, Revere D. 2000. The view from hologeistic linguistics (Commentary on Maslova 2000). Linguistic Typology 4. 350–353.

  • Rankin, Robert L. 1993. On Siouan chronology. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC.

  • Rijkhoff, Jan. 2009. On the (un)suitability of semantic categories. Linguistic Typology 13. 95–104.

  • Rijkhoff, Jan & Dik Bakker. 1998. Language sampling. Linguistic Typology 2. 263–314.

  • Rijkhoff, Jan, Dik Bakker, Kees Hengeveld & Peter Kahrel. 1993. A method of language sampling. Studies in Language 17. 169–203.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Ruhlen, Merritt. 1991. A guide to the world’s languages, Vol. 1: Classification, with a postscript on recent developments. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Originally published in 1987 without postscript.

  • Stassen, Leon. 1997. Intransitive predication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Stolz, Thomas & Traude Gugeler. 2000. Comitative typology. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 53. 53–61.

  • Tomlin, Russell S. 1986. Basic word order: Functional principles. London: Croom Helm.

  • Voegelin, Charles F. & Florence M. Voegelin. 1977. Classification and index of the world’s languages. New York: Elsevier.

  • Wichman, Søren & David Kamholz. 2008. A stability metric for typological features. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61. 251–262.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

Linguistic Typology publishes research on linguistic diversity and unity. It welcomes articles that report empirical findings about crosslinguistic variation, advance our understanding of the patterns of diversity, or refine typological methodology.

Search