Corrigendum to: Topicality and the typology of predicative possession

Hilary Chappell 1  and Denis Creissels 2
  • 1 Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale, CRLAO, INaLCO, 2 rue de Lille, 75007, Paris, France
  • 2 Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage (UMR 5596 du CNRS), Université Lyon 2, DDL-ISH, 14 avenue Berthelot, 69007, Lyon, France
Hilary Chappell
  • Corresponding author
  • Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale, CRLAO, INaLCO, 2 rue de Lille, 75007, Paris, France
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
and Denis Creissels
  • Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage (UMR 5596 du CNRS), Université Lyon 2, DDL-ISH, 14 avenue Berthelot, 69007, Lyon, France
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
This erratum corrects the original online version which can be found here: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2019-0016

Corrigendum to: Chappell, Hilary and Denis Creissels. November 2019. Topicality and the typology of predicative possession. Linguistic Typology. Volume 23, Issue 3, pages 467–532. (DOI:10.1515/lingty-2019-0016):

The authors would like to make the following corrections to their article:

In Example (36b) on page 497, a character is incorrect. The sentence should be 王有梦,不隹害 instead of 王有梦,不

Example (70) on page 513 contains an incorrect symbol and an omission. The correct version is this:

Cái-gìcánhđềubayđược.
CL-whatEPPwingallflybe.possible

‘Whatever has wings can fly.’

On page 514, line 8, it should be “Shuhi” instead of “Shihu”.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

FREE ACCESS

Journal + Issues

Linguistic Typology publishes research on linguistic diversity and unity. It welcomes articles that report empirical findings about crosslinguistic variation, advance our understanding of the patterns of diversity, or refine typological methodology.

Search