The Impact of Quantitative Easing on Bank Loan Supply and Monetary Policy Implementation in the Euro Area

Maximilian Horst
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Economics, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, Dusseldorf, 40225, Germany
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
and Ulrike Neyer
  • Department of Economics, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar


In March 2015, the Eurosystem launched its QE programme. The asset purchases induced a rapid and strong increase in excess reserves, implying a structural liquidity surplus in the euro area banking sector. Against this background, the first part of this paper analyses the Eurosystem’s liquidity management during normal times, crisis times and times of too low inflation. With a focus on the latter, the second part of this paper develops a relatively simple theoretical model in which banks operate under a structural liquidity surplus. The model shows that increasing excess reserves have no or even a contractionary impact on bank loan supply. As the newly created excess reserves are heterogeneously distributed across euro area countries, the impact of QE on bank loan supply may differ across countries. Moreover, we derive implications for monetary policy implementation. Increases in the central bank’s main refinancing rate as well as in the minimum reserve ratio and decreases in the central bank’s deposit rate develop expansionary effects on loan supply – contrary to the case in which banks face a structural liquidity deficit.

  • Alvarez, I., F. Casavecchia, M. De Luca, A. Duering, F. Eser, C. Helmus, C. Hemous, N. Herrala, J. Jakovicka, M. Lo Russo, F. Pasqualone, M. Rubens, R. Soares and F. Zennaro (2017): The Use of the Eurosystem’s Monetary Policy Instruments and Operational Framework Since 2012. ECB Occasional Paper Series 188, May 2017.

  • Avdjiev, S., M. Everett and H. S. Shin (2019): Following the Imprint of the ECB’s Asset Purchase Programme on Global Bond and Deposit Flows, BIS Quaterly Review, March 2019, 69–81.

  • Baldo, L., B. Hallinger, C. Helmus, N. Herrala, D. Martins, F. Mohing, F. Petroulakis, M. Resinek, O. Vergote, B. Usciati and Y. Wang (2017): The Distribution of Excess Liquidity in the Euro Area, ECB Occasional Paper Series 200, November 2017.

  • Bech, M. and C. Monnet (2016): A Search-Based Model of the Interbank Money Market and Monetary Policy Implementation, Journal of Economic Theory 164, 32–67.

  • Bernanke, B. S. and A. S. Blinder (1988): Credit, Money, and Aggregate Demand, American Economic Review 78, 435–439.

  • Bernanke, B. S. and M. Gertler (1995): Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4),27–48.

  • Bindseil, U. (2014): Monetary Policy Operations and the Financial System, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  • Bindseil, U., G. Camba-Mendez, A. Hirsch and B. Weller (2006): Excess Reserves and the Implementation of Monetary Policy of the ECB, Journal of Policy Modeling 28(5),491–510.

  • Bowman, D., F. Cai, S. Davies and S. Kamin (2015): Quantitative Easing and Bank Lending: Evidence from Japan, Journal of International Money and Finance 57, 15–30.

  • Bucher, M., A. Hauck and U. Neyer (2019): Interbank Market Friction-Induced Holdings of Precautionary Liquidity - Implications for Bank Loan Supply and Monetary Policy Implementation, Economic Theory, forthcoming.

  • Bucher, M. and U. Neyer (2016): The Influence of the Eurosystem’s Deposit rate on Bank Loan Supply, Credit and Capital Markets 49, 221–244.

  • Butt, N., R. Churm, M. F. McMahon, A. Morotz and J. F. Schanz (2014): QE and the Bank Lending Channel in the United Kingdom, Bank of England Working Paper, No. 511.

  • Campello, M. (2002): Internal Capital Markets in Financial Conglomerates: Evidence from Small Bank Responses to Monetary Policy, The Journal of Finance 57(6),2773–2805.

  • D’Avino, C. (2018): Quantitative Easing, Global Banks and the International Bank Lending Channel, Economic Modelling 71, 234–246.

  • Deutsche Bundesbank (2016a). The Macroeconomic Impact of Quantitative Easing in the Euro Area, Deutsche Bundesbank Monthly Report, June 2016, 29–54.

  • Deutsche Bundesbank (2016b). Monetary Policy and Banking Business, Deutsche Bundesbank Monthly Report, November 2016, 20–38.

  • Deutsche Bundesbank (2018): Monetary Policy and Banking Business, Deutsche Bundesbank Monthly Report, August 2018, 21–38.

  • Eisenschmidt, J., D. Kedan, M. Schmitz, R. Adalid and P. Papsdorf (2017): The Eurosystem’s Asset Purchase Programme and TARGET Balances, ECB Occasional Paper Series 196, September 2017.

  • Ennis, H. M. (2018): A Simple General Equilibrium Model of Large Excess Reserves, Journal of Monetary Economics 98, 50–56.

  • Eser, F., M. C. Amaro, S. Iacobelli and M. Rubens (2012): The Use of the Eurosystem’s Monetary Policy Instruments and Operational Framework Since 2009, ECB Occasional Paper Series 135, August 2012.

  • European Central Bank (2009): The Implementation of Monetary Policy Since August 2007, ECB Monthly Bulletin, July 2009, 75–89.

  • European Central Bank (2010): The ECB’s Response to the Financial Crisis, ECB Monthly Bulletin, October 2010, 59–74.

  • European Central Bank (2011): The ECB’s Non-standard Measures – Impact and Phasing-Out, ECB Monthly Bulletin, July 2011, 55–69.

  • European Central Bank (2012a). The Implementation of Monetary Policy in the Euro Area. General Documentation on Eurosystem Monetary Policy Instruments and Procedures, European Central Bank, Frankfurt a.M., 2012.

  • European Central Bank (2012b). Monetary Policy Measures Decided by the Governing Council on 6 September 2012, ECB Monthly Bulletin, September 2012, 7–11.

  • European Central Bank (2014): The Targeted Longer-Term Refinancing Operation of September 2014, ECB Monthly Bulletin, October 2014, 21–23.

  • European Central Bank (2015): ECB Announces Expanded Asset Purchase Programme, Press release, 22 January 2015.

  • European Central Bank (2017): Monetary Policy Decisions, Press Release, 26 October 2017.

  • European Central Bank (2018): Liquidity Conditions and Monetary Policy Operations in the Period from 31 January to 2 May 2018, ECB Economic Bulletin 4, June 2018.

  • European Central Bank (2019a): Asset purchase programmes. accessed January( 16, 2019).

  • European Central Bank (2019b). Capital subscription. accessed January( 16, 2019).

  • European Central Bank (2019c). Taking Stock of the Eurosystem’s Asset Purchase Programme After the end of Net Asset Purchases, ECB Economic Bulletin 2, March 2019.

  • Friedman, B. M. and K. N. Kuttner (2011): Implementation of Monetary Policy: How do Central Banks Set Interest Rates? Handbook of Monetary Economics 3, 1345–1438.

  • Frutos, J. C., C. Garcia-de Andoain, F. Heider and P. Papsdorf (2016): Stressed Interbank Markets: Evidence from the European Financial and Sovereign Debt Crisis, ECB Working Paper 1925.

  • Furfine, C. H. (2000): Interbank Payments and the Daily Federal Funds Rate, Journal of Monetary Economics 46(2),535–553.

  • Gambacorta, L. and P. E. Mistrulli (2004): Does Bank Capital Affect Lending Behavior? Journal of Financial Intermediation 13(4),436–457.

  • Garcia-Posada, M. and M. Marchetti (2016): The Bank Lending Channel of Unconventional Monetary Policy: The Impact of the VLTROs on Credit Supply in Spain, Economic Modelling 58, 427–441.

  • Giansante, S., M. Fatouh and S. Ongena (2019): Does Quantitative Easing Boost Bank Lending to the Real Economy or Cause Other Bank Asset Reallocation? The case of the UK, mimeo.

  • Kashyap, A. K., R. Rajan and J. C. Stein (2002): Banks as Liquidity Providers: An Explanation for the Coexistence of Lending and Deposit-Taking, The Journal of Finance 57(1),33–73.

  • Kashyap, A. K. and J. C. Stein (1995): The Impact of Monetary Policy on Bank Balance Sheets, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 42, 151–195.

  • Kashyap, A. K. and J. C. Stein (2000): What do a Million Observations on Banks Say About the Transmission of Monetary Policy? American Economic Review 90(3),407–428.

  • Keister, T. and J. McAndrews (2009): Why are Banks Holding so Many Excess Reserves? Current Issues in Economics and Finance 15(8).

  • Kishan, R. P. and T. P. Opiela (2000): Bank Size, Bank Capital, and the Bank Lending Channel, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 32(1),121–141.

  • Lojschova, A. (2017): Did Quantitative Easing Boost Bank Lending? The Slovak Experience, Research Department, National Bank of Slovakia.

  • Martin, A., J. McAndrews, A. Palida and D. Skeie (2013): Federal Reserve Tools for Managing Rates and Reserves, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Staff Report No. 642.

  • Martin, A., J. McAndrews and D. Skeie (2016): Bank Lending in Times of Large Bank Reserves, International Journal of Central Banking 12(4),193–222.

  • Mishkin, F. S. (1996): The Channels of Monetary Transmission: Lessons for Monetary Policy, NBER Working Paper Series 5464.

  • Mishkin, F. S. (2018): The Economics of Money, Banking, and Financial Markets, Pearson, Harlow (UK), 12th ed.

  • Poole, W. (1968): Commercial Bank Reserve Management in a Stochastic Model: Implications for Monetary Policy, The Journal of Finance 23(5),769–791.

  • Rodnyansky, A. and O. M. Darmouni (2017): The Effects of Quantitative Easing on Bank Lending Behavior, The Review of Financial Studies 30(11),3858–3887.

  • Whitesell, W. (2006): Interest Rate Corridors and Reserves, Journal of Monetary Economics 53(6),1177–1195.

  • Williamson, S. D. (2019): Interest on Reserves, Interbank Lending, and Monetary Policy, Journal of Monetary Economics 101, 14–30.

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
Price including VAT
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.

Journal + Issues

The Review of Economics (Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftswissenschaften) is a peer-reviewed general interest journal publishing articles from all fields of economics with a strong policy focus. The journal aims to provide a forum for policy contributions and to influence the public debate.