Philosophy today: cries of alarm and prospects of progress

Paolo Parrini 1
  • 1 DILEF (Dipartimento di Lettere e Filosofia), Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Italy
Paolo Parrini
  • Corresponding author
  • DILEF (Dipartimento di Lettere e Filosofia), Università degli Studi di Firenze, Firenze, Toscana, Italy
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar

Abstract

Today’s critical state of philosophy is examined by considering two of its aspects: the way in which philosophy presently is ever more typically practised (increasing professionalism and specialisation) and the new challenges it has to face to keep up with the changed scientific, and more generally cultural and social context. The essay outlines some prospects of progress in the light of those which still now can be considered the proper tasks of philosophical inquiry. Such tasks are singled out through an historical survey of the original characters of philosophy and an appraisal of its theoretical motivations. The importance of the history of philosophy and the necessity of achieving a virtuous relation among the various philosophical disciplines are stressed to contrast the dangers of excess specialisation and professionalism.

  • Ayer, Alfred J. 1954. Philosophical essays. London: Macmillan.

  • Ayer, Alfred J. 1956. The problem of knowledge. London: Penguin Books.

  • Crane, Tim. 2017. Philosophy, science and the value of understanding. In K. Almqvist & I. Thomas (eds.), Sapere aude. The future of the humanities in British Universities, 175–183. Stockholm: Axel and Margaret Ax:son Johnson Foundation.

  • Dyson, Freeman. 2015. Dreams of earth and sky. New York: The New York Review of Books.

  • Einstein, Albert. 1949. Autobiographical notes & Remarks to the essays appearing in this collective volume. In P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: Philosopher-scientist, 3–95 & 665–688. New York: Tudor. 19512.

  • Feynman, Richard. 1994. No ordinary genius. ed. by C. Sykes. New York: Norton.

  • Feynman, Richard. 2015. The quotable Feynman. ed. by M. Feynman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Fodor, Jerry. 2004. Water’s water everywhere. London Review of Books 26(20). 17–19.

  • Frank, Philipp. 1941. Modern science and its philosophy. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press. 19492.

  • Frodeman, Robert. 2013. Philosophy dedisciplined. Synthese 190. 1917–1936.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Glymour, Clark. 2011. Manifesto, (http://www.newappsblog.com/2011/12/glymour-against-philosophy.html).

  • Haack, Susan. 2017. The real question: Can philosophy be saved? Free Inquiry. 40–43 October/November.

  • Hawking, Stephen & Leonard Mlodinow. 2010. The grand design. London: Bantam Books.

  • Kitcher, Philip. 2011. Philosophy inside out. Metaphilosophy 42(3). 248–260.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Malament, David. 1977. Causal theories of time and the conventionality of simultaneity. Noûs 11(3). 293–300.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Parrini, Paolo. 1995/1998. Knowledge and reality. An essay in positive philosophy. (English edition, revised, of Conoscenza e realtà. Saggio di filosofia positiva, Roma-Bari: Laterza 1995). Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1998.

  • Russell, Bertrand. 1914. On scientific method in philosophy. Reprinted in: B. Russell, Mysticism and logic and other essays, New York: Longmans, Green & Co. 19193.

  • Sellars, Wilfrid F. 1962. Philosophy and the scientific image of man. (Originally published in: R. Colodny, ed., Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press). In: W. Sellars, Science, perception and reality, 1–40. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. 19714.

  • Sommerfeld, Arnold. 1949. To Albert Einstein’s seventieth birthday. In P. A. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein: philosopher-scientist, 97–106. New York: Tudor. 19512.

  • Weinberg, Steven. 1992. Dreams of a final theory. New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Wick, Warner. 1951. The «political» philosophy of logical empiricism. Philosophical Studies 2(4). 49–57.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
  • Williamson, Timothy. 2014. How did we get here from there? The transformation of analytic philosophy. Belgrade Philosophical Annual 27. 7–37.

  • Wolters, Gereon. 2015. Globalized parochialism: Consequences of English as Lingua Franca in philosophy of science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29(2). 189–200.

    • Crossref
    • Export Citation
Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
£23.00
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


or
Log in with your institution

Journal + Issues

This journal promotes current debates in all philosophical topics, historically and systematically. The aim of SATS is that each paper not only adds to these discussions but helps scholars who are not specialists in the specific fields to understand and assess the content of the debates. Thus each paper is reviewed by an ad hoc international expert on the given subject and by an editorial board member.

Search