The following paper addresses the problem of the diachronic development of definiteness markers in Bulgarian as attested in literature. As the previous research focused on the postponed article as the main definiteness marker in present-day Bulgarian, our study compares its use with that of other markers, namely the long-form adjective and the adnominal demonstrative pronoun. The traditional view sees a steady convergence between the literary norm and the dialectal use of the article. To challenge this view, we observe the frequency of use of all definiteness markers on an empirical basis. Оur study uses a sample containing six versions of the hagiography of St Petka of Tarnovo, also known as St Parascheva of Epibates. The text for this study is provided by a historical corpus of pre-standardized Balkan Slavic literature, which is being constructed to enable us comparisons between the dialectal and diachronic data. The samples are chosen to minimalize the effects of genre, structure and content differences on the results. The frequency of individual types of definiteness markers in respective versions of the text shows that the development of the damaskini language was not only different in respect to dialectal developments in the area, but in some respects even contrary to them.
Andreov, Ivančo. 1844. Părvička bălgarska grammatika. Bukurešt: Serd. K. Penkovič.
Cejtlin, Ralja M., et al. 1994. Staroslavjanskij slovarʼ: po rukopisjam X-XI vekov. Moskva: Russkij jazyk.
Ciaramella, Roberto 1996. Novi danni za Berlinskija damaskin. In Palaeobulgarica XX (3), 120–129.
Conev 1937 XXXI = Conev, Benjo 1937. Slavjanski răkopisi na berlinskata državna biblioteka (= Sbornik na bălgarskata akademija na naukitě kn. XXXI), 1–79. Sofia: BAN.
Demina, Evgenija I. 1968. Tixonravovskij damaskin. Bolgarskij pamjatnik XVII v. Issledvanie i tekst, 1. Sofia: BAN.
Demina, Evgenija I. et al. 2012. Rečnik na knižovnija bălgarski ezik na narodna osnova ot XVII vek. Sofia: Valentin Trajanov.
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila 2009. Linearization Patterns in the Old Bulgarian Nominal Expression. In Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila & Olga M. Tomić, Investigations in the Bulgarian and Macedonian Nominal Expression, 74–94. Trondheim: Tapir.
Flier, Michael S. 1974. Aspects of Nominal Determination in Old Church Slavic. The Hague: Mouton.
Friedman, Victor A. 2006. Balkans as a Linguistic Area. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., vol. 1, 657–672. Oxford: Elsevier.
Fuchsbauer, Jürgen 2010. Die Übertragung der Dioptra ins Slavische. Wien: Universität Wien (Dissertation).
Georgiev, Vladimir I. (ed.) 1972–2006. Bălgarski etimologičen rečnik, tom I-V. Sofia: BAN.
Haarmann, Harald 1976. Aspekte der Arealtypologie: die Problematik der europäischen Sprachbünde. Tübingen: Narr.
Hansen, Björn 2004. The life cycle of a definite marker: the development of the short and long form of the adjective in Russian, Old Church Slavonic and Serbian/Croatian. In Zbornik za lingvistiku i filologiju XLVII (1–2), 51–73.
Leake, William M. 1814. Researches in Greece. London: John Boot.
Lindstedt, Jouko 2014. Balkan Slavic and Balkan Romance: From congruence to convergence. In Besters-Dilger, Juliane et al., Congruence in Contact-induced Language Change: Language Families, Typological Resemblance, and Perceived Similarity, 168–183. Boston: De Gruyter.
Lunt, Horace G. 2001. Old Church Slavonic Grammar, 7th ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zeitschrift für Slawistik publishes critical essays on languages and literatures, popular poetry, and the cultural history of Slavic peoples in the past and present. Special attention is paid to German-Slavic linguistics, literary and cultural relations within their European context, onomastics, history and poetology of literary genres, Baltic studies, Sorbian studies, and the history of Slavic studies.