This paper investigates how the Federal Reserve (Fed) and the Bank of England, Bank of Japan and the European Central Bank reacted in the aftermath of the financial crisis by making use of both conditional and unconditional interest rate quantiles regressions and data on shadow short rate of interest and a measure of uncertainty. Firstly, the unconditional quantile regression offers some support for increased reaction by the Fed as the ZLB is approached. Secondly, the decreased reaction of the Fed and other monetary policy makers towards uncertainty particularly at lower conditional quantiles of interest rates lends support to expansionary mechanism in place during this time. Hence uncertainty is key to policy reaction, and more so during episodes of crisis.
Chevapatrakul, T., T. Kim, and P. Mizen. 2009. “The Taylor Principle and Monetary Policy Approaching a Zero Bound on Nominal Rates: Quantile Regression Results for the United States and Japan.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 41: 1705–1723.
Chevapatrakul, T., T. Kim, and P. Mizen. 2009. “The Taylor Principle and Monetary Policy Approaching a Zero Bound on Nominal Rates: Quantile Regression Results for the United States and Japan.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 41: 1705–1723.10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00269.x)| false
Christou, C., R. Naraidoo, R. Gupta, and W-J. Kim. Forthcoming. Monetary Policy Reaction Functions of the TICKs: A Quantile Regression Approach. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2017.1422429.
Carlstrom, C., and T. Fuerst. 2000. Forward-looking versus backward-looking Taylor rules. Working Paper No. 009, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
Clarida, R., J. Gali, and M. Gertler. 2000. “Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (1): 147–180.
Clarida, R., J. Gali, and M. Gertler. 2000. “Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (1): 147–180.10.1162/003355300554692)| false
Dolado, J., María-Dolores, R., and M. Naveira. 2005. “Are Monetary- Policy Reaction Functions Asymmetric ?: The Role of Nonlinearity in the Phillips Curve.” European Economic Review 49: 485–503.10.1016/S0014-2921(03)00032-1)| false
Estrella, A., and F. S. Mishkin. 2000. “Rethinking the Role of NAIRU in Monetary Policy: Implications of Model Formulation and Uncertainty.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, No. 6518.
Evans, C., J. D. M. Fisher, F. Gourio, and S. Krane. 2015. “Risk Management for Monetary Policy Near the Zero Lower Bound, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,” Spring, 141–196.
Firpo, S., N. M. Fortin, and T. Lemieux. 2009. “Unconditional Quantile Regressions.” Econometrica 77: 953–973.
Greenspan, A. 2003. “Opening Remarks,” Speech at the Symposium on Monetary Policy and Uncertainty: Adapting to a Changing Economy, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, August.
Gupta, R., C.-K.-M. Lau, and M. E. Wohar. 2018. “The Impact of US Uncertainty on the Euro Area in Good and Bad Times: Evidence from a Quantile Structural Vector Autoregressive Model.” Empirica. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-018-9400-3.
Gupta, R., J. Ma, M. Risse, and M. E. Wohar. Forthcoming. “Common Business Cycles and Volatilities in US States and MSAs: The Role of Economic Uncertainty.” Journal of Macroeconomics.
Hayashi, F. 2000. Econometrics. 1st ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hansen, L. P. 1982. “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators.” Econometrica 50: 1029–1054.
Jawadi, F., and R. M. Sousa. 2014. “Modelling the Relationship between Consumption and Wealth in the US, the UK and the Euro Area.” Revue d’ Economie Politique 124 (4): 639–652.10.3917/redp.244.0639)| false
Jawadi, F., S. K. Mallick, and R. M. Sousa. 2014. “Nonlinear Monetary Policy Reaction Functions in Large Emerging Economies: The Case of Brazil and China.” Applied Economics 46 (9): 973–984.10.1080/00036846.2013.851774)| false
Jawadi, F., R. M. Sousa, and R. Traverso. 2017. “On the Macroeconomic Impact and the Wealth Effects of Unconventional Monetary Policy.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 21 (5): 1189–1204.10.1017/S1365100515000292)| false
Kohn, Donald L. 1996. “Commentary on Charles Freeman: What Operating Procedures Should Be Adopted to Maintain Price Stability? Practical Issues” 1996 Symposium Proceedings: Achieving Price Stability, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Jackson Hole, Wyoming.
Krippner, L. 2013. “A Tractable Framework for Zero Lower Bound Gaussian Term Structure Models.” Discussion Paper, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, 2013/02.
Kuttner, Kenneth N., and Adam S. Posen. 2001. “The Great Recession: Lessons from Macroeconomic Policy from Japan.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 32: 93–186.
Lee, S. 2007. “Endogeneity in Quantile Regression Models: A Control Function Approach.” Journal of Econometrics 141: 1131–1158.
Miles, W., and S. Schreyer. 2012. “Is Monetary Policy Non-Linear in Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, and Thailand? A Quantile Regression Analysis.” Asian-Pacific Economic Literature 26: 155–166.10.1111/j.1467-8411.2012.01344.x)| false
Miles, W., and S. Schreyer. 2014. “Is Monetary Policy Non-Linear in Latin America? A Quantile Regression Approach to Brazil, Chile, Mexico and Peru.” Journal of Developing Areas 48 (2): 169–183.10.1353/jda.2014.0029)| false
Orphanides, A., R. D. Porter, D. Reifschneider, R. Tetlow, and F. Finan. 2000. “Errors in the Measurement of the Output Gap and The Design of Monetary Policy.” Journal of Economics and Business 52 (1–2): 117–141.
Orphanides, A., R. D. Porter, D. Reifschneider, R. Tetlow, and F. Finan. 2000. “Errors in the Measurement of the Output Gap and The Design of Monetary Policy.” Journal of Economics and Business 52 (1–2): 117–141.10.1016/S0148-6195(99)00031-4)| false
Ruge-Murcia, F. 2003. “Does the Barro–Gordon Model Explain the Behavior of US Inflation? A Reexamination of the Empirical Evidence.” Journal of Monetary Economics 50 (6): 1375–1390.10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00083-7)| false
Sousa, J., and R. M. Sousa. 2017. “Predicting Risk Premium Under Changes in the Conditional Distribution of Stock Returns.” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money 50: 204–218.
Sousa, J., and R. M. Sousa. 2017. “Predicting Risk Premium Under Changes in the Conditional Distribution of Stock Returns.” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money 50: 204–218.10.1016/j.intfin.2017.09.002)| false
SNDE recognizes that advances in statistics and dynamical systems theory can increase our understanding of economic and financial markets. The journal seeks both theoretical and applied papers that characterize and motivate nonlinear phenomena. Researchers are required to assist replication of empirical results by providing copies of data and programs online. Algorithms and rapid communications are also published.