Similar to natural ecosystems, entrepreneurs and other entrepreneurial actors are locally interdependent and affect the performance of each other. Mostly economically larger and more successful regions have been studied by using the framework of entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs). The current study aims at further developing the theoretical understanding of EEs and applying the proposed EE model in the context of Estonia. In the study, a conceptual model of an EE is proposed, the uniqueness of which lies in merging three aspects into a single framework: the nine components of an EE, its value-added, and its phase of development. The model was applied for analysing by means of a qualitative methodology four sector-based subEEs in Estonia.
The study showed that even in a small country like Estonia the components of the EE were partly similar, but also partly unique for the subEEs. This was not due to the location, but because of sectoral differences. The difference of the development phase seemed to be related to the knowledge base of the sector.
The policy relevance of the model is that it allows looking at the elements of an EE as well as its economic value-added and development prospects. The EE approach allows addressing jointly the difficulties and challenges in the development of EEs, including the issues of digitalisation, skilled labour, and production costs, which would allow the subEEs to develop into mature and resilient networks. Not all the components of an EE have to be equally strong, but their interconnectedness determines the strength of an EE. Policy solutions need to be tailored to the needs of specific subEEs based on the knowledge base and inner dynamics of the sectors.
Asheim, B. T./Gertler, M. S. (2005): The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. In: Fagerberg, J./Mowery D.C./Nelson R. (Eds.): The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford, 291–317.
Asheim, B. T./Coenen, L./Vang, J. (2007): Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. In: Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25(5), 655–670.
Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs (ANDE). (2013): Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Diagnostic Toolkit. Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs.
Audretsch, D. B./Belitski, M. (2017): Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. In: The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1030–1051 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8
Boschma, R. (2005): Role of proximity in interaction and performance: Conceptual and empirical challenges. In: Regional Studies, 39(1), 41–45.
Brown, R./Mason, C. (2017): Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. In: Small Business Economics, 49(1), 11–30 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7
Cukier, D./Kon, F./Krueger, N. (2015): Towards a Software Startup Ecosystems Maturity Model, PROFES’2015 Workshop on Software Startups. Bolzano, 600–606. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8edb/9fff98fa7fe91006d9ed3966b28b2bc037f4.pdf
GEM 2016/2017 Global Report. (2017): The Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA). http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49812
GEDI. Global Entrepreneurship Index 2017. (2017): The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute (GEDI), Washington, D.C., USA. http://thegedi.org/product/2017-global-entrepreneurship-index/
Hsieh, H. F./Shannon, S. E. (2005): Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. In: Qual. Health Res., 15 (9), 1277–1288.
Isaksen, A. (2005): Regional clusters building on local and non- local relationships: a European comparison. In: A. Lagendijk, A./Oinas, P. (Eds.): Proximity, Distance and Diversity: Issues on Economic Interaction and Local Development. Aldershot, 129–152.
Isenberg, D. (2011): The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Dublin.
Lagerspetz, M. (2017) Ühiskonna uurimise meetodid: sissejuhatus ja väljajuhatus. Tallinn: Tallinna Ülikooli Kirjastus.
Mack, E./Mayer, H. (2016): The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118–2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586547
Malecki, E. J. (2018): Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography Compass (In Press). https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12359
Mason, C/Brown, R. (2014): Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. Background paper prepared for the workshop organised by the OECD LEED Programme and the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs on Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship. The Hague.
Miles, M. B./Huberman, M. A./Saldaña, J. (2014) Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. Los Angeles: SAGE.
Nicotra, M./Romano, M./Del Giudice, M./Schillaci, C. E. (2017): The Causal Relation Between Entrepreneurial Ecosystem and Productive Entrepreneurship. In: The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10961-017-9628-2
Raudsaar, M. (2010): Silicon Valley ökosüsteem, selle kasutus- ja rakendusvõimalused Eestis. Fenomenoloogiline uurimus. Silicon Valley; Tartu.
Roundy, P. T. (2017): “Small town” entrepreneurial ecosystems: Implications for developed and emerging economies. In: Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 9(3), 238–262 https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2016-0040
Spigel, B./Harrison, R. (2017): Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. In: Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268
Spigel, B. (2017): The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
Stam, E. (2015): Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484
Sternberger, Bloh, Coduras (2019): A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, xx(x), xx-xx. DOI…
The Global Competitiveness Report 2017–2018. (2017): World Economic Forum. Geneva. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2017-2018
Tödtling, F./Grillitsch, M. (2014): Does combinatorial knowledge lead to a better innovation performance of firms? In: SRE – Discussion Papers, 2014/07. WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna.
Tödtling, F./Trippl, M. (2005): Networking and project organisation in the Styrian automotive industry. In: Lagendijk, A./Oinas, P. (Eds.): Proximity, Distance and Diversity: Issues on Eco- nomic Interaction and Local Development. Aldershot, 89–110.
World Economic Forum (WEF). (2013): Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Company Growth Dynamics. Report Summary for the Annual Meeting of the New Champions 2013. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EntrepreneurialEcosystems_Report_2013.pdf
World Economic Forum (WEF). (2014): Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Early-Stage Company Growth Dynamics. Geneva: World Economic Forum. http://reports.weforum.org/entrepreneurial-ecosystems-around-the-globe-and-early-stage-company-growth-dynamics/wp-content/blogs.dir/34/mp/files/pages/files/nme-entrepreneurship-report-jan-8-2014.pdf
Yin, R.K. (2009): Case Study Research. Design and Methods, 4th ed. Los Angeles.
The primary focus of the German Journal for Economic Geography (ZFW) is on theory-led empirical research about spatial economic structures and regional dynamics. ZFW, which is the only scientific journal on Economic Geography in German speaking countries, addresses scientists and students as well as decision makers in private firms and economic promotion agencies.