Operationalising relational theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems at city-level in Africa, Asia and the Middle East

Nadina Iacob, Nicolas Friederici
  • Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society, Französische Straße 9, 10117 Berlin, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, 1 St Giles, 1 St Giles Oxford, Oxford OX1 3JS, United Kingdom, Berlin, Germany
  • Email
  • Search for other articles:
  • degruyter.comGoogle Scholar
and Jan Lachenmayer

Abstract

Relational theory has been a key advancement in understanding how entrepreneurial ecosystems work. However, the theory has not yet been operationalised through measurement methodologies. This study proposes an indicator-based framework and composite index methodology which builds on relational ecosystem theory. Starting from the premise that common aggregation methods like the arithmetic mean fail to convey the interdependence of ecosystem components (such as complementarity vs. substitution), this study explores the potential of geometric mean as an alternative approach. Our analysis shows that geometric mean methods render more plausible results than simple arithmetic mean; they operationalise complementarity between components more directly by introducing heftier penalties for imbalances in the ecosystem. Additionally, our methodology identifies the less-explored city-level as the most meaningful unit of analysis of entrepreneurial ecosystems. To test the index, we use a unique set of quantitative data for eleven middle-income cities, namely Accra, Amman, Bangkok, Beirut, Bengaluru, Cairo, Jakarta, Manila, Nairobi, Rabat, and Tunis. As most previously conducted measurements have targeted either mature or country ecosystems, our goal is not limited to methodological advancements in measuring entrepreneurial ecosystems, but it also relates to expanding the current status of research to less explored world regions.

  • Acs, Z. J. et al. (2017a). ‘The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach’, Small Business Economics, 49(1), pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9864-8.

  • Ács, Z. J. et al. (2017b). ‘The Global Entrepreneurship Index’. Washington D.C. Available at: https://thegedi.org.

  • Alvedalen, J. and Boschma, R. (2017). ‘A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: towards a future research agenda’, European Planning Studies, 25(6), pp. 887–903. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694.

  • Aspen Network of Development Entrepreneurs. (2013) Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Diagnostic Toolkit. Available at: https://assets.aspeninstitute.org/content/uploads/files/content/docs/pubs/FINAL%20Ecosystem%20Toolkit%20Draft_print%20version.pdf (Accessed at: 29 August 2018).

  • Audretsch, D. B. and Belitski, M. (2017). ‘Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Cities – Establishing the Framework Conditions’, Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5). doi: 10.1007/s1096101694738.

  • Autio, E. et al. (2017). ‘Digital Affordances, Spatial Affordances, and the Genesis of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.

  • Brown, R. and Mason, C. (2017). ‘Looking inside the spiky bits: a critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems’, Small Business Economics, 49(1), pp. 11–30. doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9865-7.

  • Bruns, K. et al. (2017). ‘Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach’, Small Bus Economics, 49, pp. 31–54. doi: 10.1007/s11187-017-9866-6.

  • Cerulli, G. and Filippetti, A. (2010). ‘Substitutability vs. Complementarity: Rethinking STI Composite Indicators Building with an Application of Sensitivity Analysis’, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier, 2(6), pp. 7633–7635. doi: 10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2010.05.153.

  • Cohen, B. (2006). ‘Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.428.

  • Credit, K., Mack, E. A., & Mayer, H. (2018). State of the field: Data and metrics for geographic analyses of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geography compass, e12380.

  • Fritsch, M. and Wyrwich, M. (2014). ‘The Long Persistence of Regional Levels of Entrepreneurship: Germany, 1925–2005’, Regional Studies, 48(6), pp. 955–973. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2013.816414.

  • Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (2018). ‘About – GEM Wiki’. Available at: https://www.gemconsortium.org/about/news (Accessed at: 29 August 2018).

  • Guzman, J., Stern, S. (2016), ‘Nowcasting And Placecasting Entrepreneurial Quality And Performance’.

  • Isenberg, D. (2011). The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship, Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project. Available at: http://entrepreneurial-revolution.com/2011/05/11/the-entrepreneurship-ecosystem-strategy-as-a-new-paradigm-for-economic-policy-principles-for-cultivating-entrepreneurship/ (Accessed: 10 March 2018).

  • Isenberg, D. J. (2014). ‘What an Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Actually Is’, Harvard Business Review.

  • Kalla, S. (2009). Geometric Mean. Retrieved Jul 29, 2018 from Explorable.com: https://explorable.com/geometric-mean, date accessed: 5 August 2018.

  • KumarSen, P. (1987). What do the arithmetic, geometric and harmonic means tell us in length-biased sampling?, Statistics & Probability Letters, Volume 5, Issue 2, March 1987, pp 95–98.

  • Liao J. G., Arthur Berg. (2018). Sharpening Jensen’s Inequality. The American Statistician, pp 1–4.

  • Mack, E. and Mayer, H. (2016). ‘The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems’, Urban Studies, 53(10), pp. 2118–2133. doi: 10.1177/0042098015586547.

  • Mason, C. and Brown, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdf (Accessed: 16 March 2018).

  • Motoyama, Y. and Knowlton, K. (2017). ‘Examining the Connections within the Startup Ecosystem: A Case Study of St. Louis’, Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 7(1). doi: 10.1515/erj-2016-0011.

  • Motoyama, Y. and Watkins, K. K. (2014). Examining the Connections within the Startup Ecosystem: A Case Study of St. Louis. Kansas City. Available at: https://www.kauffman.org/what-we-do/research/a-research-compendium-entrepreneurship-ecosystems/examining-the-connections-within-the-startup-ecosystem-a-case-study-of-st-louis (Accessed: 22 March 2018).

  • Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., & Corbett, A. C. (2004). ‘An Entrepreneurial System View of New Venture Creation’, Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2004.00105.x.

  • Nicotra, M. et al. (2017). ‘The causal relation between entrepreneurial ecosystem and productive entrepreneurship: a measurement framework’, The Journal of Technology Transfer, pp. 1–34. doi: 10.1007/s10961-017-9628-2.

  • OECD and European Commission Joint Research Center. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators METHODOLOGY AND USER GUIDE. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/std/42495745.pdf (Accessed: 10 March 2017).

  • Ortega Argiles, R, Acs, ZJ, Szerb, L, Autio, E & Komlosi, E. (2014). ‘REDI: The Regional Entrepreneurship and Development Index –Measuring regional entrepreneurship’. Publications Office of the European Union. DOI: 10.2776/79241.

  • Spigel, B. (2017). ‘The Relational Organization of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), pp. 49–72. doi: 10.1111/etap.12167.

  • Spigel, B. and Harrison, R. (2017). ‘Towards a Process Theory of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. doi: 10.1002/sej.1268.

  • Stam, E. (2015). ‘Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique’, European Planning Studies, 23(9), pp. 1759–1769. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484.

  • Stam, E. & Spigel, B. (2018). ‘Entrepreneurial Ecosystems’, In: Blackburn, R., De Clercq, D., & Heinonen, J. (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Small Business and Entrepreneurship. London: SAGE.

  • Startup Genome. (2018). ‘Global Startup Ecosystem Report 2018. Succeeding in the New Era of Technology. Available at: https://startupgenome.com (Accessed: 16 March 2018).

  • Sternberger et al. (2018) ‘A new framework to measure entrepreneurial ecosystems at the regional level’. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie. pp. 1–25.

  • The Kauffmann Index (2018). https://www.kauffman.org/kauffman-index (Accessed: 28 August 2018).

  • World Economic Forum. (2014). Entrepreneurial Ecosystems around the Globe and Early-Stage Company Growth Dynamics – Reports – World Economic Forum. Available at: http://reports.weforum.org/entrepreneurial-ecosystems-around-the-globe-and-early-stage-company-growth-dynamics/ (Accessed: 22 March 2018).

Purchase article
Get instant unlimited access to the article.
$42.00
Price including VAT
Log in
Already have access? Please log in.


Journal + Issues

The primary focus of the German Journal for Economic Geography (ZFW) is on theory-led empirical research about spatial economic structures and regional dynamics. ZFW, which is the only scientific journal on Economic Geography in German speaking countries, addresses scientists and students as well as decision makers in private firms and economic promotion agencies.

Search