Open Physics: Ever-New “Loopholes” in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
Karl Hess, Center for Advanced Study, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA
Hans De Raedt, Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Netherlands
Andrei Khrennikov, Mathematics, Linneus University Växjö, Sweden
Recent publications have produced claims that certain experimental results contradict Bell-type inequalities, are free of “loopholes” and, therefore, necessitate the existence of instantaneous influences at a distance.
This issue deals with contributions that examine the validity of these claims from a mathematical-physical and computational-modeling point of view.
HOW TO SUBMIT
Before submission authors should carefully read the Instructions for Authors, which are located at https://www.degruyter.com/view/supplement/s23915471_Instruction_for_authors.pdf
All submissions to the Special Issue must be made electronically at http://www.editorialmanager.com/openphys/default.aspx and will undergo the standard peer-review system. When entering your submission choose the option Special Issue on Ever-New “Loopholes” in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests.
Special Issue: Ever New "Loopholes" in Bell’s Argument and Experimental Tests
Hess, Karl / De Raedt, Hans / Khrennikov, Andrei
Rhetoric, logic, and experiment in the quantum nonlocality debate
Graft, Donald A.
What If Quantum Theory Violates All Mathematics?
Rosinger, Elemér Elad
The photon identification loophole in EPRB experiments: computer models with single-wing selection
De Raedt, Hans / Michielsen, Kristel / Hess, Karl
Bohr against Bell: complementarity versus nonlocality
Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell tests?
Bell’s “Theorem”: loopholes vs. conceptual flaws
Kracklauer, A. F.
Nonrecurrence and Bell-like inequalities
Danforth, Douglas G.