Corrigendum to: Corrosion Reviews 2014; 32(3-4): 101–128.

DOI 10.1515/corrrev-2014-0027

In the previously published article, equations 3, 4 and 9 were wrong. The authors regret the mistakes. The correct equations are:

$$M_s=539\text{-}423\cdot C\text{-}30.4\cdot Mn\text{-}17.7\cdot Ni\text{-}12.1\cdot Cr\text{-}7.5\cdot Mo\text{\hspace{1em}(3)}$$(3)

$$V_{\gamma }=exp[\text{-}0.011\cdot \mathrm{(}{M}_s\text{-}{T}_q\mathrm{)}],validfor{M}_s>T_q>\text{-}80°C\text{\hspace{1em}(4)}$$(4)

$$J_{ss}=\text{-}{D}_{lat}\cdot \partial C/\partial x=D_{lat}\cdot C_0/L\text{\hspace{1em}(9)}$$(9)

Additionally, in page 20 where it says “Against current NACE TM0177 recommendations (NACE, 1996), which suggest to clean the specimens mechanically to remove corrosion products or to conduct cross-section analysis, Dunlop bent the specimens after removing them from the environment to evaluate the presence of cracks. Thus, it cannot be stated whether the cracks grew in the environment or after removal from the environment during the bending step, where pits and trenches could act as stress raisers, as criticized by Craig (1982)”. it should say “Current NACE TM0177 recommendations (NACE, 1996) suggest to clean the specimens mechanically to remove corrosion products or to conduct cross-section analysis, and to bend the specimens after removing them from the environment to evaluate the presence of cracks. During the bending step pits and trenches could act as stress raisers, as criticized by Craig (1982)”.

About the article

Corresponding author: Mariano Kappes, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Instituto Sabato (UNSAM/CNEA), Av. Gral. Paz 1499, San Martín, Buenos Aires 1650, Argentina, e-mail:

---

Published Online: 2015-03-02

Published in Print: 2015-03-01

---

Citation Information: Corrosion Reviews, Volume 33, Issue 1-2, Pages 99–99, ISSN (Online) 2191-0316, ISSN (Print) 0334-6005, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/corrrev-2014-0058.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter.