Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Official Journal of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine

Editor-in-Chief: Dudenhausen, MD, FRCOG, Joachim W.

Editorial Board Member: / Bancalari, Eduardo / Greenough, Anne / Genc, Mehmet R. / Chervenak, Frank A. / Chappelle, Joseph / Bergmann, Renate L. / Bernardes, J.F. / Bevilacqua, G. / Blickstein, Isaac / Cabero Roura, Luis / Carbonell-Estrany, Xavier / Carrera, Jose M. / D`Addario, Vincenzo / D'Alton, MD, Mary E. / Dimitrou, G. / Grunebaum, Amos / Hentschel, Roland / Köpcke, W. / Kawabata, Ichiro / Keirse, Marc J.N.C. / Kurjak M.D., Asim / Lee, Ben H. / Levene, Malcolm / Lockwood, Charles J. / Marsal, Karel / Makatsariya, Alexander / Nishida, Hiroshi / Papp, Zoltán / Pejaver, Ranjan Kumar / Pooh, Ritsuko K. / Romero, Roberto / Saugstad, Ola D. / Schenker, Joseph G. / Sen, Cihat / Seri, Istvan / Vetter, Klaus / Winn, Hung N. / Young, Bruce K. / Zimmermann, Roland

9 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 1.577
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.705

CiteScore 2016: 1.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.602
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.832

Online
ISSN
1619-3997
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 43, Issue 2 (Mar 2015)

Issues

Intrapartum ultrasound prior to Kristeller maneuver: an observational study

Marcos Javier Cuerva / Pablo Tobias / Jose Angel Espinosa / Jose Luis Bartha
Published Online: 2014-07-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2014-0079

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the accuracy of criteria followed by obstetricians when performing a Kristeller maneuver in cases of prolonged second stage of labor.

Methods: In this prospective observational study, the station of the fetal head was measured using the angle of progression (intrapartum ultrasound) just prior to the intervention of the managing obstetrician in 52 women with prolonged second stage of labor. The managing obstetricians were blinded to the sonographic results. The decision of performing a Kristeller maneuver was taken by the obstetricians based on digital palpation and their experience. Delivery mode, Apgar score, umbilical artery pH value, episiotomy, perineal tears, bleeding, and time to delivery were recorded.

Results: Kristeller maneuver was performed in 36/52 (69.2%) cases. There were no significant differences between the Kristeller and the non-Kristeller group regarding the angle of progression. There were no significant differences between both groups with respect to delivery mode, perineal tears, episiotomy, bleeding, Apgar score, and umbilical artery pH value.

Conclusions: Our study failed to define any criteria followed by obstetricians when performing a Kristeller maneuver in cases of prolonged second stage of labor. There was no relation between the angle of progression and the decision to perform a Kristeller maneuver.

Keywords: Angle of progression; intrapartum ultrasound; Kristeller maneuver

References

  • [1]

    Acanfora L, Rampon M, Filippeschi M, Marchi M, Montisci M, Viel G, et al. An inflatable ergonomic 3-chamber fundal pressure belt to assist vaginal delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013;120:78–81.Web of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [2]

    Api O, Balcin ME, Ugurel V, Api M, Turan C, Unal O. The effect of uterine fundal pressure on the duration of the second stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:320–4.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [3]

    Barbera AF, Pombar X, Perugino G, Lezotte DC, Hobbins JC. A new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33: 313–9.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4]

    Cuerva MJ, Bamberg C, Tobias P, Gil MM, De La Calle M, Bartha JL. Use of intrapartum ultrasound in the prediction of complicated operative forceps delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43:687–92.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5]

    Dückelmann AM, Bamberg C, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Nonnenmacher A, Dudenhausen JW, et al. Measurement of fetal head descent using the “angle of progression” on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:216–22.Web of ScienceCrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [6]

    Dupuis O, Silveira R, Zentner A, Dittmar A, Gaucherand P, Cucherat M, et al. Birth simulator: reliability of transvaginal assessment of fetal head station as defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:868–74.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7]

    Ghi T, Farina A, Pedrazzi A, Rizzo N, Pelusi G, Pilu G. Diagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33:331–6.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [8]

    Henrich W, Dudenhausen J, Fuchs I, Kämena A, Tutschek B. Intrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extraction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:753–60.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [9]

    Hoogsteder PH, Pijnenborg JM. Use of uterine fundal pressure maneuver at vaginal delivery and risk of severe perineal laceration. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;281:579–80.Google Scholar

  • [10]

    Kalache KD, Dückelmann AM, Michaelis SA, Lange J, Cichon G, Dudenhausen JW. Transperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the “angle of progression” predict the mode of delivery? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009;33: 326–30.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11]

    Kline-Kaye V, Miller-Slade D. The use of fundal pressure during the second stage of labor. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1990;19:511–7.Google Scholar

  • [12]

    Merhi ZO, Awonuga AO. The role of uterine fundal pressure in the management of the second stage of labor: a reappraisal. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60:599–603.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13]

    Molina FS, Terra R, Carrillo MP, Puertas A, Nicolaides KH. What is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36: 493–9.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [14]

    Pignotti MS, Fiorini P, Donzelli G, Messineo A. Neonatal hemoperitoneum: unexpected birth trauma with fatal consequences. J Clin Neonatol. 2013;2:143–5.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [15]

    Sartore A, De Seta F, Maso G, Ricci G, Alberico S, Borelli M, et al. The effects of uterine fundal pressure (Kristeller maneuver) on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;286:1135–9.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • [16]

    Sultan AH, Thakar R. Lower genital tract and anal sphincter trauma. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gyanecol. 2002;16:99–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17]

    Torkildsen EA, Salvesen KÅ, Eggebø TM. Prediction of delivery mode with transperineal ultrasound in women with prolonged first stage of labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:702–8.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18]

    Tutschek B, Braun T, Chantraine F, Henrich W. A study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descent. BJOG. 2011;118:62–9.PubMedWeb of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [19]

    Tutschek B, Torkildsen EA, Eggebø TM. Comparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:425–9.PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [20]

    Weerasekera DS, Premaratne S. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;22:344–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • [21]

    Zetterström J, López A, Anzén B, Norman M, Holmström B, Mellgren A. Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;94:21–8.CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

About the article

Corresponding author: Marcos Javier Cuerva, MD, Department of Obstetrics, Quiron San Jose Hospital, Cartagena, 111, 28002 Madrid, Spain, Tel.: +34 677026551, E-mail:


Received: 2014-03-04

Accepted: 2014-06-30

Published Online: 2014-07-17

Published in Print: 2015-03-01


Citation Information: Journal of Perinatal Medicine, ISSN (Online) 1619-3997, ISSN (Print) 0300-5577, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2014-0079.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in