Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Open Theology

Editor-in-Chief: Taliaferro, Charles

Covered by:
Elsevier - SCOPUS
Clarivate Analytics - Emerging Sources Citation Index

CiteScore 2018: 0.37

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.275
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.975

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Higgs Boson, The God Particle, and the Correlation Between Scientific and Religious Narratives

Lorns-Olaf Stahlberg
Published Online: 2015-10-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2015-0020


The Higgs mechanism – as part of the Standard Model of Elementary Particle Physics – is mostly considered to be a real physical process that brings about the mass of every elementary particle. Recent discussions show that there are alternative interpretations of it, differing from the common one in the spectrum and the features of some specific physical objects. This, in turn, shows that the problem of reference remains unsolved for physical theories: It is not obvious what kind of objects theoretical terms exactly refer to. Given the fact that the reference to the object level is ambiguous even in the natural sciences, what correlations can be established between scientific terms and religious expressions at all? Do ontic ambiguities make the dialogue between science and religion easier or more complicated? This article reflects on these questions by examining the possible significations (and interrelations) of scientific and religious signs in general as well as from the perspective of the individual. I suggest that religious storytelling and ritual practices can establish specific associations between scientific and religious worldviews under certain conditions – without confusing the different world-views conceptually.

Keywords: Higgs mechanism; semiotics; category mistake; metaphor; ritual


  • ATLAS Collaboration. “Observation of a New Particle in the Search for the Standard Model Higgs Boson with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC.” Physics Letters, B 716 (2012), 1-29. And: arXiv: 1207.7214 [hep-ex], 2012. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bieritz, Karl-Heinrich. Zeichen setzen. Beiträge zu Gottesdienst und Predigt. Stuttgart and Berlin and Cologne: Kohlhammer, 1995. Google Scholar

  • CERN press office. “The Higgs boson.” http://press.web.cern.ch/backgrounders/higgs-boson, downloaded at March 22nd, 2015. Google Scholar

  • CMS Collaboration. “Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC.” Physics Letters, B 716 (2012), 30 et seq. And: arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex], 2012. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Eco, Umberto. Einführung in die Semiotik (1972). Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 8th edition 2002. Google Scholar

  • Engemann, Wilfried. “Kommunikation des Evangeliums als interdisziplinäres Projekt. Praktische Theologie im Dialog mit außertheologischen Wissenschaften.” In Praktische Theologie. Eine Theorie- und Problemgeschichte, edited by Christian Grethlein and Helmut Schwier, Leipzig: Ev. Verlagsanstalt, 2007, 137-232. Google Scholar

  • Engemann, Wilfried. Semiotische Homiletik. Prämissen – Analysen – Konsequenzen. Tübingen and Basel: Francke, 1993. Google Scholar

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Die Aktualität des Schönen. Stuttgart: Reclam, 1977. Google Scholar

  • Goodman, Nelson. Languages of Art. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett, 2nd edition 1976. Google Scholar

  • Hansen, Rahlf. “Kepler und der Stern von Bethlehem.” Sterne und Weltraum, 1-2010, 42-47. Google Scholar

  • Jonkers, Peter. “Living as if God exists: Looking for a Common Ground in Times of Radical Pluralism.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 6 (2014), 111-132. Google Scholar

  • Kant, Immanuel. „Kritik der reinen Vernunft“ (Königsberg 1781/1787). In Studienausgabe von Kants drei erkenntniskritischen Hauptwerken, edited by Ingeborg Heidemann et al., Stuttgart: Reclam, 1966. Google Scholar

  • Kant, Immanuel. „Kritik der Urteilskraft“ (Königsberg 1790). In Immanuel Kant. Kritik der Urteilskraft, edited by Heiner F. Klemme, Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2001. Google Scholar

  • Lederman, Leon M. and Dick Teresi. The God Particle. If the Universe Is the Answer, What Is the Question? Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2006. Google Scholar

  • Lyre, Holger. “Does the Higgs Mechanism Exist?” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 22 (2008), 119-133. And: arXiv:0806.1359v1 [physics.gen-ph], philSci-archive:4073, 2008. Google Scholar

  • Meyer-Blanck, Michael. Vom Symbol zum Zeichen. Symboldidaktik und Semiotik. Rheinbach: CMZ, 2nd edition 2002. Google Scholar

  • Nagl, Ludwig. Charles Sanders Peirce. Frankfurt (Main) and New York: Campus, 1992. Google Scholar

  • Noether, Emmy. “Invariante Variationsprobleme.” Nachrichten der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Mathematisch-Physikalische Klasse (1918), 235-257. Google Scholar

  • Pape, Helmut. Charles S. Peirce zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius, 2004. Google Scholar

  • Peters, Ted and Carl Peterson. “The Higgs Boson: An Adventure in Critical Realism.” Theology and Science, 11 (2013), 185-207. Google Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. “A Guess at the Riddle.” In The Essential Peirce, edited by Nathan Houser and Christian Kloesel, Vol. 1, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1992, 245-279. Google Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. “A Syllabus of Certain Topics of Logic” (1903). In The Essential Peirce, edited by Nathan Houser et al., Vol. 2, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1998, 258-299. Google Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. “Elements of Logic”. In Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, Vol. I/II, Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1965, 2.274-2.308. Google Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. “Phenomenology.” In Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, Vol. I/II, Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1965, 1.284 et seq. Google Scholar

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders. “To William James” (Correspondence). In Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, edited by Arthur W. Burks, Vol. VIII, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1958, 8.249-8.315. Google Scholar

  • Ryle, Gilbert. The Concept of Mind (1949). London and New York: Routledge, 2009. Google Scholar

  • Stahlberg, Lorns-Olaf. “Ein Universum für alles? Anmerkungen zum naturwissenschaftlichen Kosmosbegriff im Angesicht paulinischer Theologie.“ In Gibt es eine Ordnung des Universums? Der Kosmos zwischen Messung, Anschauung und religiöser Deutung, edited by Frank Vogelsang, Hubert Meisinger and Thorsten Moos, Bonn: Ev. Akademie im Rheinland, 2012, 329-337. Google Scholar

  • Stahlberg, Lorns-Olaf. “Gebetsfehler. Das Gebet als Quelle produktiver Kategorienfehler im Spannungsfeld komplementärer Weltauffassungen.” Evangelische Theologie, 70 (2010), 369-389. Google Scholar

  • Stahlberg, Lorns-Olaf. “Wortvergegenwärtigungen. Liturgie zwischen hermeneutischer Identität und ästhetischer Vollkommenheit.” Evangelische Theologie, 66 (2006), 277-296. Google Scholar

  • Wüthrich, Adrian. “Eating Goldstone bosons in a phase transition: A critical review of Lyre’s analysis of the Higgs mechanism.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 43 (2012), 281-287. And: philSci-archive:9384, 2010. Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-06-24

Accepted: 2015-09-23

Published Online: 2015-10-27

Citation Information: Open Theology, Volume 1, Issue 1, ISSN (Online) 2300-6579, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2015-0020.

Export Citation

©2015 Lorns-Olaf Stahlberg. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in