Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Radiochimica Acta

International Journal for chemical aspects of nuclear science and technology

Editor-in-Chief: Qaim, Syed M.


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.202

CiteScore 2017: 1.22

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.409
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.869

Online
ISSN
2193-3405
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 98, Issue 9-11

Issues

A comparative batch sorption and time-resolved laser fluorescence spectroscopy study on the sorption of Eu(III) and Cm(III) on synthetic and natural kaolinite

N. Huittinen / Thomas Rabung
  • 1 Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, Institut für Nukleare Entsorgung, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Deutschland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ P. Andrieux / Jukka Lehto
  • 3 University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, Lab of Radiochemistry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finnland
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ H. Geckeis
Published Online: 2010-11-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2010.1761

Abstract

Eu(III) and Cm(III) sorption onto synthetic and natural kaolinite (St. Austell, UK) were studied by batch sorption experiments and time-resolved laser fluorescence spectroscopy (TRLFS). All investigations were performed under argon atmosphere (O2<1 ppm). 0.1 M NaClO4 and 0.25 g/L kaolinite were used as electrolyte and solid concentrations, respectively, throughout the study. Batch sorption experiments were performed with Eu(III), a homologue to trivalent actinides at three different metal ion concentrations between 6.6×10−8 and 6.6×10−6 M. pH-dependent sorption was found to be congruent for the two lowest Eu(III) concentrations (6.6×10−8 and 6.6×10−7 M) while a shift of the sorption distribution coefficient, Kd, to higher pH values was observed for the highest metal ion concentration (6.6×10−6 M). Furthermore, the natural kaolinite showed higher uptake of Eu(III) for the lowest metal ion concentration at pH<5 as compared to the synthetic product. This difference is believed to arise from a higher amount of Eu(III) being sorbed as outer-sphere species on the natural kaolinite due to its negative surface charge being higher than that of the synthetic mineral. The spectroscopic investigations were performed with 2×10−7 M Cm(III) as a luminescent probe. Four single component spectra could be extracted from the recorded emission spectra for both the synthetic and the natural kaolinite, with peak positions in average at 598.8, 602.7, 607.4 and 611.0 nm. The three first emission peaks appearing between pH 5 and 13 were assigned to three inner-sphere Cm-complexes. The fourth emission peak appearing in the alkaline pH range (>9) is assumed to be a result of Cm(III) incorporation by a surface precipitate of hitherto unknown composition.

Keywords: Sorption; Cm(III); Eu(III); TRLFS; Synthetic kaolinite

About the article

* Correspondence address: University of Helsinki, Department of Chemistry, P. O. Box 55, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finnland,


Published Online: 2010-11-23

Published in Print: 2010-11-01


Citation Information: Radiochimica Acta International journal for chemical aspects of nuclear science and technology, Volume 98, Issue 9-11, Pages 613–620, ISSN (Print) 0033-8230, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1524/ract.2010.1761.

Export Citation

© by Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag, University of Helsinki, Germany.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Manuel Eibl, Sinikka Virtanen, Felix Pischel, Frank Bok, Satu Lönnrot, Samuel Shaw, and Nina Huittinen
Applied Surface Science, 2019
[2]
[3]
Parveen Kumar Verma and Prasanta Kumar Mohapatra
RSC Adv., 2016, Volume 6, Number 87, Page 84464
[4]
Tomas Kupcik, Thomas Rabung, Johannes Lützenkirchen, Nicolas Finck, Horst Geckeis, and Thomas Fanghänel
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2016, Volume 461, Page 215
[5]
Yubing Sun, Jiaxing Li, and Xiangke Wang
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2014, Volume 140, Page 621
[6]
Nina Huittinen, Priit Sarv, and Jukka Lehto
Applied Clay Science, 2013, Volume 80-81, Page 182
[7]
Horst Geckeis, Johannes Lützenkirchen, Robert Polly, Thomas Rabung, and Moritz Schmidt
Chemical Reviews, 2013, Volume 113, Number 2, Page 1016
[8]
N. Huittinen, Th. Rabung, A. Schnurr, M. Hakanen, J. Lehto, and H. Geckeis
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 2012, Volume 99, Page 100
[9]
Kiel Holliday, Aurélie Chagneau, Moritz Schmidt, Francis Claret, Thorsten Schäfer, and Thorsten Stumpf
Dalton Transactions, 2012, Volume 41, Number 13, Page 3642
[10]
Keisuke Ishida, Takumi Saito, Noboru Aoyagi, Takaumi Kimura, Ryuji Nagaishi, Shinya Nagasaki, and Satoru Tanaka
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2012, Volume 374, Number 1, Page 258
[11]
N. Huittinen, P. Sarv, and J. Lehto
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2011, Volume 361, Number 1, Page 252
[12]
David S. Urch
Annual Reports Section "A" (Inorganic Chemistry), 2011, Volume 107, Page 519

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in