Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Semiotica

Journal of the International Association for Semiotic Studies / Revue de l'Association Internationale de Sémiotique

Editor-in-Chief: Danesi, Marcel


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.183
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.283

CiteScore 2017: 0.23

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.228
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.634

Agenzia Nazionale di Valutazione del Sistema Universitario e della Ricerca: Classe A

Online
ISSN
1613-3692
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 2011, Issue 187

Issues

An inconvenient truth? Can a film really affect psychological mood and our explicit attitudes towards climate change?

Geoffrey Beattie / Laura Sale / Laura Mcguire
Published Online: 2011-09-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.066

Abstract

Previous research has claimed that providing people with information about global warming may have a negative (and unanticipated) effect on their explicit attitudes towards climate change. One study found that more informed respondents felt less personally responsible for global warming and also showed less concern for the problem as a whole. This earlier study was, however, correlational in design and did not allow for firm conclusions regarding the direction of causality. For this reason, in our study we used an experimental approach — highly informative (and emotional) clips from An Inconvenient Truth were played to sets of participants and their mood states were measured as well as their explicit social attitudes/social cognitions on five critical scales (message acceptance/motivation to do something about climate change/empowerment/shifting responsibility for climate change/fatalism). Our study found that the clips did affect emotion, and in particular, they decreased the happiness and calmness levels of our participants, but they also felt more motivated to do something about climate change, more able to do something about climate change and, in addition, they were significantly less likely to think that they had no control over the whole climate change process. These were much more optimistic conclusions than the previous study had allowed, and they remind us of the power of strong informative and emotional messages on explicit attitude change and social cognition generally.

Keywords:: climate change; An Inconvenient Truth; emotion and global warming; explicit attitude to climate change

About the article

Published Online: 2011-09-29

Published in Print: 2011-10-01


Citation Information: Semiotica, Volume 2011, Issue 187, Pages 105–125, ISSN (Online) 1613-3692, ISSN (Print) 0037-1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.066.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Geoffrey Beattie and Laura McGuire
Environment and Behavior, 2018, Page 001391651880857
[4]
Susie Wang, Adam Corner, Daniel Chapman, and Ezra Markowitz
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2018, Page e509
[5]
Manjana Milkoreit
International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 2017
[6]
Silja Sollberger, Thomas Bernauer, and Ulrike Ehlert
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2017, Volume 51, Page 46
[7]
Geoffrey Beattie
Nature Climate Change, 2011, Volume 1, Number 8, Page 372

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in