Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 1, 2006

Environmental and economic comparison of waste solvent treatment options

Tamas Benko, Agnes Szanyi, Peter Mizsey and Zsolt Fonyo
From the journal Open Chemistry

Abstract

The sustainable development and consumption need more efficient use of natural resources. As a consequence, the use of industrial solvents demands their recovery instead of end-of-pipe treatment. It is not always clear, however, which treatment alternative should be applied. Based on an industrial case study, the environmental and economic evaluation and comparison of the treatment alternatives of a non-ideal solvent mixture containing azeotropes is investigated for determining the preferable option. For the recovery of the industrial solvent mixture, two different separation alternatives are evaluated: a less effective alternative and a novel design based on hybrid separation tools. An end-of-pipe treatment alternative, incineration, is also considered and the split of the solvent mixtures between recovery and incineration is investigated. The environmental evaluation of the alternatives is carried out using ‘Eco-indicator 99 life-cycle impact assessment methodology’. Economic investigation is also accomplished. The economic features clearly favour the total recovery, however, the environmental evaluation detects that if a recovery process of low efficiency is applied, its environmental burden can be similar or even higher than that of the incineration. This motivates engineers to design more effective recovery processes and reconsider the evaluation of process alternatives at environmental decision making.

[1] World Commission on Environment and Development (“Brundtland Committee”): Our Common future, Oxford Univ. Press., 1987. Search in Google Scholar

[2] R.B. Bakshi and J. Fiksel: “The Quest for Sustainability: Challenges for Process Systems Engineering”, AIChE J., Vol. 47, (2003), pp. 1350–1358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.69049060210.1002/aic.690490602Search in Google Scholar

[3] T.D. Allen and R.D. Shonnard: “Green Engineering: Environmentally Conscious Design of Chemical Processes and Products”, AIChE J., Vol. 47, (2001), pp. 1906–1910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.69047090210.1002/aic.690470902Search in Google Scholar

[4] C.J. Periera: “Environmentally friendly processes”, Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 54, (1999), pp. 1959–1973. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(98)00504-110.1016/S0009-2509(98)00504-1Search in Google Scholar

[5] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Awards Program, EPA 744-K-96-001, 1996. Search in Google Scholar

[6] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Awards Program, EPA 744-S-97-001, 1997. Search in Google Scholar

[7] P. Mizsey: “Waste reduction strategy in the chemical industry”, J. Hazardous Mat., Vol. 37, (1994), pp. 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(94)85028-310.1016/0304-3894(94)85028-3Search in Google Scholar

[8] Y. Sardessai and S. Bhosle: “Tolerance of bacteria to organic solvents”, Res. Microbiol., Vol. 153, (2002), pp. 263–268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0923-2508(02)01319-010.1016/S0923-2508(02)01319-0Search in Google Scholar

[9] E.N. Pistikupoulus and S.K. Stefanis: “Optimal solvent design for environmental impact minimization”, Computers & Chem. Eng., Vol. 22, (1998), pp. 717–733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(97)00255-X10.1016/S0098-1354(97)00255-XSearch in Google Scholar

[10] S.K. Stefanis, A. Buxton, A.G. Livingston, E.N. Pistikopoulus: “A methodology for environmental impact minimization: solvent design and reaction path synthesis issues”, Comp. & Chem. Eng., Vol. 20 Suppl., (1996), pp. S1419–S1424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0098-1354(96)00243-810.1016/0098-1354(96)00243-8Search in Google Scholar

[11] M. Sinha, L.E.K. Achenie and G. Ostrovksy: “Environmentally benign solvent design by global optimization”, Comp. & Chem. Eng., Vol. 23, (1999), pp. 1381–1394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(99)00299-910.1016/S0098-1354(99)00299-9Search in Google Scholar

[12] T.B. Hofstetter, C. Capello, K. Hungerbühler: “Environmentally preferable treatment options for industrial waste solvent management — A Case Study of a Toluene Containing Waste Solvent”, Trans I. Chem. E, Vol. 81, Part B, (2003), pp. 189–202. Search in Google Scholar

[13] H. Chen and R.D. Shonnard: “Systematic Framework for Environmentally Conscious Chemical Process Design: Early and Detailed Design Stages”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 43, (2004) pp. 535–552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie030435610.1021/ie0304356Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Goedkoop and R. Spriensma: The Eco-indicator 99, a Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Assessment, Methodolgy Report, Pre Consultants, the Netherlands, 2000, www.pre.nl. Search in Google Scholar

[15] ISO 14040: Life cycle assessment-principles and framework, 1997. Search in Google Scholar

[16] H. Wenzel, M. Hauschild and L. Alting: Environmental Assessment of Products-Methodology, Tools and Case Studies in Product Development, Chapman & Hall, London, 1997. 10.1007/978-1-4615-6367-9Search in Google Scholar

[17] T. Hofstetter: Abfalösunsmittelbewirtschaftung in der chemischen Industrie, Forschungsprogramm UAW, Bundesamtes für Energie, 2002. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Sima Pro 5.1, more details at http://www.pre.nl/simapro/default.htm. Search in Google Scholar

[19] P. Mizsey, A. Raab, J. Manczinger, A. Szanyi and Z. Fonyo: Intensification of a Solvent Recovery Technology Through the Use of Hybrid Equipment, Oral lecture on ESCAPE 12, Danemark, Haag, 2002. 10.1016/S1570-7946(02)80048-7Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. Szanyi, P. Mizsey and Z. Fonyó: “Novel Hybrid Separation Process For Solvent Recovery Based on Positioning the Extractive Heterogeneous-azeotropic Distillation”, Chem. Eng. Proc., Vol. 43, (2004), pp. 327–338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0255-2701(03)00132-610.1016/S0255-2701(03)00132-6Search in Google Scholar

[21] A. Raab: Separation of a Highly Nonideal Mixture for Solvent Recovery, Thesis (Diploma), Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Chemical Engineering, Hungary, Budapest 2001. Search in Google Scholar

[22] P.T. Anastas and J.C. Warner: Green Chemistry, Theory and Praxis, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Ch. Seyler: Ein inputabhängiges Ökoinventar-Modell für die thermische Verwertung von Abfall-Lösungsmittel in der chemisch-pharmazeutischen Industrie, Thesis (PhD), Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

[24] J.M. Douglas: Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989. Search in Google Scholar

[25] “Economic indicators”, Chemical Engineering, Vol. 111, (2004), pp. 79–80. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2006-3-1
Published in Print: 2006-3-1

© 2006 Versita Warsaw

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Scroll Up Arrow