Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 1, 2010

Brain activation due to postoperative pain from the right hand measured with regional cerebral blood flow using positron emission tomography

Torsten Gordh, Bertil Vinnars, Håkan Fischer, Hans Blomberg, Jan Modig, Mats Fredrikson and Per Hartvig

Abstract

Background

Brain activation resulting from acute postoperative pain has to our knowledge not previously been studied using positron emission tomography, except from one case study. The aim of this study was to monitor activation in brain sensory pathways during acute pain after surgery of the hand. A secondary aim was to compare brain activation in clinical postoperative pain to that previously reported, by the same research group, for a model of experimental pain from the same body area. Increase in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) is presumed to indicate neuronal activation and decrease in blood flow decreased neuronal firing. An increase in blood flow in a brain region may represent stimulatory activity as well as inhibitory.

Methods

Brain activity was measured during clinical postoperative pain and a pain free state in six patients with positron emission tomography (PET) as changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF). rCBF during pain from surgery of the right thumb base was compared with a pain free state achieved by regional anaesthesia of the painful area.

Results

In postoperative pain, patients had a significantly higher CBF in the contralateral/primary and secondary somatosensory cortices as well as in the contralateral motor cortex compared to the pain free stat during local regional anaesthesia. Relatively lower rCBF during the pain state was observed in clusters in the contralateral tertiary sensory cortex, ipsilateral and contralateral secondary visual cortex, prelimbic cortex, ipsilateral prefrontal as well as anterior cingulate cortex and contralateral secondary somatosensory cortex. The increased rCBF in primary and somatosensory cortices probably correspond to pain localizing processing.

We also compared the findings in cerebral activation patterns of the postoperative pain state as described above, with the results from a previously published study by the same research group, using an experimental pain model when pain was inflicted with application of mustard oil in the same location, the thumb base region of the right hand. Since no formal statistical analysis was carried out between the two studies, the data are not very strong, but the differences reported were obvious when comparing the two situations.

The comparison gave the following outcome:

Digit activation occurred in identical sensory brain areas, i.e. primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, as compared to the changes in this study, supporting that pain localization processes use similar sensory pathways in a nociceptive acute experimental pain model, and in clinical acute postoperative nociceptive pain. Dissimilarities were observed between the models in activation of brain areas coding of the emotional pain qualities, indicating some differences between the experimental and “real” acute nociceptive pain.

Conclusion

We have reported a distinct cerebral activation pattern produced by acute postoperative pain following hand surgery. The findings were compared to data obtained in a previously published report of the cerebral activation pattern from an acute experimental pain model in volunteers. We found similarities as well as some differences in the activation pattern between the two situations.


DOI of refers to article: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2010.05.033.



Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Uppsala University Hospital, SE 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. Tel.: +46 18 611 4876; fax: +46 18 514 621 E-mail:

Acknowledgements

The financial support from the Uppsala County Counsil and the Swedish Medical Research Counsil (grants 8645 and 9077) is gratefully acknowledged. The study was done in cooperation with Uppsala Berzelii Center.

  1. Conflicts of interest: None declared.

References

[1] Andersson JL, Lilja A, Hartvig P, Långström B, Gordh Jr T, Handwerker H, Torebjörk E. Somatotopic organization along the central sulcus for pain localisation in humans as revealed by PET. Exp Brain Res 1997;117:192–9.10.1007/s002210050215Search in Google Scholar

[2] Casey KL, Minoshima S, Berger KL, Koeppe RA, Morrow TJ, Frey KA. Positron emission tomographic analysis of cerebral structures activated specifically by repetitive noxious stimuli. J Neurophysiol 1994;71:802–7.10.1152/jn.1994.71.2.802Search in Google Scholar

[3] Casey Kl, Morrow TJ, Lorenz J, Minoshima S. Temporal and spatial dynamics of human forebrain activity during heat pain: analysis by positron emission tomography. J Neurophysiol 2001;85:951–9.10.1152/jn.2001.85.2.951Search in Google Scholar

[4] Coghill RC, Talbot JD, Evans AC, Meyer E, Gjedde A, Bushnell MC, Duncan GH. Distributed processing of pain and vibration by the human brain. J Neurosci 1994;14:4095–108.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-07-04095.1994Search in Google Scholar

[5] Garcia-Larrea L, Peyron R, Mertens P, Gregoire MC, Lavenne F, Bonnefoi F, Mauguiere F, Laurent B, Sindou M. Positron emission tomography during motor cortex stimulation for pain control. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 1997;68:141–8.10.1159/000099915Search in Google Scholar

[6] Jones AKP, Brown WD, Friston KJ, Qi LY, Frackowiak RSJ. Cortical and subcortical localization of response to pain using positron emission tomography. Proc R Soc Lond B 1991;244:39–44.10.1098/rspb.1991.0048Search in Google Scholar

[7] Talbot JD, Marret S, Evans AC, Meyer E, Bushnell MC, Duncan GH. Multiple representations of pain in human cerebral cortex. Science 1991;251:1355–8.10.1126/science.2003220Search in Google Scholar

[8] Xu X, Fukuyama H, Yazawa S, Mima T, Hanakawa T, Magata Y, Kanda M, Fujiwara N, Shindo K, Nagamine T, Shibasaki H. Functional localization of pain perception in the human brain studied by PET. Neuroreport 1997;8:555–9.10.1097/00001756-199701200-00035Search in Google Scholar

[9] Hsieh JC, Ståhle-Bäckdahl M, Hägermark Ö, Stone-Elander S, Rosenquist G, Ingvar M. Traumatic nociceptive pain activates the hypothalamus and the periaqueductal gray: a positron emission tomography study. Pain 1995;64:303–14.10.1016/0304-3959(95)00129-8Search in Google Scholar

[10] Peyron R, Laurent B, Garcia-Larrea L. Functional imaging of brain response to pain—a review and meta-analysis. Neurophysiol Clin 2000;30(5):263–88.10.1016/S0987-7053(00)00227-6Search in Google Scholar

[11] deLeeuw R, Albuquergue R, Okeson J, Carlson C. The contribution of neuroimaging techniques to the understanding of supraspinal pain circuits: implications of orofacial pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005;100:308–14.10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.11.014Search in Google Scholar

[12] Hsieh JC, Belfrage M, Stone-Elander S, Hansson P, Ingvar M. Central representation of chronic ongoing neuropathic studied by positron emission tomography. Pain 1995;63:225–36.10.1016/0304-3959(95)00048-WSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Kupers RC, Svensson P, Jensen TS. Central representation of muscle pain and mechanical hyperesthesia in the oro-facial region: a positron emission tomography study. Pain 2004;108:284–93.10.1016/j.pain.2003.12.029Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kupers RC, Kehlet H. Brain imaging of clinical pain states: a critical review and strategies for further studies. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:1033–44.10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70624-XSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Holte S, Eriksson L, Dahlbom M. A preliminary evaluation of the Scanditronix PC 2048-15B brain scanner. Eur J Nucl Med 1989;15:719–21.10.1007/BF00631763Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Andersson JLR. How to estimate global flow independent of changes in local flow. NeuroImage 1997;6:237–44.10.1006/nimg.1997.0302Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Bergström M, Eriksson L, Bohm C, Blomqvist G, Litton J. Correction for scattered radiation in a ring detector positron camera by integral transformations of the projections. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1983;7:42–50.10.1097/00004728-198302000-00008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Greitz T, Bohm G, Holte S, Eriksson L. A computerized brain atlas: construction, anatomical content, and some applications. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1991;15:26–38.10.1097/00004728-199101000-00003Search in Google Scholar

[19] Andersson JLR, Thurfjell L. Implementation and validation of a fully autonomic system for intra- and interindividual registration of PET brain scans. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1997;21:136–44.10.1097/00004728-199701000-00027Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Andersson JLR. A rapid and accurate method to realign PET scans utilizing image edge information. J Nucl Med 1995;36:657–69.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Talairach J, Tournoux P. A co-planar stereotactic atlas of the human brain. Stuttgart: Thieme; 1988.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Friston KJ, Frith CD, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RSJ. Comparing functional (PET) images: the assessment of significant change. J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab 1991;11:690–9.10.1038/jcbfm.1991.122Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Worsley KJ, Poline J-B, Vandal AC, Friston KJ. Tests for distributed nonfocal brain activations. NeuroImage 1995;2:183–94.10.1006/nimg.1995.1024Search in Google Scholar

[24] Friston KJ, Worsley KJ, Frackowiak RSJ, Mazziotta JC, Evans AC. Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Hum Brain Map 1994;1:210–20.10.1002/hbm.460010306Search in Google Scholar

[25] Friston KJ, Holmes A, Poline J-B, Price CJ, Frith CD. Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power. NeuroImage 1996;40:223–35.10.1006/nimg.1996.0074Search in Google Scholar

[26] Derbyshire SWG, Jones AKP, Devani P, Friston KJ, Feinmann C, Harris M, Pearce P, Watson JDG, Frackowiak RSJ. Cerebral responses to pain in patients with atypical facial pain measured by positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57:1166–72.10.1136/jnnp.57.10.1166Search in Google Scholar

[27] Hsieh JC, Hannerz J, Ingvar M. Right lateralised central processing for pain of nitroglycerin-induced cluster headache. Pain 1996;67:59–68.10.1016/0304-3959(96)03066-7Search in Google Scholar

[28] Hsieh JC, Meyerson BA, Ingvar M. PET study on central processing of pain in trigeminal neuropathy. Eur J Pain 1999;3(1):51–65.10.1016/S1090-3801(99)90188-XSearch in Google Scholar

[29] Iadarola MJ, Max MB, Berman KF, Byas-Smith MG, Coghill RC, Gracely RH, Bennet GJ. Unilateral decrease in thalamic activity observed with positron emission tomography in patients with chronic neuropathic pain. Pain 1995;63:55–64.10.1016/0304-3959(95)00015-KSearch in Google Scholar

[30] Buvanendran A, Ali A, Stoub TR, Berger RA, Kroin JS. The use of brain positron emission tomography to identify sites of postoperative pain processing with and without epidural analgesia. Anesth Analg 2007;105:1784–6.10.1213/01.ane.0000270206.30333.cbSearch in Google Scholar

[31] Fredrikson M, Ericson K, Eriksson L, Stone-Elander, Greitz T. A functional cerebral glucose response frightening visual stimuli. Psychiatry Res 1993;50:15–24.10.1016/0925-4927(93)90020-ISearch in Google Scholar

[32] Fredrikson M, Wik G, Greitz T, Eriksson L, Stone-Elander S, Ericson K, Sedvall G. Regional cerebral blood flow during experimental phobic fear. Psychophysiology 1993;30:126–30.10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03211.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Fredrikson M, Wik G, Annas P, Ericson K, Stone-Elander S. Functional neuroanatomy of visually elicited simple phobic fear: additional data and theoretical analysis. Psychophysiology 1995;32:43–8.10.1111/j.1469-8986.1995.tb03404.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Rainville P, Duncan GH, Price DD, Carrier B, Bushnell. Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not in somatosensory cortex. Science 1997;277:968–71.10.1126/science.277.5328.968Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2009-11-04
Revised: 2010-05-26
Accepted: 2010-05-26
Published Online: 2010-07-01
Published in Print: 2010-07-01

© 2010 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain

Scroll Up Arrow