Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 1, 2011

Somatocognitive therapy in the management of chronic gynaecological pain. A review of the historical background and results of a current approach

Gro Killi Haugstad, Unni Kirste, Siv Leganger, Elin Haakonsen and Tor S. Haugstad

Abstract

Historic background and development of our somatocognitive approach

Mensendieck physiotherapy of the Oslo School is a tradition of physiotherapy founded by the American physician Bess Mensendieck, a contemporary and fellow student of Sigmund Freud at the Paris School of Neurology. It builds on the principles of functional anatomy and the theories of motor learning. We have further developed the theory and practice from this physiotherapy tradition, challenged by the enormous load of patients with longstanding, incapacitating pain on western health care systems, by seeking to incorporate inspirational ideas from body oriented dynamic psychotherapy and cognitive psychotherapy. We developed somatocognitive therapy as a hybrid of physiotherapy and cognitive psychotherapy by focusing on the present cognitive content of the mind of the patient, contrary to a focus on analysis of the subconscious and interpretation of dreams, and acknowledging the important role of the body in pain-eliciting defense mechanisms against mental stress and negative emotions.

The core of this somatocognitive therapy

(1) To promote awareness of own body, (2) graded task assignment related to the motor patterns utilized in daily activities, (3) combined with an empathic attitude built on dialogue and mutual understanding, and emotional containment and support. The goal is for the patient to develop coping strategies and mastery of own life. In addition, (4) manual release of tensed muscles and applied relaxation techniques are important.

Methods and results of an illustrative study

One area in particular need of development and research is sexual pain disorders. We have applied this somatocognitive therapy in a randomized, controlled intervention study of women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).Wesummarize methods and results of this study.

Methods

40 patients with CPP were included in a randomized, controlled intervention study. The patients were randomized into (1) a control group, receiving treatment as usual (Standard Gynecological Treatment, STGT) and (2) a group receiving STGT + Mensendieck Somatocognitive Therapy (MSCT). The patients were assessed by means of Visual Analogue Scale of Pain (VASP), Standardized Mensendieck Test (SMT) for analysis of motor patterns (posture, movement, gait, sitting posture and respiration), and General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-30) assessing psychological distress, at baseline (inclusion into study), after three months of out-patient therapy and at 1 year follow-up. Results: The women averaged 31 years, pain duration 6.1 years, average number of previous surgical procedures 1.8 per women. In the STGT group, no significant change was found, neither in pain scores, motor patterns or psychological distress during the observation period. In the group receiving STGT + MSCT, significant reduction in pain score and improvement in motor function were found at the end of therapy, and the significant improvement continued through the follow-up (64% reduction of pain scores, and 80% increase in the average score for respiration, as an example of motor pattern improvement). GHQ scores were significantly improved for anxiety and coping (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Somatocognitive therapy is anewapproach that appears to be very promising in the management of chronic gynecological pain. Short-term out-patient treatment significantly reduces pain scores and improves motor function.

Implications

Chronic pelvic pain in women is a major health care problem with no specific therapies and poor prognosis. A novel, somatocognitive approach has documented positive effects. It is now studied by other clinical researchers in order to reinforce its evidence base.


DOI of refers to article: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.05.004.



E-mail addresses:

Acknowledgements

This study was made possible thanks to generous grants from Norske Kvinners Sanitetsforening and Oslo University College, with support from Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet and Sunnaas Hospital. We are thankful for considerable contributions over some years from Professor Ulrik Malt Oslo University Hospital and Professor Per Nerdrum Oslo University College.

References

[1] Duchenne GBA. ĽElectriciation localisée. 3rd ed; 1873. pp. 486-563, Translated by GV Poore Selections from clinical work of Dr. Duchenne (De Boulogne). London: The New Sydenham Society; 1883.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Freud S. Quelques considérations pourétude comparative des paralysies motorices organiquies et hystériques. Archives de Neurolgie 1893;26:29-43.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Mensendieck BM. The Mensendieck system of functional exercises, volume I. In: Portland. Maine: The Southworth-Anthoensen Press; 1937.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Beck AT. Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press; 1976.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Fitts PM, Posner MI. Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company; 1967.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Gentile AM. A working model of skill acquistion to teaching. Quest 1972;17:3-23.10.1080/00336297.1972.10519717Search in Google Scholar

[7] Gentile AM. Implicit and explicit processes during acquisition of functional skills. Scand J Occup Ther 1998;5:7-16.10.3109/11038129809035723Search in Google Scholar

[8] Higgins S. Motor skill acquisition. Phys Ther 1991;71:123-39.10.1093/ptj/71.2.123Search in Google Scholar

[9] Carr JH, Sheperd RB. Neurological rehabilitation-optimizing motor performance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Facchini S, Muellbacher W, Battaglia F, Boroojerdi B, Halett M. Focal enhancement of motor cortex excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Acta Neurol Scand 2002;105:146-51.10.1034/j.1600-0404.2002.1o004.xSearch in Google Scholar

[11] Hodges NJ, Franks IM. Modelling coaching practice: the role of instruction and demonstration. J Sports Sci 2002;20:793-811.10.1080/026404102320675648Search in Google Scholar

[12] Flanagan JR, Vetter P, Johansson RS, Wolpert DM. Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Curr Biol 2003;13:146-50.10.1016/S0960-9822(03)00007-1Search in Google Scholar

[13] Rigault NB. Mensendieck-systemet i et didaktisk perspektiv-på jakt etter røtter. Hovedfagsoppgave. Universitetet i Oslo; 1989.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Soukup MG, Glomsrød B, Lønn JH, Bø K, Larsen S. The effect of Mensendieck exercise program as secondary prophylaxis for recurrent low back pain. A randomized, controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. Spine 1999;24:1585-91.10.1097/00007632-199908010-00013Search in Google Scholar

[15] Kendall SA, Brolin-Magnusson K, Søren B, Gerdle B, Henriksson KG. A pilot study of body awareness programs in the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Care Res 2000;13:304-7.10.1002/1529-0131(200010)13:5<304::AID-ANR10>3.0.CO;2-PSearch in Google Scholar

[16] Haugstad GK. Utvikling og validering av en standardisert, kvantifisert Mensendieck test. Anvendelse av testen ved fysioterapiundersøkelse av kroniske smertepasienter. Hovedfagsoppgave. Det medisinske fakultet. Universitetet i Oslo; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kirste UM, Haugstad GK, Leganger S, Blomhoff S, Malt UF. Chronic pelvic pain in women. Tidsskrift Nor Læegeforen 2002;122:1223-7.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Klemmetsen I. The Mensendieck system of functional movements. Oslo: Vett & Viten AS; 2005.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Wojniusz S. Association between personality traits and bodily findings. An explorative pilot study. Master thesis Institute of Nursing and Health Sciences Faculty of medicine: University of Oslo; 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Mensendieck BM. Look better, feel better. New York: Harper & Brothers; 1954.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Reich W. Character-analysis; principles and technique for psychoanalysts in practice and in training. New York: Orgone Institute Press; 1933.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Bunkan BH. The comprehensive body examination. Manual. Oslo: Norwegian University Press; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Kvaale A, Ljunggren AE, Johnsen TB. Examination of movement in patients with longlasting musculoskeletal pain: reliability and validity. Physiother Res Int 2003;8:36-52.10.1002/pri.270Search in Google Scholar

[24] Gyllensten AL, Ovesson MN, Lindstrom I, Hansson L, Ekdahl C. Reliability of body awareness scale-health. Scand J Caring Sci 2004;18:213-9.10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00272.xSearch in Google Scholar

[25] Freeman A, Greenwood V. Cognitive therapy. Applications in psychiatric and medical settings. New York: Human Sciences Press; 1987.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Halvorsen G. Mensendiecks historie. Oslo: Vett & Viten; 2009.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Winterowd C, Beck AT, Gruener D. Cognitive therapy with chronic pain patients. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2003.10.1111/j.1530-7085.2004.04008.xSearch in Google Scholar

[28] Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychother Theor Res Pract 1979;16:252-60.10.1037/h0085885Search in Google Scholar

[29] Lidbeck J. Central hyperexcitability in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a conceptual breakthrough with multiple clinical implications. Pain Res Manage 2002;7:81-92.10.1155/2002/310974Search in Google Scholar

[30] Nerdrum P, Rønnestad MH. The trainees'perspective. A qualitive study of learning empathic communication in Norway. Couns Psychol 2002;30:609-29.10.1177/00100002030004007Search in Google Scholar

[31] Hersoug AG. Quality of working alliance in psychotherapy: therapist contribution. Psychol Psychoanalyst 2002;22:18-20.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Hall AM, Ferreira H, Maher CG, Latimer J, Ferreira ML. The influence of the therapist-patient relationship on treatment outcome in physical rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther 2010;90:1099-110.10.2522/ptj.20090245Search in Google Scholar

[33] Mensendieck BM. Bewegungsprobleme. Die Gestaltung schøner Arme. München: F. Bruckman; 1927.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Andersen P. Mensendieck-systemets ledetråder i lys av nevrobiologisk kunnskap. In: Klemmetsen I, editor. Håndbok i Mensendieckgymnastikk 2. utgave. Oslo: Vett & Viten; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Fitts PM. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psych 1954;47:381-91. Reprint J Exp Psych Gen 1992; 121: 262-269.10.1037/0096-3445.121.3.262Search in Google Scholar

[36] Reinecke AM, Dattilio FM, Freeman A. Cognitive therapy with children and adolecents. New York: The Guilford; 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Öst LG. Applied relaxation: description of a coping technique and review of controlled studies. Behav Res Ther 1987;25:397-407.10.1016/0005-7967(87)90017-9Search in Google Scholar

[38] Haugstad GK. Mensendieck Somatocognitive therapy of women with gynaecological unexplained chronic pelvic pain. Doctoral Thesis. Faculty of Medicine: University of Oslo; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Staud R, Vierck CJ, Robinson ME, Price DV. Effects of the N-methyl-daspartate receptor antagonist dextromethorphan on temporal summation of pain are similar in fibromyalgia patients and normal control subjects. J Pain 2005;6:323-32.10.1016/j.jpain.2005.01.357Search in Google Scholar

[40] Meyer-Lidenberg A. Impact of prosocial neuropeptides on human brain function. Prog Brain Res 2008;170:463-70.10.1016/S0079-6123(08)00436-6Search in Google Scholar

[41] Jamieson DJ, Steege JF. The prevalence of dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia, pelvic pain and irritable bowel syndrome in primary care practices. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:332-7.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Stones RW, Mountfield J. Management of chronic pelvic pain in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1998;2:1.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Mathias SD, Kuppermann M, Liberman RF, Steege JF. Chronic pelvic pain, prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:332-7.10.1016/0029-7844(95)00458-0Search in Google Scholar

[44] Zondervan KT. The community prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women and associated illness behaviour. Br J Gen Pract 2001;51:541-7.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Haugstad GK, Haugstad TS, Kirste UM, Leganger S, Wojniusz S, Klemmetsen I, Malt UF. Posture, movement patterns, and body awareness in women with chronic pelvic pain. J Psychosom Res 2006;61:637-44.10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.05.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[46] Haugstad GK, Haugstad TS, Kirste UM, Leganger S, Hammel B, Klemmetsen I, Malt UF. Reliability and validity of a standardized Mensendieck physiotherapy test (SMT). Physiother Theory Pract 2006;22:189-205.10.1080/09593980600822834Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[47] Haugstad GK, Haugstad TS, Kirste UM, Leganger S, Hammel B, Klemmetsen I, Malt UF. Mensendieck somatocognitive therapy as treatment approach to chronic pelvic pain. Results of a randomized controlled intervention study. Am J Obst Gyn 2006;196:1303-10.10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.793Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[48] Haugstad GK, Haugstad TS, Kirste UM, Leganger S, Wojniusz S, Klemmetsen I, Malt UF. Continuing improvement of chronic pelvic pain in women after short-term Mensendieck somatocognitive therapy: results of 1-year follow-up study. Am J Obst Gyn 2008;199(615):e1-615, e8.10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[49] Beard RW, Reignald PW, Wadsworth J. Clinical features of women with chronic lower abdominal pain and pelvic congestion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95:153-61.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1988.tb06845.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[50] Fong LC, Gamble J, Sutherland IA, Beard RW.Microvascular changes in pheripheral microcirculation of women with chronic pelvic pain due to congestion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;109:867-73.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01424.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[51] Ursin H, Eriksen HR. Sensitization, subjective health complaints, and sustained arousal. Ann NY Acad Sci 2001;933:119-29.10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05819.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[52] Ursin H. Press stop to start: the role of inhibition for choice and health. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2005;30:1059-65.10.1016/j.psyneuen.2005.03.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] Banic B, Petersen-Felix S, Andersen OK, Radanov BP, Villiger PM, Arendt-Nielsen L, Curatolo M. Evidence for spinal cord hypersensitivity in chronic pain after whiplash injury and in fibromyalgia. Pain 2004;107:7-15.10.1016/j.pain.2003.05.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[54] Vlaeyen JWS, Crombez G, Goubert L. Science and psychology of pain. In: Breivik H, Shipley M, editors. Best practice and research compendium. Edinburgh: Elsevier; 2007. p. 7-16.Search in Google Scholar

[55] Apkarian AV, Bushnell MC, Treede RD, Zubieta JK. Human brain mechanisms of pain perception and regulation and disease. E J Pain 2005;9:463-84.10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.11.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[56] Phillips ML, Gregory LJ, Cullen S, Cohen S, Ng V, Andrew C. The effect of negative emotional context on neural and behavioural reponses to oesophageal stimulation. Brain 2003;126:669-84.10.1093/brain/awg065Search in Google Scholar

[57] Villemure C, Bushnell MC. Cognitive modulation of pain: how do attention and emotion influence pain processing? Pain 2002;95:195-9.10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00007-6Search in Google Scholar

[58] Kelly S, Lloyd D, Nurmikko T, Roberts N. Retrieving autobiographical memories of painful events activates cingulate cortex and inferior frontal gyrus. J Pain 2007;8:307-14.10.1016/j.jpain.2006.08.010Search in Google Scholar

[59] Moseley GL. A pain neuromatrix approach to patients with chronic pain. Man Ther 2003;8:130-40.10.1016/S1356-689X(03)00051-1Search in Google Scholar

[60] Montenegro ML, Mateues-Vasconcelos EC, Rosa E, Silva JC, Dos Reis FJ, Nogueira AA, Poli-Neto OB. Postural changes in women with chronic pelvic pain: a case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009;10:82.10.1186/1471-2474-10-82Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[61] Van Alstyne LS, Harrington KL, Haskvitz EM. Physical therapist management of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Phys Ther 2010;90:1795-806.10.2522/ptj.20090418Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2010-03-05
Revised: 2011-02-24
Accepted: 2011-02-24
Published Online: 2011-07-01
Published in Print: 2011-07-01

© 2011 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain