Abstract
Background/aims
Athletes who choose to engage in contact sports do so with the knowledge that participation will bring pain in the form of contact with others, injury, and from exertion. Whilst athletes who play contact sports have been shown to have higher pain tolerance than those who do not, it is unclear whether this is a result of habituation over time, or as a result of individual differences at the outset. The aim was to compare pain responses over an athletic season in athletes who participated in contact sport and those who disengaged from it.
Methods
One hundred and two new contact athletes completed measures of cold and ischaemic pain tolerance, perceived pain intensity, pain bothersomeness, pain coping styles and attendance at the start, middle (4 months) and end (8 months) of their season. The athletes were drawn from martial arts, rugby and American football. Cluster analysis placed 47 athletes into a participating category and 55 into a non-participating cluster.
Results
Participating athletes had higher ischaemic pain tolerance at the start (r = 0.27, p = 0.05), middle (r = 0.41, p < 0.0001) and end of the season (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001) compared to non-participating athletes. In addition participating athletes were more tolerant to cold pain at the end of the season (r = 0.39, p < 0.0001), compared to non-participating athletes. Participating athletes also exhibited higher direct coping, catastrophized less about injury pain and also found contact pain to be less bothersome physically and psychologically compared to non-participating athletes. Participating athletes were more tolerant of ischaemic pain at the end of the season compared to the start (r = 0.28, p = 0.04). Conversely nonparticipating athletes became significantly less tolerant to both pain stimuli by the end of the season (cold pressor; r = 0.54, p < 0.0001; ischaemia; r = 0.43, p = 0.006). Pain intensity as measured by a visual analogue scale did not change over the season for both groups.
Conclusions
Those who cease participation in contact sports become less pain tolerant of experimental pain, possibly a result of catastrophizing. The results suggest that athletes who commit to contact sports find pain less bothersome over time, possibly as a result of experience and learning to cope with pain. Athletes who continue to participate in contact sports have a higher pain tolerance, report less bothersomeness and have higher direct coping than those who drop out. In addition, tolerance to ischaemic pain increased over the season for participating athletes.
Implications
Having a low pain tolerance should not prevent athletes from taking part in contact sports, as pain becomes less bothersome in athletes who adhere to such activities. Participating in contact sports may result in maintained cold pain tolerance, increased ischaemic pain tolerance, reduced catastrophizing and better coping skills. Coaches can therefore work with athletes to develop pain coping strategies to aid adherence to contact sports.
Ethical issues: All participants provided informed consent to participate and the study was approved by the University Research Ethics Committee. The study was not registered.
Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Hall EG, Davies S. Gender differences in perceived intensity and affect of pain between athletes and non athletes. Percept Mot Skills 1991;73:779–86.10.2466/pms.1991.73.3.779Search in Google Scholar
[2] Sullivan MJL, Tripp DA, Rogers WM, Stanish W. Catastrophizing and pain perception in sport participants. J Appl Sport Psychol 2000;12:151–67.10.1080/10413200008404220Search in Google Scholar
[3] Tesarz J, Schuster AK, Hartmann M, Gerhardt A, Eich W. Pain perception in athletes compared to normally active controls: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Pain 2012;153:1253–62.10.1016/j.pain.2012.03.005Search in Google Scholar
[4] Ryan ED, Foster R. Athletic participation and perceptual augmentation and reduction. J Pers Soc Psychol 1967;6:472–6.10.1037/h0021226Search in Google Scholar
[5] Ryan ED, Kovacic CR. Pain tolerance and athletic participation. Percept Mot Skills 1966;22:383–90.10.2466/pms.1966.22.2.383Search in Google Scholar
[6] Raudenbush B, Canter RJ, Corley N, Grayhem R, Coon J, Lilley S, Meyer B, Wilson I. Pain threshold and tolerance differences among intercollegiate athletes: Implications of past sports injuries and willingness to compete among sports teams. N Am J Psychol 2012;14:85–91.Search in Google Scholar
[7] Tesarz J, Gerhardt A, Schommer K, Treede R, Eich W. Alterations in endogenous pain modulation in endurance athletes: an experimental study using quantitative sensory testing and the cold-pressor task. Pain 2013;154:1022–9.10.1016/j.pain.2013.03.014Search in Google Scholar
[8] Scott V, Gijsbers K. Pain perception in competitive swimmers. BMJ 1981;283:91–3.10.1136/bmj.283.6284.91Search in Google Scholar
[9] Tajet-Foxell B, Rose FD. Pain and pain tolerance in professional ballet dancers. Br J Sports Med 1995;29:31–4.10.1136/bjsm.29.1.31Search in Google Scholar
[10] Ord P, Gijsbers K. Pain thresholds and tolerances of competitive rowers and their use of spontaneous self-generated pain coping strategies. Percept Motor Skills 2003;97:1219–22.10.2466/pms.2003.97.3f.1219Search in Google Scholar
[11] Rhudy JL. Does endogenous pain inhibition make a better athlete, or does intense athletics improve endogenous pain inhibition? Pain 2013;154: 2241–2.10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.034Search in Google Scholar
[12] Geva N, Defrin R. Enhanced pain modulation among triathletes: a possible explanation for their exceptional capabilities. Pain 2013;154:2317–23.10.1016/j.pain.2013.06.031Search in Google Scholar
[13] Crombez G, Eccleston C, Baeyens F, Eelen P. Habituation and the interference of pain with task performance. Pain 1997;70:149–54.10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03304-0Search in Google Scholar
[14] Smith BW, Tooley EM, Montague EQ, Robinson AE, Cosper CJ, Mullins PG. The role of resilience and purpose in life in habituation to heat and cold pain. J Pain 2009;10:493–500.10.1016/j.jpain.2008.11.007Search in Google Scholar
[15] Dar R, Ariely D, Frenk H. The effect of past injury on pain threshold and tolerance. Pain 1995;60:189–93.10.1016/0304-3959(94)00108-QSearch in Google Scholar
[16] Sheiner E, Sheiner EK, Shoham-Vardi I. The relationship between parity and labor pain. Obstet Gynecol Int J 1998;63:287–8.10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00164-7Search in Google Scholar
[17] Saisto T, Kaaja R, Ylikorkala O, Halmesmak E. Reduced pain tolerance during and after pregnancy in women suffering from fear of labor. Pain 2001;93:123–7.10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00302-5Search in Google Scholar
[18] Byerly PN, Worrell T, Gahimer J, Domholdt E. Rehabilitation compliance in an athletic training environment. J Athl Train 1994;29:352–5.Search in Google Scholar
[19] Buckworth J, Dishman RK, O’Connor PJ, Tomporowski PD. Exercise psychology. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2013. p. 341–2.10.5040/9781492595502Search in Google Scholar
[20] Bingel U, Schoell E, Herken W, Buchel C, May A. Habituation to painful stimulation involves the antinociceptive system. Pain 2007;131:21–30.10.1016/j.pain.2006.12.005Search in Google Scholar
[21] Rennefeld C, Wiech K, Schoell ED, Lorenz J, Bingel U. Habituation to pain: further support for a central component. Pain 2009;148:503–8.10.1016/j.pain.2009.12.014Search in Google Scholar
[22] Clark-Carter D. Quantitative psychological research: a student’s handbook. Hove: Psychology Press; 2008.10.4324/9780203870709Search in Google Scholar
[23] Bourgeois AE, Meyers MC, LeUnes AD. The sport inventory for pain: empirical and confirmatory factorial validity. J Sport Behav 2009;32:19–35.Search in Google Scholar
[24] Meyers MC, Bourgeois AE, Stewart S, LeUnes A. Predicting pain response in athletes: development and assessment of the sports inventory for pain. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1992;14:249–61.10.1123/jsep.14.3.249Search in Google Scholar
[25] Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 2001;8:1153–7.10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01132.xSearch in Google Scholar
[26] Manning EL, Fillingim RB. The influence of athletic status and gender on experimental pain responses. J Pain 2002;3:421–8.10.1054/jpai.2002.128068Search in Google Scholar
[27] Bae Y, Lee S. Analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current on experimental ischemic pain models: frequencies of 50 Hz and 100 Hz. J Phys Ther Sci 2014;26:1945–8.10.1589/jpts.26.1945Search in Google Scholar
[28] Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London: Sage; 2009.Search in Google Scholar
[29] Bhalang K, Sigurdsson A, Slade GD, Maixner W. Associations among four modalities of experimental pain in women. J Pain 2005;6:604–11.10.1016/j.jpain.2005.04.006Search in Google Scholar
[30] Addison T, Kremer J, Bell R. Understanding the psychology of pain in sport. Irish J Psychol 1998;19:486–503.10.1080/03033910.1998.10558209Search in Google Scholar
[31] Rainville P, Feine JS, Bushnell C, Duncan GH. A psychophysical comparison of sensory and affective responses to four modalities of experimental pain. Somatosens Mot Res 1992;9:265–77.10.3109/08990229209144776Search in Google Scholar
[32] Janal MN, Glusman M, Kuhl JP, Clark WC. On the absence of correlation between noxious heat, cold, electrical and ischemic stimulation. Pain 1994;58:403–11.10.1016/0304-3959(94)90135-XSearch in Google Scholar
[33] Jaremko ME, Silbert L, Mann T. The differential ability of athletes and non-athletes to cope with two types of pain: a radical behavioural model. Psychol Rec 1981;31:265–75.10.1007/BF03394739Search in Google Scholar
[34] Bandura A, O’Leary A, Barr Taylor C, Gauthier J, Gossard D. Perceived self-efficacy and pain control: opioid and nonopioid mechanisms. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987;53:563–71.10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.563Search in Google Scholar
[35] Gedney JJ, Logan H. Pain related recall predicts future pain report. Pain 2006;121:69–76.10.1016/j.pain.2005.12.005Search in Google Scholar
[36] Lee JE, Watson D, Frey Law LA. Lower order pain-related constructs are more predictive of cold pressor pain ratings than higher-order personality traits. J Pain 2010;7:681–91.10.1016/j.jpain.2009.10.013Search in Google Scholar
[37] Taylor J, Taylor S. Pain education and management in the rehabilitation from sports injury. Sport Psychol 1998;12:68–88.10.1123/tsp.12.1.68Search in Google Scholar
[38] Maeoka H, Hiyamizu M, Matsuo A, Morioka S. The influence of repeated pain stimulation on the emotional aspect of pain: a preliminary study in healthy volunteers. J Pain Res 2015;8:431–6.10.2147/JPR.S86732Search in Google Scholar
[39] Pen LJ, Fisher CA. Athletes and pain tolerance. Sports Med 1994;18:319–29.10.2165/00007256-199418050-00004Search in Google Scholar
[40] DeRoche T, Woodman T, Yannick S, Brewer BW, Le Scanff C. Athletes’ inclination to play through pain: a coping perspective. Anxiety Stress Coping 2011;24:579–87.10.1080/10615806.2011.552717Search in Google Scholar
[41] Kress JL, Statler T. A naturalistic investigation of former Olympic cyclists’ cognitive strategies for coping with exertion pain during performance. J Sport Behav 2007;30:428–52.Search in Google Scholar
[42] Johnson MH, Stewart J, Humphries SA, Chamove AS. Marathon runners’ reaction to potassium iontophoretic experimental pain: pain tolerance, pain threshold, coping and self-efficacy. Eur J Pain 2011;16:767–74.10.1002/j.1532-2149.2011.00059.xSearch in Google Scholar
[43] Driediger M, Hall C, Callow N. Imagery use by injured athletes: a qualitative analysis. J Sports Sci 2006;24:261–71.10.1080/02640410500128221Search in Google Scholar
[44] Baker SL, Kirsch I. Cognitive mediators of pain perception and tolerance. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991;61:504–10.10.1037/0022-3514.61.3.504Search in Google Scholar
[45] Egan S. Acute-pain tolerance among athletes. Can J Sport Sci 1987;12:175–8.Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain