Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton December 4, 2015

Voice Register in Mon: Acoustics and Electroglottography

Arthur S. Abramson, Mark K. Tiede and Theraphan Luangthongkum
From the journal Phonetica

Abstract

Mon is spoken in villages in Thailand and Myanmar. The dialect of Ban Nakhonchum, Thailand, has 2 voice registers, modal and breathy; these phonation types, along with other phonetic properties, distinguish minimal pairs. Four native speakers of this dialect recorded repetitions of 14 randomized words (7 minimal pairs) for acoustic analysis. We used a subset of these pairs in a listening test to verify the perceptual robustness of the register distinction. Acoustic analysis found significant differences in noise component, spectral slope and fundamental frequency. In a subsequent session 4 speakers were also recorded using electroglottography, which showed systematic differences in the contact quotient. The salience of these properties in maintaining the register distinction is discussed in the context of possible tonogenesis for this language.


*Dr. Arthur S. Abramson, Haskins Laboratories, 300 George Street, Suite 900, New Haven, CT 06511 (USA), E-Mail arthur.abramson@uconn.edu

References

1 Abramson AS, L-Thongkum T, Nye PW (2004): Voi ce register in Suai (Kuai): an analysis of perceptual and acoustic data. Phonetica 61:147-171.10.1159/00008256115662109 Search in Google Scholar

2 Abramson AS, Nye PW, Luangthongkum T (2007): Voice register in Khmu': experiments in production and perception. Phonetica 64:80-104.10.1159/00010791117914278 Search in Google Scholar

3 Abramson AS, Luangthongkum T (2009): A fuzzy boundary between tone languages and voice-register languages; in Fant G, Fujisaki H, Shen J (eds): Frontiers in Phonetics and Speech Science. Beijing, Commercial Press, pp 149-155. Search in Google Scholar

4 Blagden CO (1910): Quelques notions sur la phonétique du Talian et son évolution historique. J Asiat Dix Sér 15:477-505. Search in Google Scholar

5 Bradlow AR, Torretta GM, Pisoni DB (1996): Intelligibility of normal speech. I. Global and fine-grained acousticphonetic talker characteristics. Speech Commun 20:255-272.10.1016/S0167-6393(96)00063-521461127 Search in Google Scholar

6 Brunelle B (2005): Register and tone in Eastern Cham: evidence from a word game. Mon-Khmer Stud 35:121-132. Search in Google Scholar

7 Brunelle B (2012): Dialect experience and perceptual integrality in phonological registers: fundamental frequency, voice quality and the first formant in Cham. J Acoust Soc Am 131:3088-3102.10.1121/1.369365122501082 Search in Google Scholar

8 De Krom G (1993): A ceptrum-based technique for determining a harmonics-to-noise ratio in speech signals. J Speech Hear Res 36:254-265.10.1044/jshr.3602.2548487518 Search in Google Scholar

9 DiCanio CT (2009): The phonetics of register in Takhian Thong Chong. J Int Phonet Assoc 39:162-188.10.1017/S0025100309003879 Search in Google Scholar

10 Diffloth G (1982): Registres, dévoisement, timbres vocaliques: leur histoire en Katouique. Mon-Khmer Stud 11:1-33. Search in Google Scholar

11 Edmondson JA (2009): Voice qualities and inverse filtering in Chong. Mon-Khmer Stud 26:107-116. Search in Google Scholar

12 Edmondson JA, Esling JH (2006): The valves of the throat and their functioning in tone, vocal register, and stress: laryngoscopic case studies. Phonology 23:157-191.10.1017/S095267570600087X Search in Google Scholar

13 Ferlus M (1980): Formation des registres et mutations consonantiques dans les langues Mon-Khmer. Mon-Khmer Stud 8:1-76. Search in Google Scholar

14 Fischer-Jørgensen E (1967): Phonetic analysis of breathy (murmured) vowels in Gujarati. Indian Linguist 28:71-139. Search in Google Scholar

15 Forster KL, Forster JC (2003): DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behav Res Methods Instr Comput 35:116-124 (www.web.arizona.edu/∼cul/dmdx.htm).10.3758/BF0319550312723786 Search in Google Scholar

16 Gårding E, Lindell K (1977): Tones in Northern Kammu: a phonetic investigation. Acta Orientalia 38:321-332. Search in Google Scholar

17 Gordon M, Ladefoged P (2001): Phonation types: a cross-linguistic overview. J Phonet 29:383- 406.10.1006/jpho.2001.0147 Search in Google Scholar

18 Gregerson K, Smith K (1973): The development of To'drah register. Mon-Khmer Stud 4:143-184. Search in Google Scholar

19 Halliday R (1922): A Mon-English Dictionary. Bangkok, Siam Society. Search in Google Scholar

20 Hanson H (1997). Glottal characteristics of female speakers: acoustic correlates. J Acoust Soc Am 101:466-481.10.1121/1.4179919000737 Search in Google Scholar

21 Haudricourt A-G (1954): De l'origine des tons en vietnamien. J Asiat 242:69-82. Search in Google Scholar

22 Heinreich N, d'Alessandro, C, Doval B; Castellengo M (2004): On the use of the derivative of electroglottographic signals for characterization of nonpathological phonation. J Acoust Soc Am 115:1321-1332.10.1121/1.164640115058354 Search in Google Scholar

23 Henderson EJA (1952): The main features of Cambodian pronunciation. Bull School Orient Stud 17:149-174.10.1017/S0041977X00084251 Search in Google Scholar

24 Henderson EJA (1965): The topography of certain phonetic and morphological characteristics of South East Asian languages. Lingua 15:400-434.10.1016/0024-3841(65)90020-3 Search in Google Scholar

25 Hillenbrand J, Cleveland RA, Erickson RL (1994): Acoustic correlates of breathy voice quality. J Speech Hear Res 31:769-778.10.1044/jshr.3704.7697967562 Search in Google Scholar

26 Hollien H (1974): On vocal registers. J Phonet 2:125-143. Search in Google Scholar

27 Huffman FE (1976): The register problem in fifteen Mon-Khmer languages; in Jenner PN, Thompson LC, Starosta S (eds): Austroasiatic Studies. Special Publication No 13. Honolulu, University of Hawaii, Oceanic Linguistics, vol 1, pp 575-589. Search in Google Scholar

28 Huffman MK (1987): Measures of phonation in Hmong. J Acoust Soc Am 81:495-504.10.1121/1.3949153558967 Search in Google Scholar

29 Iseli M, Shue Y-L, Alwan A (2007): Age, sex, and vowel dependencies of acoustic measures related to the voice source. J Acoust Soc Am 121:2283-2295.10.1121/1.269752217471742 Search in Google Scholar

30 Kawahari H, de Cheveigné A, Patterson RD (1998): An instantaneous-frequency-based pitch extraction method for high quality speech transformation: revised TEMPO in the STRAIGHT-suite. Proc ICSLP'98, Sydney, December 1998. Search in Google Scholar

31 Keating P, Esposito C, Garelick M, Khan S, Kuang J (2010): Phonation contrasts across languages. UCLA Work Papers Phonet 108:188-202. Search in Google Scholar

32 Kreiman J, Sidtis D (2011): Foundations of Voice Studies. Chichester, Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444395068 Search in Google Scholar

33 Ladefoged P, Maddieson I, Jackson M (1988): Investigating phonation types in different languages; in Fujimura H (ed): Vocal Physiology: Voice Production, Mechanisms and Functions. New York, Raven Press, vol 2, pp 297-317. Search in Google Scholar

34 Lane H, Matthies M, Perkell J, Vick J, Zandipour M (2001): The effects of changes in hearing status in cochlear implant users on the acoustic vowel space and CV coarticulation. J Speech Lang Hear Res 44:552-563.10.1044/1092-4388(2001/043)11407560 Search in Google Scholar

35 Laver J (1980): The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/S0025100300002292 Search in Google Scholar

36 Lee T (1983): An acoustic study of the register distinction in Mon. UCLA Work Papers Phonet 57:79-96. Search in Google Scholar

37 Lofqvist A, Baer T, McGarr NS, Seider Story R (1989): The cricothyroid muscle in voicing control. J Acoust Soc Am 85:1314-1321.10.1121/1.3974622708673 Search in Google Scholar

38 Matisoff JA (1973): Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia; in Hyman L (ed): Consonant Types and Tone. Southern Calif Occas Papers in Linguistics, No 1. Los Angeles, Linguistics Program, USC, pp 71-95. Search in Google Scholar

39 Mooshammer C (2010): Acoustic and laryngographic measures of the laryngeal reflexes of linguistic prominence and vocal effort in German. J Acoust Soc Am 127:1047-1058.10.1121/1.327716020136226 Search in Google Scholar

40 Murry T (1982): Phonation assessment; in Lass NJ, McReynolds LV, Northern JL, Yoder DE (eds): Speech, Language, and Hearing. Philadelphia, Saunders, vol 2: Pathologies of speech and language, pp 477-488 . Search in Google Scholar

41 Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000): Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York, Springer.10.1007/b98882 Search in Google Scholar

42 R Core Team (2014): R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/. Search in Google Scholar

43 Sjölander K (2004): Snack sound toolkit. KTH Stockholm, Sweden. http://www.speech.kth.se/snack/. Search in Google Scholar

44 Shue Y-L, Keating P, Vicenik C (2009): VoiceSauce: a program for speech analysis (abstract). J Acoust Soc Am 126:2221.10.1121/1.3248865 Search in Google Scholar

45 Stevens KN (1998): Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

46 Stevens KN, Keyser SJ (2010): Quantal theory, enhancement and overlap. J Phonet 38:10-19.10.1016/j.wocn.2008.10.004 Search in Google Scholar

47 Svantesson J-O, House D (2006): Tone production, tone perception and Kammu tonogenesis. Phonology 23:309-333.10.1017/S0952675706000923 Search in Google Scholar

48 Syrdal AK, Gopal HS (1986): A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on auditory representation of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 79:1086-1100.10.1121/1.3933813700864 Search in Google Scholar

49 Tehrani H (2009): EGGWorks: a program for automated analysis of EGG signals. http://www.linguistics.ucla.edu/faciliti/facilities/physiology/EggWorksSetup.exe. Search in Google Scholar

50 Thongkum TL4 (1987): Another look at the register distinction in Mon. UCLA Work Papers Phonet 67:132-165. Search in Google Scholar

51 Thongkum TL (1988): Phonation types in Mon-Khmer languages; in Fujimura H (ed): Vocal Fold Physiology: Voice Productions, Mechanisms and Functions. New York, Raven Press, vol 2, pp 319-333. Search in Google Scholar

52 Thongkum TL (1989): An acoustical study of the register complex in Kui (Suai). Mon-Khmer Stud 15:1-19. Search in Google Scholar

53 Thongkum TL (1990): The interaction between pitch and phonation type in Mon: implications for a theory of tonogenesis. Mon-Khmer Stud 16-17:11-24. Search in Google Scholar

54 Thongkum TL (1991): An instrumental study of Chong registers; in Davidson JHCS (ed): Austroasiatic Languages: Essays in Honor of H.L. Shorto. London, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, pp 141-160. Search in Google Scholar

55 Thurgood G (2007): Tonogenesis revisited: reviving the model and the analysis; in Harris JG, Somsonge B, Harris JE (eds): Studies in Tai and Southeast Asian Linguistics. Bangkok, Ekphim Thai, pp 241-262. Search in Google Scholar

56 Traill A (1985): Phonetic and phonological studies of !Xóõ Bushman. Vol. 1. Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company. Search in Google Scholar

57 Watkins J (1997): Can phonation types be reliably measured from sound spectra? Some data from Wa and Burmese. SOAS Work Papers Linguist Phonet 7:321-339. Search in Google Scholar

58 Watkins J (2001): Burmese. J IPA 31:291-295. Search in Google Scholar

59 Wayland R, Jongman A (2003): Acoustic correlates of breathy and clear vowels: the case of Khmer. J Phonet 31:181-201.10.1016/S0095-4470(02)00086-4 Search in Google Scholar

60 Weinreich U (1953): Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York, No 1. New York, Linguistic Circle of New York.10.2307/410136 Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-07-11
Accepted: 2015-10-14
Published Online: 2015-12-04
Published in Print: 2016-02-01

© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel