Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton April 7, 2017

Perception of Japanese Pitch Accent without F0

Yukiko Sugiyama ORCID logo
From the journal Phonetica

Abstract

Phonological contrasts are typically encoded with multiple acoustic correlates to ensure efficient communication. Studies have shown that such phonetic redundancy is found not only in segmental contrasts, but also in suprasegmental contrasts such as tone. In Japanese, fundamental frequency (F0) is the primary cue for pitch accent. However, little is known about its secondary cues. In the present study, a perception experiment was conducted to examine whether any secondary cues exist for Japanese accent. First, minimal pairs of final-accented and unaccented words were identified using a database, resulting in 14 pairs of words. These words were then produced by a native Tokyo Japanese speaker, and presented to participants in both unedited and edited forms. Edited speech stimuli were created by replacing F0 in the natural speech stimuli with white noise. While word identification by Tokyo Japanese speakers had higher accuracy for natural speech than for edited speech, the accuracy exceeded the chance level for edited speech, suggesting the existence of secondary cues for Japanese accent. Acoustic analysis of the stimuli revealed that relative mean amplitude and relative maximum amplitude were greater for final-accented words than for unaccented words.


verified



*Yukiko Sugiyama, 4-1-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8521 (Japan), E-Mail yukiko@keio.jp

References

1 Abramson AS (1972): Tonal experiments with whispered Thai. Pap Linguist Phon Mem Pierre Delattre 54:31-44.10.1515/9783110803877-004Search in Google Scholar

2 Amano S, Kondo T (1999): Nihongo no goitokusei. Tokyo, Sanseido.Search in Google Scholar

3 Amano S, Kondo T, Kato K (1999): Familiarity effect on spoken word recognition in Japanese. Proc 14th ICPhS, San Francisco, vol 2, pp 873-876.Search in Google Scholar

4 Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014): lme4: linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4. R package version 1.1-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.Search in Google Scholar

5 Beckman ME (1986): Stress and Non-Stress Accent. Dordrecht, Foris.10.1515/9783110874020Search in Google Scholar

6 Bias (2009): Peak. Computer program, version 6 (LE). http://www.bias-inc.com.Search in Google Scholar

7 Boersma P, Weenink D (2011): Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Computer program. http://www.praat.org.Search in Google Scholar

8 Cedrus (2009): SuperLab. Computer program. http://www.superlab.com.Search in Google Scholar

9 Culter A, Otake T (1999): Pitch-accent in spoken word recognition in Japanese. J Acoust Soc Am 105:1877-1888.10.1121/1.426724Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10 Fry DB (1955): Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. J Acoust Soc Am 27:765-768.10.1121/1.1908022Search in Google Scholar

11 Fu Q-J, Zeng F-G (2000): Identification of temporal envelope cues in Chinese tone recognition. Asia Pacific J Speech Lang Hear 5:45-57.10.1179/136132800807547582Search in Google Scholar

12 Higashikawa M, Nakai K, Sakakura A, Takahashi H (1996): Perceived pitch of whispered vowels - relationship with formant frequencies: a preliminary study. J Voice 10:155-158.10.1016/S0892-1997(96)80042-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13 Inoue F (1998): Nihongo Uocchingu (in Japanese). Tokyo, Iwanami.Search in Google Scholar

14 Kaiki N, Takeda K, Sagisaka Y (1992): Vowel duration control using linguistic information. J IEICE J75-A:467-473.Search in Google Scholar

15 Kallail K, Emanuel F (1984): Formant-frequency differences between isolated whispered and phonated vowel samples produced by adult female subjects. J Speech Hear Res 27:245-251.10.1044/jshr.2702.251Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16 Kingston J, Diehl RL (1994): Phonetic knowledge. Language 70:419-454.10.2307/416481Search in Google Scholar

17 Kitahara M (2001): Category Structure and Function of Pitch Accent in Tokyo Japanese; PhD dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.Search in Google Scholar

18 Kloster Jensen M (1958): Recognition of word tones in whispered speech. Word 14:187-196.10.1080/00437956.1958.11659663Search in Google Scholar

19 Kluender KR, Lotto AJ (1999): Virtues and perils of an empiricist approach to speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am 105:503-511.10.1121/1.424587Search in Google Scholar

20 Kochanski G, Grabe E, Coleman J, Rosner B (2005): Loudness predicts prominence: fundamental frequency lends little. J Acoust Soc Am 118:1038-1054.10.1121/1.1923349Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21 Kubozono H (1993): The Organization of Japanese Prosody. Tokyo, Kuroshio.Search in Google Scholar

22 Lehiste I (1970): Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

23 Liu S, Samuel AG (2004): Perception of Mandarin lexical tones when F0 information is neutralized. Lang Speech 47:109-138.10.1177/00238309040470020101Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24 Meyer-Eppler W (1957): Realization of prosodic features in whispered speech. J Acoust Soc Am 29:104-106.10.1121/1.1905013Search in Google Scholar

25 Macmillan NA, Creelman CD (2004): Detection Theory: A User's Guide, ed 2. Cambridge, Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410611147Search in Google Scholar

26 Miller JD (1961): Word tone recognition in Vietnamese whispered speech. Word 17:11-15.10.1080/00437956.1961.11659743Search in Google Scholar

27 Nearey TM (1997): Speech perception as pattern recognition. J Acoust Soc Am 101:3241-3254.10.1121/1.418290Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28 Neustupný JV (1978): Post-Structural Approaches to Language: Language Theory in a Japanese Context. Tokyo, University of Tokyo Press.Search in Google Scholar

29 R Core Team (2014): R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/.Search in Google Scholar

30 Stevens KN, Keyser SJ, Kawasaki H (1986): Toward a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant features; in Perkell JS, Klatt DH (eds): Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes. Hillsdale, Erlbaum, pp 426-449.10.2307/1422414Search in Google Scholar

31 Stevens KN, Klatt DH (1974): Role of formant transitions in the voiced-voiceless distinction for stops. J Acoust Soc Am 55:653-659.10.1121/1.1914578Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32 Sugito M (1982): Tookyoo akusento ni okeru “hana” to “hana” no seisei to chikaku; in Sugito M (ed): Nihongo akusento no kenkyuu (in Japanese). Tokyo, Sanseido, pp 182-201.Search in Google Scholar

33 Sugito M, Higashikawa M, Sakakura A, Takahashi H (1991): Perceptual, acoustical, and physiological study of Japanese word accent in whispered speech. IEICE Tech Rep 91:1-8.Search in Google Scholar

34 Sugiyama Y (2008): The Nature of Japanese Pitch Accent: An experimental study; PhD dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.Search in Google Scholar

35 Sugiyama Y (2014): Formant frequencies as a possible correlate of Japanese accent. Reports of the Keio Institute of Cultural and Linguistic Studies, pp 41-55.Search in Google Scholar

36 Tanaka S, Kubozono H (1999): Nihongo no hatsuon kyooshitsu (in Japanese). Tokyo, Kuroshio Shuppan.Search in Google Scholar

37 Tanaka Y (2010): Shutoken ni okeru gengodootai no kenkyuu (in Japanese). Tokyo, Kasamashoin.Search in Google Scholar

38 Thomas IB (1969): Perceived pitch of whispered vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 46: 468-470.10.1121/1.1911712Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39 Vance TJ (1995): Final accent vs no accent: utterance-final neutralization in Tokyo Japanese. J Phon 23:487-499.10.1006/jpho.1995.0035Search in Google Scholar

40 Weitzman RS (1970): Word Accent in Japanese. Detroit, Management Information Services.Search in Google Scholar

41 Whalen DH, Xu Y (1992): Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments. Phonetica 49:25-47.10.1159/000261901Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42 Wright R (1997): Lexical Competition and Reduction in Speech: A Preliminary Report (Progress Report No 21). Bloomington, Speech Research Laboratory.Search in Google Scholar

43 Zee E (1980): Tone and vowel quality. J Phon 8:247-258.10.1121/1.2016211Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-03-10
Accepted: 2016-10-30
Published Online: 2017-04-07
Published in Print: 2017-05-01

© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel

Downloaded on 1.12.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1159/000453069/html
Scroll Up Arrow