Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 31, 2012

Political Beliefs and Tort Awards: Evidence of Rationally Political Jurors from Two Data Sets

Scott Wentland
From the journal Review of Law & Economics

Abstract

To better understand jury decision-making, this paper explores the extent to which jurors’ political beliefs impact real world trial outcomes. The key finding of this study is a strong empirical link between a jury pool’s political leanings and tort awards, robust across two distinct data sets, namely pooled panels from the Civil Justice Survey of State Courts and Jury Verdict Research data. I find that a one standard deviation (12%) increase in a jury pool’s Democratic vote (in presidential elections) increases tort awards by approximately $157,600 (or 30%) on average. This general relationship remains consistent through county and time fixed effects estimations, and controlling for a number of socioeconomic demographics. While the empirics presented here do not establish a definitive causal link, the data lends evidence to the case for what I call a “rationally political juror,” suggesting further examination into juror incentives and decision-making.

Published Online: 2012-12-31

©2012 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston