Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter 2017

Social Constitutivism and the Role of Retorsive Arguments

From the book Transcendental Arguments in Moral Theory

  • Micha H. Werner


This paper argues that certain transcendental arguments can play a valuable role in moral reasoning: They can make explicit constitutive elements of our common practice of justifying our actions to one another, of addressing practical criticism, of deliberating together, or of constructing a sharable standpoint of practical judgment. Thereby, they can serve to reaffirm basic normative commitments that no one who makes practical claims or who complains against another person’s conduct can avoid making. This amounts to a more modest interpretation of the potential of transcendental arguments than can be usually found in more traditional (“first personal”) versions of Kantian constitutivism. However, the modest use of transcendental reasoning may suffice for all practical purposes, even though it is not designed to force a moral sceptic into endorsing moral principles.

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Munich/Boston
Downloaded on 6.6.2023 from
Scroll to top button