Abstract
The diagnostic value of Brucella IgM/IgG flow assays was evaluated in comparison with serum agglutination and 2-mercaptoethanol tests by testing a selection of serum samples submitted to the laboratory because of clinical suspicion of brucellosis. All 39 admission and 11 follow-up samples that agglutinated in the serum agglutination test tested positive in the flow assay, whereas all 20 serum agglutination negative samples with clinical suspicion of brucellosis, 23 control samples from healthy individuals and 20 control samples from cases with chronic hepatitis tested negative in the flow assay. The Brucella IgM and IgG flow assays were slightly more sensitive than the agglutination tests in discriminating between specific IgM and IgG antibodies. The Brucella IgM and IgG flow assays are easy-to-perform and quick assays that can be used for the diagnosis of brucellosis. The flow assays are very useful, especially in rural settings where brucellosis is widespread and where well-equipped laboratories to perform the laboratory tests are not readily available.
References
1. Young EJ. Brucella species. In: Mandell GI, Douglas R, Bennett J, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1995:2053–60.Search in Google Scholar
2. Cetin ET, Coral B, Bilgic A, Bilgehan H, Sipahioglu U, Gurel M, et al. Determination of brucellosis incidence in Turkey. Turk J Med Sci 1990; 14:324–34.Search in Google Scholar
3. Colak H, Usluer G, Karaguven B, Kose S, Ozgunes I. Seroepidemiologic screening for brucellosis in rural areas. Turk J Infect 1991; 5:83–6.Search in Google Scholar
4. Celebi S, Babacan M, Tuncel E, Ayyıldız A. The inapparant brucellosis in the Erzurum region, East Turkey. Turk J Infect 1991; 5:175–6.Search in Google Scholar
5. Shapiro DS, Wong JD. Brucella. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolkan RH, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 1999:625–31.Search in Google Scholar
6. Kerr WR, Mccaughy WJ, Coghlan JD, Payne DJ, Quaife RA, Robertson L, et al. Techniques and interpretation in serodiagnosis of brucellosis in man. J Med Microbiol 1968; 1;181–93.10.1099/00222615-1-2-181Search in Google Scholar
7. Buchanan TM, Sulzer CR, Frix MK, Feldman RA. Brucellosis in the United States, 1960–1972: an abattoir-associated disease. II. Diagnostic aspects. Medicine 1974; 53:415–26.10.1097/00005792-197411000-00002Search in Google Scholar
8. Smits HL, Basahi MA, Diaz R, Maradon T, Douglas JT, Rocha A, et al. Development and evaluation of a rapid dipstick assay for serodiagnosis of acute human brucellosis. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37:4179–82.10.1128/JCM.37.12.4179-4182.1999Search in Google Scholar
9. Altuglu I, Zeytinoglu A, Bilgic A, Kamcioglu S, Karakartal G, Smits HL. Evaluation of Brucella dipstick assay for the diagnosis of acute brucellosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2002; 44:241–3.10.1016/S0732-8893(02)00456-XSearch in Google Scholar
10. Smits HL, Abdoel TH, Solera J, Clavijo E, Diaz R. Immunochromatographic Brucella-specific immunoglobulin M and G lateral flow assay for rapid serodiagnosis of human. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003; 10:1141–6.10.1128/CDLI.10.6.1141-1146.2003Search in Google Scholar
11. Irmak H, Buzgan T, Evirgen O, Akdeniz H, Demiroz AP, Abdoel TH, et al. Use of a new, simple and rapid diagnostic test, the Brucella IgM and IgG flow assays in the serodiagnosis of human brucellosis in an endemic area in eastern Turkey. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2004; 70:688–94.10.4269/ajtmh.2004.70.688Search in Google Scholar
12. Mert A, Ozaras R, Tabak F, Bilir M, Yılmaz M, Kurt C, et al. The sensitivity and the specificity of Brucella agglutination tests. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003; 46:241–3.10.1016/S0732-8893(03)00081-6Search in Google Scholar
13. Durmaz R, Durmaz B, Rafiq M, Sönmez E. Seropositivity of brucellosis in Malatya, Turkey. Turk J Med Sci 1997; 27:125–8.Search in Google Scholar
14. Marodan E, Nenova-Poliakova R, Rubio M, Ariza J, Clavijo E, Smits HL, et al. Evaluation of three serological methods to measure Brucella IgM antibodies and interference of IgA in the interpretation of mercaptan-based tests. J Med Microbiol 2001; 50:663–6.10.1099/0022-1317-50-8-663Search in Google Scholar
15. Aydın N, Minbay A, Izgur M, Yardımcı H. Brucellosis in sheep and goats (in relation to epidemiology and human infection). In: Tumbay E, Hilmi S, Ang O, editors. Brucella and brucellosis in man and animals. İzmir: Ege University Press, 1996:51–65.Search in Google Scholar
©2006 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York