Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 18, 2006

On the relationship between fibre length, cellulose chain length and pulp viscosity of a softwood sulfite pulp

Luc Lapierre, Jean Bouchard and Richard Berry
From the journal

Abstract

Many chemical pulp mills use pulp viscosity as an indicator of pulp strength, and some mill customers stipulate a particular viscosity threshold for the delivered product. Nevertheless, the value of the viscosity-strength relationship is often questioned, particularly as it varies with the wood species and the pulping process. To provide some insight, the viscosity, degree of polymerisation and fibre length were measured for a bleached softwood sulfite pulp segregated into different fractions with respect to fibre length using a Bauer-McNett fractionator. It was demonstrated that fractions with a longer average fibre length also had a higher degree of polymerisation and higher viscosity. The cellulose chain length in chemical pulps is approximately three orders of magnitude shorter than the fibre length, and thus a relationship between these two properties should not be expected. The possible causes of the correlation between fibre length and viscosity are discussed. In this work, viscosity appears to be an indirect measurement of the average fibre length of a pulp, which would be the direct contributor to the strength of that pulp.

:

Corresponding author. Pulp and Paper Research Institute of Canada (PAPRICAN), 570 Boul. St-Jean, Pointe-Claire, Québec, Canada H9R 3J9

References

Ander, P., Daniel, G., Garcia-Lindgren, C., Marklund, A. (2005) Characterization of industrial and laboratory pulp fibres using HCl, cellulase and FiberMaster analysis. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J.20:115–120.10.3183/npprj-2005-20-01-p115-121Search in Google Scholar

Broderick, G., Paris, J., Valade, J.L., Wood, J. (1996) Linking the fiber characteristics and handsheet properties of a high-yield pulp. Tappi J.79(1):161–169.Search in Google Scholar

Carvalho, M., Martins, A., Figueiredo, M. (1997) [Fractionation of eucalyptus kraft pulp: Physicochemical characterization and papermaking performance]. Papel7(72):83–86.Search in Google Scholar

Clark, J.d.A. Pulp Technology and Treatment of Paper. Miller Freeman Publications, San Francisco, 1985.Search in Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, J.M. (1965) The relationship between fiber morphology and paper properties: a review of literature. Tappi J.48(8):440–447.Search in Google Scholar

Dinwoodie, J.M. (1966) The influence of anatomical and chemical characteristics of softwood fibers on the properties of sulphate pulp. Tappi J.49(2):57.Search in Google Scholar

Evans, R., Wearne, R.H., Wallis, A.F.A. (1989) Molecular weight distribution of cellulose as its tricarbanilate by high performance size exclusion chromatography. J. Appl. Polym. Sci.37:3291–3303.10.1002/app.1989.070371202Search in Google Scholar

Forgacs, O.L. (1961) Structural weaknesses in softwood pulp tracheids. Tappi J.44(2):112.Search in Google Scholar

Gooding, R., Olson, J. (2001) Fractionation in a Bauer-McNett classifier. J. Pulp Pap. Sci.27:423–428.Search in Google Scholar

Gurnagul, N., Page, D.H., Paice, M.G. (1992) The effect of cellulose degradation on the strength of wood pulp fibres. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J.3:152–154.10.3183/npprj-1992-07-03-p152-154Search in Google Scholar

Iribarne, J., Schroeder, L.R. (2000) Homogeneity of kraft pulps. In: Proceedings of the Tappi Pulping/Process and Product Quality Conference, Nov. 5–8, 2000. Tappi Press, Atlanta, pp. 835–850.Search in Google Scholar

Jayme, G., Chehata, A., Roffael, E. (1972) Relationships between fiber length of pulp fractions and their crystallinity index, WRV, and intrinsic viscosity values. Papier26(3):111–115.Search in Google Scholar

Karnis, A. (1997) Pulp fractionation by fibre characteristics. Pap. Puu79:480–488.Search in Google Scholar

Kubes, G., Fleming, B.I. (1982) Viscosities of unbleached pulps. III. Wood species. J. Wood Chem. Technol.4:459–464.Search in Google Scholar

Kull, L.G.A. (1963) The difference between sulfate and sulfite pulps. Tappi J.46(11):198A.Search in Google Scholar

Mohlin, U.-B., Molin, U., De Puiseau, M.W. (2003) Some aspects of using zero-span tensile index as a measure of fiber strength. Paper presented at the International Paper Physics Conference, Victoria, BC.Search in Google Scholar

Page, D.H. (1969) A theory for the tensile strength of paper. Tappi J.52:674–681.Search in Google Scholar

PAPTAC Standard (2000) G24P. Cupriethylenediamine viscosity of pulp.Search in Google Scholar

Rydholm, S.A. (1965) Pulping Processes, Interscience Publishers, New York, pp.1160.Search in Google Scholar

Schroeder, L.R., Haigh, F.C. (1979) Cellulose and wood pulp polysaccharides: Gel permeation chromatographic analysis. Tappi62(10):103–105.Search in Google Scholar

Seth, R.S., Page, D.H. (1987) Fibre properties and tearing resistance. Tappi J.71(2):103–107.Search in Google Scholar

Swenson, H.A. (1975) Viscosity-strength relation in bleached pulps. I. Svensk Papperstidn.2:61–65.Search in Google Scholar

Wathén, R., Joutsimo, O., Tamminen, T. (2005) Effect of different degradation mechanisms on axial and z-directional fiber strength. Paper presented at the Advances in Paper Science and Technology: 13th Fundamental Research Symposium, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Wyatt, P.J. (1993) Light scattering and the absolute characterization of macromolecules. Anal. Chim. Acta272:1–40.10.1016/0003-2670(93)80373-SSearch in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2006-07-18
Published in Print: 2006-07-01

©2006 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York