Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 1, 2005

Comparison of intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings in patients with neonatal seizures vs. no seizures: what are the differences?

  • Keith P. Williams and France Galerneau

Abstract

Objective: To determine which intrapartum fetal heart rate parameters in the presence of severe neonatal acidosis (pH < 7.0) appropriately predicts the development of neonatal seizures in the context of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).

Methods: The intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings of 25 neonates who developed neonatal seizures secondary to HIE were compared with 25 matched neonates with similar pH and gestational age who did not develop seizures. All patients had at least 2 hours of intrapartum fetal heart rate patterns available for review. We compared the fetal heart rate parameters of prolonged deceleration, variable and late decelerations, variability, accelerations, fetal heart rate baseline and duration of the fetal heart rate abnormality. Comparison between the groups was done using chi-square for nominal data and student t-tests for continuous data.

Results: Neonates with seizures 2° HIE had a significantly longer duration of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns (72 ± 12 minutes vs 48 ± 12 minutes, p < 0.001).

Discussion: This study demonstrated that in the setting of neonatal acidosis the development of seizures is related to the period of stress (duration of the abnormal fetal heart rate pattern).

:

Corresponding author: Keith P. Williams, M.D., Yale University School of Medicine 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208063, New Haven, Ct 06520-8063/U.S.A. Tel.: +1 203-785-3091, Fax: +1 203-785-6885, E-mail:

References

1 Arbuckle TE, R Wilkins, GJ Sherman: Birth weight percentiles by gestational age in Canada. Obstet Gynecol81 (1993) 39Search in Google Scholar

2 Fleischer A, H Schulman, N Jagani, J Mitchell, G Randolph: The development of fetal acidosis in the presence of an abnormal fetal heart rate testing, the average for gestational age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol144 (1982) 55Search in Google Scholar

3 Gilstrap LC, JC Hauth, S Toussants: Second stage fetal heart rate abnormalities and neonatal acidosis. Obstet Gynecol63 (1984) 209Search in Google Scholar

4 Goldaber KGD, LG Gilstrap, KJ Leveno, JS Dax, DD McIntire: Pathologic fetal academia. Obstet Gynecol78 (1991) 1103Search in Google Scholar

5 Goodwin TM, I Belai, P Hernandez, M Durand, RH Paul: Asphyxial complications in the term newborn with severe umbilical acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol162 (1992) 1506Search in Google Scholar

6 Ingemarsson I, A Herbst, K Thorngren-Jerneck: Long-term outcome after umbilical artery acidaemia at term birth: influence of gender and duration of fetal heart rate abnormalities. BJOG104 (1997) 1123Search in Google Scholar

7 Keegan KA, F Waffurn, EJ Quilligan: Obstetric characteristics and fetal heart rate patterns of infants who convulse during the newborn period. Am J Obstet Gynecol153 (1985) 732Search in Google Scholar

8 Low JA, RS Galbraith, DW Muir, et al: Motor and cognitive deficits after intrapartum fetal asphyxia in the mature infant. Am J Obstet Gynecol158 (1988) 356Search in Google Scholar

9 Low JA, R Victory, EJ Derrick: Predictive value of electronic fetal monitoring for intrapartum fetal asphyxia with metabolic acidosis. Obstet Gynecol93 (1999) 285Search in Google Scholar

10 Low JA: Intrapartum fetal asphyxia: Definition, diagnosis and classification. Am J Obstet Gynecol176 (1997) 95710.1016/S0002-9378(97)70385-5Search in Google Scholar

11 Nagel HTC, FPHA Vandenbussche, D Oepkes, A Jennekens-Schinkel, LAEM Kaan, J Bennebroek Gravenhorst: Follow-up of children with an umbilical arterial blood pH of <7.0. Am J Obstet Gynecol173 (1995) 1758Search in Google Scholar

12 Nelson KB, JM Dambrosia, TY Tiny, JK Grether: Uncertain value of electronic fetal monitoring in predicting cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med334 (1996) 613Search in Google Scholar

13 NICHD Research Planning Workshop: Electronic fetal heart rate monitoring: Research Guidelines for interpretation. Am J Obstet Gynecol177 (1997) 138510.1016/S0002-9378(97)70079-6Search in Google Scholar

14 Painter MJ, M Scott, RPO Hirsch, P O’Donoghue, R Depp: Fetal heart rate patterns during labour: neurologic and cognitive development at six to nine years of age. Am J Obstet Gynecol159 (1988) 854Search in Google Scholar

15 Ruth VJ, KO Raivio: Perinatal brain damage: predictive value of metabolic acidosis and the Apgar score. BMJ297 (1988) 24Search in Google Scholar

16 Sarnat HB, MS Sarnat: Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress. A clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol33 (1976) 696Search in Google Scholar

17 Spencer JA, N Badawi, P Burton, J Keogh, P Penberton, F Stanley: The intrapartum CTG prior to neonatal encephalopathy at term: A case control study. BJOG104 (1997) 25Search in Google Scholar

18 Van Den Berg PP, WLDM Nelen, HW Jongsma, R Nijland, LAA Kolee, HW Nijhuis, et al: Neonatal complications in newborns with an umbilical artery pH<7.00. Am J Obstet Gynecol175 (1996) 1152Search in Google Scholar

19 Winkler CL, JC Hauth, JM Tucker, J Owen, CG Brumfield: Neonatal complications at term as related to the degree of umbilical artery acidemia. Am J Obstet Gynecol164 (1991) 637Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2005-06-01
Published in Print: 2004-09-01

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/JPM.2004.140/pdf
Scroll to top button