Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter January 6, 2022

Bounds for eigenvalues of the Dirichlet problem for the logarithmic Laplacian

  • Huyuan Chen ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Laurent Véron

Abstract

We provide bounds for the sequence of eigenvalues { λ i ( Ω ) } i of the Dirichlet problem

L Δ u = λ u  in  Ω , u = 0  in  N Ω ,

where L Δ is the logarithmic Laplacian operator with Fourier transform symbol 2 ln | ζ | . The logarithmic Laplacian operator is not positively defined if the volume of the domain is large enough. In this article, we obtain the upper and lower bounds for the sum of the first k eigenvalues by extending the Li–Yau method and Kröger’s method, respectively. Moreover, we show the limit of the quotient of the sum of the first k eigenvalues by k ln k is independent of the volume of the domain. Finally, we discuss the lower and upper bounds of the k-th principle eigenvalue, and the asymptotic behavior of the limit of eigenvalues.

MSC 2010: 35P15; 35R09

Communicated by Hitoshi Ishii


Award Identifier / Grant number: 12071189

Award Identifier / Grant number: 12001252

Award Identifier / Grant number: 20202BAB201005

Award Identifier / Grant number: 20202ACBL201001

Funding statement: This work is supported by NNSF of China, Nos. 12071189, 12001252, by the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation, Nos. 20202BAB201005, 20202ACBL201001.

A Appendix: definedness of L Δ μ z ( x )

Lemma A.1.

Let z R N { 0 } and μ z ( x ) = e - i x z for all x R N . Then L Δ μ z ( x ) is well defined for any x R N , and x L Δ μ z ( x ) is continuous and bounded in R N .

Proof.

Since the function μ z is bounded and smooth in N , L Δ μ z ( x ) is well defined if the following limit exists:

lim r + B r ( x ) B 1 ( x ) μ z ( y ) | x - y | N 𝑑 y .

If it holds, we have

L Δ μ z ( x ) = c N B 1 ( x ) μ z ( x ) - μ z ( y ) | x - y | N 𝑑 y - c N lim r + B r ( x ) B 1 ( x ) μ z ( y ) | x - y | N 𝑑 y + ρ N μ z ( x ) .

We introduce the Laplacian of μ z :

Δ μ z ( x ) = Δ e - i j x j z j = Δ ( j e - i x j z j ) = - ( j z j 2 ) j e - i x j z j = - | z | 2 μ z ( x ) .

There holds

B r ( x ) B 1 ( x ) μ z ( y ) | x - y | N 𝑑 y = μ z ( x ) B r B 1 μ z ( ζ ) | ζ | N 𝑑 ζ = - μ z ( x ) | z | 2 B r B 1 Δ μ z ( ζ ) | ζ | N 𝑑 ζ .

By Green’s formula,

B r B 1 | ζ | - N Δ μ z ( ζ ) 𝑑 ζ = B r B 1 μ z ( ζ ) Δ | ζ | - N 𝑑 ζ + ( B r B 1 ) ( | ζ | - N μ z ( ζ ) n - μ z ( ζ ) | ζ | - N n ) 𝑑 S ( ζ ) .

We have

Δ | ζ | - N = 2 N | ζ | - N - 2 ,
| ζ | - N n = { - N r - N - 1 on  B r , N on  B 1 ,

and

μ z ( ζ ) n = { - i ζ z r μ z ( ζ ) on  B r , i ζ z μ z ( ζ ) on  B 1 ,

since n is the unit outward normal vector either on B r or on B 1 . Letting r , we obtain

lim r + B r ( x ) B 1 ( x ) μ z ( y ) | x - y | N 𝑑 y = - μ z ( x ) | z | 2 ( 2 N N B 1 μ z ( ζ ) | ζ | N + 2 𝑑 ζ - B 1 ( N - i ζ z ) μ z ( ζ ) 𝑑 S ( ζ ) ) .

Finally, we obtain

L Δ μ z ( x ) = c N B 1 ( x ) μ z ( x ) - μ z ( y ) | x - y | N 𝑑 y + ρ N μ z ( x )
+ c N μ z ( x ) | z 2 | ( 2 N N B 1 μ z ( ζ ) | ζ | N + 2 𝑑 ζ - B 1 ( N - i ζ z ) μ z ( ζ ) 𝑑 S ( ζ ) ) .

The boundedness and the continuity of x L Δ μ z ( x ) follow from this formula. ∎

References

[1] F. A. Berezin, Covariant and contravariant symbols of operators, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 36 (1972), 1134–1167. Search in Google Scholar

[2] L. Caffarelli and L. Silvestre, Regularity theory for fully nonlinear integro-differential equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 62 (2009), no. 5, 597–638. 10.1002/cpa.20274Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. A. Caffarelli, S. Salsa and L. Silvestre, Regularity estimates for the solution and the free boundary of the obstacle problem for the fractional Laplacian, Invent. Math. 171 (2008), no. 2, 425–461. 10.1007/s00222-007-0086-6Search in Google Scholar

[4] H. Chen, P. Felmer and A. Quaas, Large solutions to elliptic equations involving fractional Laplacian, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 32 (2015), no. 6, 1199–1228. 10.1016/j.anihpc.2014.08.001Search in Google Scholar

[5] H. Chen and L. Véron, Initial trace of positive solutions to fractional diffusion equations with absorption, J. Funct. Anal. 276 (2019), no. 4, 1145–1200. 10.1016/j.jfa.2018.10.013Search in Google Scholar

[6] H. Chen and T. Weth, The Dirichlet problem for the logarithmic Laplacian, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 44 (2019), no. 11, 1100–1139. 10.1080/03605302.2019.1611851Search in Google Scholar

[7] H. Chen and A. Zeng, Universal inequality and upper bounds of eigenvalues for non-integer poly-Laplacian on a bounded domain, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 56 (2017), no. 5, Paper No. 131. 10.1007/s00526-017-1220-ySearch in Google Scholar

[8] Q.-M. Cheng and G. Wei, A lower bound for eigenvalues of a clamped plate problem, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 42 (2011), no. 3–4, 579–590. 10.1007/s00526-011-0399-6Search in Google Scholar

[9] Q.-M. Cheng and H. Yang, Bounds on eigenvalues of Dirichlet Laplacian, Math. Ann. 337 (2007), no. 1, 159–175. 10.1007/s00208-006-0030-xSearch in Google Scholar

[10] E. Correa and A. de Pablo, Nonlocal operators of order near zero, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 461 (2018), no. 1, 837–867. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.12.011Search in Google Scholar

[11] E. Di Nezza, G. Palatucci and E. Valdinoci, Hitchhiker’s guide to the fractional Sobolev spaces, Bull. Sci. Math. 136 (2012), no. 5, 521–573. 10.1016/j.bulsci.2011.12.004Search in Google Scholar

[12] M. M. Fall and T. Weth, Nonexistence results for a class of fractional elliptic boundary value problems, J. Funct. Anal. 263 (2012), no. 8, 2205–2227. 10.1016/j.jfa.2012.06.018Search in Google Scholar

[13] M. M. Fall and T. Weth, Monotonicity and nonexistence results for some fractional elliptic problems in the half-space, Commun. Contemp. Math. 18 (2016), no. 1, Article ID 1550012. 10.1142/S0219199715500121Search in Google Scholar

[14] M. Felsinger, M. Kassmann and P. Voigt, The Dirichlet problem for nonlocal operators, Math. Z. 279 (2015), no. 3–4, 779–809. 10.1007/s00209-014-1394-3Search in Google Scholar

[15] R. L. Frank and L. Geisinger, Two-term spectral asymptotics for the Dirichlet Laplacian on a bounded domain, Mathematical Results in Quantum Physics, World Scientific, Hackensack (2011), 138–147. 10.1142/9789814350365_0012Search in Google Scholar

[16] R. L. Frank, T. König and H. Tang, Classification of solutions of an equation related to a conformal log Sobolev inequality, Adv. Math. 375 (2020), Article ID 107395. 10.1016/j.aim.2020.107395Search in Google Scholar

[17] S. Goyal and K. Sreenadh, On the Fučik spectrum of non-local elliptic operators, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 21 (2014), no. 4, 567–588. 10.1007/s00030-013-0258-6Search in Google Scholar

[18] E. M. Harrell, II and S. Yıldırım Yolcu, Eigenvalue inequalities for Klein–Gordon operators, J. Funct. Anal. 256 (2009), no. 12, 3977–3995. 10.1016/j.jfa.2008.12.008Search in Google Scholar

[19] S. Jarohs, A. Saldaña and T. Weth, A new look at the fractional Poisson problem via the logarithmic Laplacian, J. Funct. Anal. 279 (2020), no. 11, Article ID 108732. 10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108732Search in Google Scholar

[20] S. Jarohs and T. Weth, Local compactness and nonvanishing for weakly singular nonlocal quadratic forms, Nonlinear Anal. 193 (2020), Article ID 111431. 10.1016/j.na.2019.01.021Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. Kassmann and A. Mimica, Intrinsic scaling properties for nonlocal operators, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 19 (2017), no. 4, 983–1011. 10.4171/JEMS/686Search in Google Scholar

[22] P. Kröger, Estimates for sums of eigenvalues of the Laplacian, J. Funct. Anal. 126 (1994), no. 1, 217–227. 10.1006/jfan.1994.1146Search in Google Scholar

[23] A. Laptev, Dirichlet and Neumann eigenvalue problems on domains in Euclidean spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 151 (1997), no. 2, 531–545. 10.1006/jfan.1997.3155Search in Google Scholar

[24] A. Laptev and T. Weth, Spectral properties of the logarithmic Laplacian, Anal. Math. Phys. 11 (2021), no. 3, Paper No. 133. 10.1007/s13324-021-00527-ySearch in Google Scholar

[25] P. Li and S. T. Yau, On the Schrödinger equation and the eigenvalue problem, Comm. Math. Phys. 88 (1983), no. 3, 309–318. 10.1007/BF01213210Search in Google Scholar

[26] E. Lieb, The number of bound states of one-body Schrödinger operators and the Weyl problem, Proc. Sym. Pure Math. 36 1980, 241–252. 10.1090/pspum/036/573436Search in Google Scholar

[27] R. Musina and A. I. Nazarov, On fractional Laplacians, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 39 (2014), no. 9, 1780–1790. 10.1080/03605302.2013.864304Search in Google Scholar

[28] G. Pólya, On the eigenvalues of vibrating membranes, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 11 (1961), 419–433. 10.1112/plms/s3-11.1.419Search in Google Scholar

[29] X. Ros-Oton and J. Serra, The Dirichlet problem for the fractional Laplacian: Regularity up to the boundary, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 101 (2014), no. 3, 275–302. 10.1016/j.matpur.2013.06.003Search in Google Scholar

[30] X. Ros-Oton and J. Serra, The Pohozaev identity for the fractional Laplacian, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 213 (2014), no. 2, 587–628. 10.1007/s00205-014-0740-2Search in Google Scholar

[31] G. V. Rozenbljum, Distribution of the discrete spectrum of singular differential operators, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 202 (1972), 1012–1015. Search in Google Scholar

[32] L. Schwartz, Théorie des distributions, Hermann, Paris, 1966. Search in Google Scholar

[33] H. Weyl, Das asymptotische Verteilungsgesetz der Eigenwerte linearer partieller Differentialgleichungen (mit einer Anwendung auf die Theorie der Hohlraumstrahlung), Math. Ann. 71 (1912), no. 4, 441–479. 10.1007/BF01456804Search in Google Scholar

[34] S. Yildirim Yolcu and T. Yolcu, Estimates for the sums of eigenvalues of the fractional Laplacian on a bounded domain, Commun. Contemp. Math. 15 (2013), no. 3, Article ID 1250048. 10.1142/S0219199712500484Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-16
Revised: 2021-09-01
Accepted: 2021-11-02
Published Online: 2022-01-06
Published in Print: 2023-07-01

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 30.11.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/acv-2021-0025/html
Scroll to top button