Admissibility versus A_p-Conditions on Regular Trees

References

[1] R. Alvarado and P. Hajłasz, A note on metric-measure spaces supporting Poincaré inequalities, Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. 31 (2020), 15-23.10.1007/s12210-020-00875-0Search in Google Scholar

[2] A. Björn and J. Björn, Nonlinear potential theory on metric measure space, EMS Tracts Math 17, European Math. Soc, Zürich 2011. xii+403 pp.10.4171/099Search in Google Scholar

[3] A. Björn, J. Björn, J. T. Gill and N. Shanmugalingam, Geometric analysis on Cantor sets and trees, J. Reine Angew. Math. 725 (2017), 63-114.Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. Björn, J. Björn and J. Lehrbäck, The annular decay property and capacity estimates for thin annuli, Collect. Math. 68 (2017), no. 2, 229-241.Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Björn, J. Björn and N. Shanmugalingam, Locally p-admissible measures on 𝕉, J. Funct. Anal. 278 (2020), no. 4, 108344, 17 pp.10.1016/j.jfa.2019.108344Search in Google Scholar

[6] J. Björn, Poincaré inequalities for powers and products of admissible weights, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math. 26 (2001), no. 1, 175-188.Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. Björn, S. Buckley and S. Keith, Admissible measures in one dimension, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 134 (2006), no. 3, 703-705.Search in Google Scholar

[8] S-K. Chua and R. L. Wheeden, Sharp conditions for weighted 1-dimensional Poincaré inequalities, Indiana Univ. Math. J. 49 (2000), no. 1, 143-175.Search in Google Scholar

[9] P. Hajłasz, Sobolev spaces on metric-measure spaces, in: Heat kernels and analysis on manifolds, graphs and metric spaces (Paris 2002), Contemp. Math. 338, American Mathematical Society, Providence (2003), 173-218.10.1090/conm/338/06074Search in Google Scholar

[10] P. Hajłasz and P. Koskela, Sobolev meets Poincaré, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, p. 1211-1215, 1995.Search in Google Scholar

[11] P. Hajłasz and P. Koskela, Sobolev met Poincaré, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 145 (2000), no. 688, x+101 pp.10.1090/memo/0688Search in Google Scholar

[12] J. Heinonen, T. Kilpeläinen and Martio O., Nonlinear potential theory of degenerate elliptic equations, Courier Corporation, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[13] J. Heinonen and P. Koskela, Weighted Sobolev and Poincaré inequalities and quasiregular mappings of polynomial type, Math. Scand. 77 (1995), no. 2, 251-271.Search in Google Scholar

[14] J. Heinonen and P. Koskela, Quasiconformal maps in metric spaces with controlled geometry, Acta Math. 181 (1998), 1-61.10.1007/BF02392747Search in Google Scholar

[15] J. Heinonen, P. Koskela, N. Shanmugalingam and J. Tyson, Sobolev Spaces on Metric Measure Spaces: An Approach Based on Upper Gradients, New Mathematical Monographs series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2015.10.1017/CBO9781316135914Search in Google Scholar

[16] S. Keith, Modulus and the Poincaré inequality on metric measure spaces, Math. Z. 245 (2003), no. 2, 255-292.Search in Google Scholar

[17] L. Korobenko, D. Maldonado and C. Rios, From Sobolev inequality to doubling, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 143 (2015), no. 9, 4017-4028.Search in Google Scholar

[18] P. Koskela, K. N. Nguyen and Z. Wang, Trace and density results on regular trees, arXiv:1911.00533.Search in Google Scholar

[19] P. Koskela and Z. Wang, Dyadic norm Besov-type spaces as trace spaces on regular trees, to appear in Potential Anal. arXiv:1908.06937.Search in Google Scholar

[20] K. N. Nguyen, Classification criteria for regular trees, in preparation.Search in Google Scholar

[21] K. N. Nguyen and Z. Wang, Trace operators on regular trees, in preparation.Search in Google Scholar

[22] N. Shanmugalingam, Newtonian spaces: An extension of Sobolev spaces to metric measure spaces, Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 16 (2000), 243-279.10.4171/RMI/275Search in Google Scholar