Abstract
With Hegel’s metaphysics attracting renewed attention, it is time to address a long-standing criticism: Scholars from Marx to Popper and Habermas have worried that Hegel’s metaphysics has anti-individualist and authoritarian implications, which are particularly pronounced in his Philosophy of History, since Hegel identifies historical progress with reason imposing itself on individuals. Rather than proposing an alternative non-metaphysical conception of reason, as Pippin or Brandom have done, this article argues that critics are broadly right in their metaphysical reading of Hegel’s central concepts. However, they are mistaken about what Hegel’s approach entails, when one examines the specific types of states discussed (and rejected) by the philosopher in his Philosophy of History. Even on a traditional metaphysical reading, Hegel is not only non-authoritarian; he also makes a powerful argument concerning freedom, whereupon the freest society involves collective oversight and the shaping of social structures so as to ensure that they benefit everybody.
Adorno, T. W. 2006. Zur Lehre von der Geschichte und der Freiheit. Frankfurt.Search in Google Scholar
Baumann, C. 2018a. “Irrationality and Egoism in Hegel’s Account of Right”. British Journal for the History of Philosophy (online first), DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2018.144458110.1080/09608788.2018.1444581Search in Google Scholar
–. 2018b. “Hegel and Marx on Individuality and the Universal Good”. Hegel Bulletin 39(1), 61–81.10.1017/hgl.2016.33Search in Google Scholar
Bartuschat, W. 2007. “Hegels neue Metaphysik”. Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 5, 211–34.10.1515/9783110192438.1.211Search in Google Scholar
Beiser, F., 1993. “Hegel’s Historicism”. In Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Ed. F. Beiser. Cambridge, 270–300.10.1017/CCOL0521382742.010Search in Google Scholar
–. 1995. “Hegel, a Non-Metaphysician? A Polemic”. Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 32, 1–13.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2005. Hegel. New York.10.4324/9780203087053Search in Google Scholar
Berlin, I. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Bowman, B. 2013. Hegel’s Metaphysics of Absolute Negativity. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139520201Search in Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 2009. Reason in Philosophy. Cambridge.10.4159/9780674053618Search in Google Scholar
Brooks, T. 2007. Hegel’s Political Philosophy. Edinburgh.10.3366/edinburgh/9780748625741.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Bubbio, P. 2017. “The I and World History in Hegel”. British Journal of the History of Philosophy 25(4), 706–26.10.1080/09608788.2016.1268997Search in Google Scholar
Buchwalter, A. 2016. “A Critique of Non-Metaphysical Readings of Hegel’s Practical Philosophy”. In Hegel and Metaphysics. Ed. A. Laurentis. Berlin, 71–88.10.1515/9783110424447-007Search in Google Scholar
De Boer, K. 2010. On Hegel. London.10.1057/9780230283282Search in Google Scholar
Chytry, J. 1989. The Aesthetic State. Berkeley/Los Angeles.Search in Google Scholar
Flach, W. Negation und Andersheit. Munich.Search in Google Scholar
Gardner, S. 2007. “The Limits of Naturalism and the Metaphysics of German Idealism”. In German Idealism: Contemporary Perspectives. Ed. E. Hammer. London, 19–49.Search in Google Scholar
Günther, G. 1987. Grundzüge einer Neuen Theorie des Denkens in Hegels Logik. Hamburg.10.28937/978-3-7873-2545-0Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, J, 1988. Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2000. Theorie und Praxis. Frankfurt.Search in Google Scholar
Henrich, D. 1976. “Hegels Grundoperation”. In Der Idealismus und seine Gegenwart. Ed. U. Guzzoni. Hamburg, 208–30.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1982. “Logische Form und Reale Totalität”. In Hegels Theorie des Rechts. Ed. D. Henrich/R-P. Horstmann. Stuttgart, 428–50.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1983. “Vernunft in Verwirklichung”. In Hegel. Philosophie des Rechts. Die Vorlesung von 1819/20. Ed. D. Henrich. Frankfurt, 9–39.Search in Google Scholar
Hodgson, P. 2012. Shapes of Freedom. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654956.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 2000. Suffering From Indeterminacy. Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar
Horstmann, R-P. 1979. “Subjektiver Geist und Moralität”. In Hegels philosophische Psychologie. Ed. D. Henrich. Bonn, 191–99.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1984. Ontologie und Relationen. Königstein, Ts.Search in Google Scholar
–. “Hegel über Unendlichkeit, Substanz und Subjekt”. Internationales Jahrbuch des Deutschen Idealismus 1, 183–200Search in Google Scholar
Houlgate, S. 2005. An Introduction to Hegel. Malden, MA.10.1524/hgjb.2005.7.jg.152Search in Google Scholar
–. 2006. The Opening of Hegel’s Logic. West Lafayette, IN.Search in Google Scholar
Iber, C. 2000. “Was will Hegel eigentlich mit seiner Logik?”. In Hegels Seinslogik. Ed. A. Arndt. Berlin, 13–32.10.1524/9783050047010.13Search in Google Scholar
Inwood, M. 1984. “Hegel, Plato and Greek Sittlichkeit”. In The State and Civil Society. Ed. Z. Pelczynski. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Kreines, J. 2015. Reason in the World. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190204303.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Lumsden, S. 2020. “Freedom and the Logic of History”. In Palgrave Hegel Handbook. Ed. M. Bykova/K. Westphal. Basingstoke, 467–84.10.1007/978-3-030-26597-7_24Search in Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1956. Marx Engels Werke. Vol. 1. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar
Moyar, D. 2011. Hegel’s Conscience. New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195391992.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Neuhouser, F. 2000. Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory. Cambridge.10.4159/9780674041455Search in Google Scholar
Pinkard, T. 2017. Does History Make Sense? Cambridge, MA.10.4159/9780674978782Search in Google Scholar
Pippin, R. 2000. “What is the Question for which Hegel’s Theory of Recognition is the Answer?”. European Journal of Philosophy 8, 155–72.10.4324/9781315254791-9Search in Google Scholar
–. 2008. Hegel’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511808005Search in Google Scholar
–. 2018. Hegel’s Realm of Shadows. Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226588841.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Popper, K. 1957. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Vol. 2. London.Search in Google Scholar
Russell, B. 2008. A History of Western Philosophy. New York.Search in Google Scholar
Stern, R. 2009. Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199239108.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Stolzenberg, J., 2017. “Metaphysik nach Kant”. In Metaphysik – Metaphysikkritik. Eds. H. Ferreiro/T. Hoffmann. Berlin, 75–96.Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1975. Hegel. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139171465Search in Google Scholar
Thanassas, P. 2009. “Hegel’s Hermeneutics of History”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91(1), 70–94.10.1515/AGPH.2009.04Search in Google Scholar
Theunissen, M. 1982. “Die verdrängte Intersubjektivität in Hegels Philosophie des Rechts”. In Hegels Philosophie des Rechts. Ed. D. Henrich. Stuttgart, 317–81.Search in Google Scholar
Vieweg, K. 2012. Das Denken der Freiheit. Paderborn.10.30965/9783846753040Search in Google Scholar
Westphal, K. 2003. Hegel’s Epistemology. Indianapolis, IN.Search in Google Scholar
Wood, A. 1990. Hegel’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139172257Search in Google Scholar
Yeomans, C. 2011. Freedom and Reflection. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2015. The Expansion of Autonomy. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199394548.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
