Abstract
The article discusses the accusation advanced by Plutarch and Cicero, according to which the Epicureans are unjust, as they would break the law to pursue pleasure if certain of impunity, and deals with this criticism by analyzing the Epicurean theory of law and justice and comparing it with friendship. The article argues that, from a doctrinal standpoint, philia has a higher place in the Epicurean’s priorities and a stronger efficacy than positive law in serving the naturally just. It thus concludes that, as Plutarch and Cicero suspected, the Epicurean’s ultimate loyalty does not lie with positive law, in spite of its importance for social order, but rather with the naturally just (dikaion), better secured by friendship.
Ando, C. 2000. Imperial Ideology and Provincial Loyalty in the Roman Empire. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London.10.1525/california/9780520220676.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1993. The Morality of Happiness. New York-Oxford.10.1093/0195096525.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. M. 1997. “Epicurean Justice”. Phronesis 42, 324–34.10.1163/15685289760518216Search in Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. 1973. Epicuro. Opere. Turin.Search in Google Scholar
Bailey, C. 1926. Epicurus: The Extant Remains. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Barigazzi, A. 1983. “Sul concetto epicureo della sicurezza esterna”. In ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΙΣ. Studi sull’epicureismo greco e romano offerti a Marcello Gigante. Naples, 73–92.Search in Google Scholar
Bignone, E. 1920. Epicuro. Opere, frammenti, testimonianze sulla sua vita. Bari.Search in Google Scholar
Bollack, J. 1969. “Les Maximes de l’Amitié”. In Actes du 8. Congrès, Paris 5–10 avril 1968. Association Guillame Budé. Paris, 221–43.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, E. 2002. “Epicurus on the Value of Friendship (“Sententia Vaticana” 23)”. Classical Philology 97, 68–80.10.1086/449568Search in Google Scholar
Brown, E. 2009. “Politics and Society”. In The Cambridge Companion to Epicureanism. Ed. J. Warren. Cambridge, 176–96.10.1017/CCOL9780521873475.011Search in Google Scholar
Campbell, G.L. 2003. Lucretius on Creation and Evolution. A commentary on De Rerum Natura. Book Five, lines 772–1104. Oxford.10.1093/actrade/9780199263967.book.1Search in Google Scholar
Clay, D. 1998. “Epicurus’ Κυρία Δόξα XVII”, In Paradosis and Survival. Three Chapters in the History of Epicurean Philosophy. Ed. D. Clay. Ann Arbor, 32–39.10.3998/mpub.23166Search in Google Scholar
Cosenza, P. 1996. “La dimostrazione della non eleggibilità dell’ingiustizia nella Rata Sententia XXXIV di Epicuro”. In Epicureismo greco e romano. Atti del congresso internazionale. Eds. G. Giannantoni/M. Gigante. Naples, 361–76.Search in Google Scholar
Cotta, S. 1981. “Diritto e tempo. Linee di una interpretazione fenomenologica”. In Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto 58, 119–28.Search in Google Scholar
De Witt, N. W. 1936. “Organization and Procedure in Epicurean Groups”. Classical Philology 31, 205–11.10.1086/361938Search in Google Scholar
–. 1954. Epicurus and his Philosophy. Minneapolis.Search in Google Scholar
Diaco, S. 2009. “Philia e legge nella comunità epicurea”, Bollettino della Società Filosofia Italiana 197, 3–11.Search in Google Scholar
Diano, C. 1946. Epicuri Ethica. Florence.Search in Google Scholar
Einarson, B./De Lacy, Ph. H. 1967. Plutarch’s Moralia. Vol. XIV. London/Cambridge, Mass.Search in Google Scholar
Farrington, B. 1967. The Faith of Epicurus. London.Search in Google Scholar
Goldschmidt, V. 1977. La doctrine d’Épicure et le droit. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Indelli, G./Tsouna-McKirahan, V. 1995. Philodemus. On Choices and Avoidances. Naples.Search in Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. 1983. Epicuro. Opere. Turin.Search in Google Scholar
Konstan, D. 1996. “Friendship from Epicurus to Philodemus” In Epicureismo greco e romano. Atti del congresso internazionale. Eds. G. Giannantoni/M. Gigante. Vol. 2. Naples, 387–96.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1997. Friendship in the Classical World. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511612152Search in Google Scholar
–. 2008. A Life Worthy of the Gods. The Materialist Psychology of Epicurus. Las Vegas/Zurich/Athens.Search in Google Scholar
Konstan, D./Clay, D./Glad, C. E./Thom, J. C./Ware, J. (eds.) 1998. Philodemus. On Frank Criticism. Atlanta.Search in Google Scholar
Long, A. A./Sedley, D. N. (eds.) 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139165907Search in Google Scholar
Longo Auricchio, F. (ed.) 1988. Ermarco. Frammenti. Naples.Search in Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. 1988. Epicurus’ Ethical Theory. Ithaca/London.10.7591/9780801466885Search in Google Scholar
Morel, P. M. 2007. Lire Épicure et les épicuriens. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
O’Keefe, T. 2001a. “Is Epicurean Friendship Altruistic?”. Apeiron 34, 269–305.10.1515/APEIRON.2001.34.4.269Search in Google Scholar
–. 2014. Epicureanism. London/New York.10.4324/9781315711645Search in Google Scholar
Opocher, E. 1981. “Diritto e tempo”. In Rivista internazionale di filosofia del diritto 58, 129–36.Search in Google Scholar
Philippson, R. 1910. “Die Rechtsphilosophie der Epikureer”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 23, 289–337.10.1515/agph.1910.23.3.289Search in Google Scholar
Rackham, H. (ed.) 1967. Cicero. De finibus bonorum et malorum. London/Cambridge, Mass.Search in Google Scholar
Rist, J. M. 1980. “Epicurus on Friendship”. Classical Philology 75, 121–40.10.1086/366549Search in Google Scholar
Roskam, G. 2007a. ‘Live Unnoticed’ (Λάθε βιώσας). On the Vicissitudes of an Epicurean Doctrine. Leiden/Boston.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2007b. A Commentary on Plutarch’s De Latenter Vivendo. Leuven.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2012. “Will the Epicurean Sage Break the Law if He is Perfectly Sure that He Will Escape Detection?”. Transactions of the American Philological Association 142, 23–40.10.1353/apa.2012.0000Search in Google Scholar
Schmid, W. 1962. “Epikur”. In Reallexikon für Antike und Christentum V. Stuttgart, 681–819.Search in Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1988. “The Inferential Foundations of Epicurean Ethics”. In Ethics. Companions to Ancient Thought 4. Ed. S. Everson. Cambridge, 129–50.10.1017/CBO9781139166348.006Search in Google Scholar
Seel, G. 1996. “Farà il saggio qualcosa che le leggi vietano, sapendo che non sarà scoperto?”. In Epicureismo greco e romano. Atti del congresso internazionale. Eds. G. Giannantoni/M. Gigante M. Vol 1. Naples, 341–60.Search in Google Scholar
Smith, M. F. (ed.) 1993. Diogenes of Oinoanda. The Epicurean Inscription. Naples.Search in Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. 2001. “Cicéron et Philodème: Quelques considerations sur l’éthique”. In Cicéron et Philodème. La polémique en philosophie. Eds. C. Auvry-Assayas/D. Delattre. Paris, 159–72.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2007. The Ethics of Philodemus. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199292172.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Usener, H. 1887. Epicurea. Leipzig, repr. with Italian translation and notes by I. Ramelli. Milan 2002.10.1017/CBO9780511711077Search in Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. 1987. “The Justice of the Epicurean Wise Man”. Classical Quarterly 37, 402–22.10.1017/S0009838800030597Search in Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2004. Facing Death. Epicurus and his Critics. Oxford.10.1093/0199252890.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
–. 2014. The Pleasures of Reason in Plato, Aristotle, and the Hellenistic Hedonists. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139178976Search in Google Scholar
–. 2015. “Epicurean Pleasure in Cicero’s De Finibus”. In Cicero De Finibus. Philosophical Approaches. Eds. J. Annas/G. Betegh. Cambridge, 41–76.10.1017/CBO9781139871396.003Search in Google Scholar
Westman, R. 1955. Plutarch gegen Kolotes. Seine Schrift “Adversus Colotem” als philosophiegeschichtliche Quelle. Helsingfors.Search in Google Scholar
Wolff, F. 2000. L’être, l’homme, le disciple. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
