Abstract
The aim of this article is to clarify an aspect of Descartes’s conception of mind that seriously impacts on the standard objections against Cartesian Dualism. By a close reading of Descartes’s writings on imagination, I argue that the capacity to imagine does not inhere as a mode in the mind itself, but only in the embodied mind, that is, a mind that is not united to the body does not possess the faculty to imagine. As a mode considered as a general property, and not as an instance of it, belongs to the essence of the substance, and as imagination (like sensation) arises from the mind-body union, then the problem arises of knowing to what extent a Cartesian embodied mind is separable from the body.
Alanen, L. 2003. Descartes’s Concept of Mind. Cambridge, MA.10.4159/9780674020108Search in Google Scholar
–. 1986. “On Descartes’s Argument for Dualism and the Distinction between Different Kinds of Beings”. In The Logic of Being: Historical Studies. Eds. S. Knuuttila/J. Hintikka. Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-009-4780-1_9Search in Google Scholar
Almog, J. 2002. What Am I? Descartes and the Mind-Body Problem. New York.10.1093/0195146468.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Aquila, R. E. 1988. “The Cartesian and a Certain ‘Poetic’ Notion of Consciousness”. Journal of the History of Ideas 49, 543–562.10.2307/2709673Search in Google Scholar
Caton, H. 1973. The Origin of Subjectivity. An Essay on Descartes. New Haven.Search in Google Scholar
Chalmers, David. 1996. The Conscious Mind. In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford/New York.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2002. Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford/New York.Search in Google Scholar
Chappell, V. 1994. “L’homme cartésien”. In Descartes: Objecter et Répondre. Eds. J.-M. Beyssade/J.-L. Marion. Paris, 403–426.10.3917/puf.beyss.1994.01.0403Search in Google Scholar
Cottingham, J. 1978. “Descartes on ‘Thought’”. The Philosophical Quarterly 28, 208–214.10.2307/2218841Search in Google Scholar
–. 1985. “Cartesian Trialism”. Mind 94, 218–230.10.1093/mind/XCIV.374.218Search in Google Scholar
–. 1998. Philosophy and the Good Life. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511612237Search in Google Scholar
Curley, E. M. 1978. Descartes Against the Skeptics. Cambridge.10.4159/harvard.9780674330245Search in Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1984–1991. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Eds. J. Cottingham/R. Stoothoff/D. Murdoch (transl.). 3 vols. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781107340824Search in Google Scholar
–. 1996. Œuvres complètes. Eds. Ch. Adam/P. Tannery. New presentation of J. Beaude/P. Costabel/A. Gabbey/B. Rochot. 11 vols. Paris, 1964–1974.Search in Google Scholar
Fòti, V. 1986. “The Cartesian Imagination”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (4), 631–642.10.2307/2107673Search in Google Scholar
Garber, D. 1992. Descartes’ Metaphysical Physics. Chicago.10.1017/CCOL0521366232.011Search in Google Scholar
Gaukroger, S. 1992. “The Nature of Abstract Reasoning: Philosophical Aspects of Descartes’ Work in Algebra”. In Cambridge Companion to Descartes. Ed. J. Cottingham. New York/Cambridge, 91–114.10.1017/CCOL0521366232.004Search in Google Scholar
Gueroult, M. 1968. Descartes selon l’ordre des raisons. Vol. 2. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Heil, J. 1998. Philosophy of Mind: a Contemporary Introduction. London.10.4324/9780203288276Search in Google Scholar
Heinnämaa, S./Lähteenmäki, V./Remes, P. 2007. Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy. Dordrecht.10.1007/978-1-4020-6082-3Search in Google Scholar
Hofman, P. 2002. “Descartes’ Theory of Distinction”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 44, 57–78.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2002.tb00142.xSearch in Google Scholar
–. 1999. “Cartesian Composites”. Journal of the History of the History of Philosophy 37, 251–270.10.1353/hph.2008.0912Search in Google Scholar
–. 1986. “The Unity of Descartes’s Man”. The Philosophical Review 95, 339–370.10.2307/2185464Search in Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1999. “Descartes the Dualist”. Ratio 12, 114–127.10.1111/1467-9329.00082Search in Google Scholar
Kim, J. 2001. “Lonely Souls: Causality and Substance Dualism”. In Soul, Body and Survival: Essays on the Metaphysics of Human Persons. Ed. K. Corcoran. Ithaca, 30–43.10.7591/9781501723520-004Search in Google Scholar
Laporte, J. 1945/2000. Le Rationalisme de Descartes. Paris.10.3917/puf.bondi.1988.01Search in Google Scholar
Liard, L. 1882. Descartes. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Lyons, J. D. 1999. “Descartes and Modern Imagination”. Philosophy and Literature 23, 302–312.10.1353/phl.1999.0043Search in Google Scholar
Marion, J.-L. 1975/2000. Sur l’Ontologie Grise de Descartes: Science Cartésienne et Savoir Aristotélicien dans les Regulae. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
McRae, R. 1972. “Descartes’ Definition of Thought”. In Cartesian Studies. Ed. R. J. Butler. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
O’Connor, T./Robb, D. (eds). 2003. Philosophy of Mind: Contemporary Readings. London.10.4324/9780203987698Search in Google Scholar
Papineau, D. 2009. “The Causal Closure of the Physical and Naturalism”. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind. Eds. B. Mclaughlin/A. Beckermann/S. Walter. Oxford.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199262618.003.0003Search in Google Scholar
Radner, D. 1988. “Thought and Consciousness in Descartes”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 26 (3), 439–452.10.1353/hph.1988.0064Search in Google Scholar
Rathmann, B. 1981. “L’imagination et le doute: essai sur la genèse de la pensée cartésienne”. Papers on French Seventeenth-Century Literature 8(15), 57–73.Search in Google Scholar
Rodis-Lewis, G. 1950. Le Problème de l’Inconscient et le Cartésianisme. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Roy, J.-H. 1944. L’imagination selon Descartes. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Rozemond, M. 2006. “The Nature of the Mind”. In The Blackwell Guide to Descartes’ Meditations. Ed. S. Gaukroger. Oxford, 48–66.10.1002/9780470776476.ch4Search in Google Scholar
–. 1998. Descartes’s Dualism. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Schmaltz, T. 1992. “Descartes and Malebranche on Mind and Mind-Body Union”. The Philosophical Review 101, 281–325.10.2307/2185536Search in Google Scholar
–. 1996. Malebranche’s Theory of the Soul: a Cartesian Interpretation. New York/Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Schouls; P. A. 2000. Descartes and the Possibility of Science. Ithaca.Search in Google Scholar
Sepper, D. L. 1996. Descartes’ Imagination: Proportion, Images, and the Activity of Thinking. Berkeley/Los Angeles.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1989. “Descartes and the Eclipse of Imagination, 1618–1630”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 27, 379–403.10.1353/hph.1989.0070Search in Google Scholar
Thiel, U. 2011. The Early Modern Subject: Self-Consciousness and Personal Identity from Descartes to Hume. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199542499.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Verbeek, T. 1988. La querelle d’Utrecht. Descartes et Martin Schoock. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Wilson, M. 1978. Descartes. London.Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
