Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 8, 2018

Locke and the Methodology of Newton’s Principia

Patrick J. Connolly

Abstract

A number of commentators have recently suggested that there is a puzzle surrounding Locke’s acceptance of Newton’s Principia. On their view, Locke understood natural history as the primary methodology for natural philosophy and this commitment was at odds with an embrace of mathematical physics. This article considers various attempts to address this puzzle and finds them wanting. It then proposes a more synoptic view of Locke’s attitude towards natural philosophy. Features of Locke’s biography show that he was deeply interested in mathematical physics long before the publication of the Principia. This interest was in line with important developments in the Royal Society. It is argued that Locke endorsed a two-stage approach to natural philosophy which was consistent with an embrace of both natural history and mathematical physics. The Principia can be understood as consistent with this approach.

Anstey, P. R. 2011. John Locke and Natural Philosophy. New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589777.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

–. 2005. “Experimental Versus Speculative Natural Philosophy”. In The Science of Nature in the Seventeenth Century. Eds. P. R. Anstey/J. A. Schuster. Dordrecht, 215–242.10.1007/1-4020-3703-1_9Search in Google Scholar

Axtell, J. L. 1969. “Locke, Newton, and the Two Cultures”. In John Locke: Problems and Perspectives. Ed. J. W. Yolton. London, 165–182.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1965. “Locke, Newton, and The Elements of Natural Philosophy”. Paedagogica Europaea 1, 235–245.10.2307/1502458Search in Google Scholar

Bennet, J./Remnant, P. 1978. “How Matter Might at First Be Made”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, suppl. 4, 1–11.10.1080/00455091.1978.10717078Search in Google Scholar

Biener, Z./Smeenk, C. 2012. “Cotes’s Queries: Newton’s Empiricism and Conceptions of Matter”. In Interpreting Newton. Eds. A. Janiak/E. Schliesser. New York, 105–137.Search in Google Scholar

Boyle, R. 1999–2000. The Works of Robert Boyle. Eds. M. Hunter/E. B. Davis. London.Search in Google Scholar

Buchdahl, G. 1961. The Image of Newton and Locke in the Age of Reason. London.Search in Google Scholar

Cajori, F. (ed.) 1934. Sir Isaac Newton’s Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy and His System of the World. Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Domski, M. 2012. “Locke’s Qualified Embrace of Newton’s Principia”. In Interpreting Newton. Eds. A. Janiak/E. Schliesser. New York, 48–68.10.1017/CBO9780511994845.005Search in Google Scholar

Feingold, M. 2001. “Mathematicians and Naturalists: Sir Isaac Newton and the Royal Society”. In Isaac Newton’s Natural Philosophy. Eds. J. Z. Buchwald/I. B. Cohen. Cambridge, MA, 77–102.Search in Google Scholar

Feingold, M. 1988. “Partnership in Glory: Newton and Locke through the Enlightenment and Beyond”. In Newton’s Scientific and Philosophical Legacy. Eds. P. B. Scheurer/G. Debrock. Dordrecht, 291–308.10.1007/978-94-009-2809-1_21Search in Google Scholar

Gorham, G./Slowick, E. 2014. “Locke and Newton on Space and Time and Their Sensible Measures”. In Newton and Empiricism. Eds. Z. Biener/E. Schliesser. New York, 119–137.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199337095.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Grew, N. 1674. A Discourse Made Before the Royal Society, […] concerning the Nature, Causes, and Power, of Mixture. London. Printed for J. Martyn.Search in Google Scholar

Harper, W. L. 2011. Isaac Netwon’s Scientific Method: Turning Data into Evidence About Gravity & Cosmology. New York.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570409.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, J./Laslett, P. 1971. The Library of John Locke. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Hooke, R. 1665. Micrographia. London. Printed for J. Martyn.Search in Google Scholar

Hunter, M./Wood, P. W. 1986. “Toward Solomon’s House: Rival Strategies for Reforming the Early Royal Society”. History of Science 24, 49–107.10.1177/007327538602400103Search in Google Scholar

Jalobeanu, D. 2011. “The Cartesians of the Royal Society: The Debate over Collisions and the Nature of Body (1668–1670)”. In Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion. Eds. D. Jaobeanu/P. R. Anstey. New York, 103–129.Search in Google Scholar

Lough, J. (ed.) 1950. Locke’s Travels in France. Cambridge.10.1093/res/VI.21.298Search in Google Scholar

Locke, J. 1975. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. P. H. Nidditch. Oxford.10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020Search in Google Scholar

–. 1823. The Works of John Locke. London.Search in Google Scholar

Milton, J. R. 2012. “Locke and the Elements of Natural Philosophy: Some Problems of Attribution”. Intellectual History Review 22, 199–219.10.1080/17496977.2012.693743Search in Google Scholar

Murray, G./Harper, W./Wilson, C. 2011. “Huygens, Wren, Wallis, and Newton on Rules of Impact and Reflection”. In Vanishing Matter and the Laws of Motion. Eds. D. Jaobeanu/P. R. Anstey. New York, 153–191.Search in Google Scholar

Newton, I. 2004. Philosophical Writings. Ed. A. Janiak. New York.10.1017/CBO9780511809293Search in Google Scholar

Parker, S. 1666. A Free and Impartial Censure of the Platonick Philosophie. London.Search in Google Scholar

Phemister, P. 1993. “Locke, Sergeant, and Scientific Method”. In The Rise of Modern Philosophy. Ed. T. Sorell. Oxford, 231–249.Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, G. A. J. 2010. “John Locke and the Limits of Scientia”. In Scientia in Early Modern Philosophy. Eds. T. Sorell/G. A. J. Rogers/J. Kraye. Dordrecht, 129–136.10.1007/978-90-481-3077-1_9Search in Google Scholar

–. 1978. “Locke’s Essay and Newton’s Principia”. Journal of the History of Ideas 39, 217–232.10.2307/2708776Search in Google Scholar

Schuurman, P. 2003. “Willem Jacob’s Gravesande’s Philosophical Defence of Newtonian Physics: On the Various Uses of Locke”. In The Philosophy of John Locke: New Perspectives. Ed. P. Anstey. New York, 43–57.Search in Google Scholar

Shapiro, B. 1979. “History and Natural History in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century England: An Essay on the Relationship between Humanism and Science”. In English Scientific Virtuosi in the 16th and 17th Centuries. Eds. B. Shapiro/R. G. Frank. Los Angeles, 3–55.Search in Google Scholar

Stein, H. 1990a. “On Locke ‘the Great Huygenius, and the Incomparable Mr. Newton’”. In Philosophical Perspectives on Newtonian Science. Eds. P. Bricker/R. I. G. Hughes. Cambridge, 17–47.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1990b. “‘From the Phenomena of Motions to the Forces of Nature?’ Hypothesis or Deduction?”. Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2, 209–222.10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1990.2.193069Search in Google Scholar

Turnbull, H. W. (ed.) 1961. The Correspondence of Isaac Newton. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Yolton, J. 1970. Locke and the Compass of Human Understanding. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-09-08
Published in Print: 2018-09-05

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow