Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 9, 2022

Spinoza’s Infinite Shortcut to the Contingent Appearance of Things

  • Sanja Särman EMAIL logo


Spinoza’s own words seem to commit him to necessitarianism. Nonetheless attempts have been made to make room for contingency in Spinozism. Two impressive arguments of this kind are Curley 1969 and Newlands 2010. Both these arguments appeal to Spinoza’s claim that all finite things are locked in an infinite nexus of causal relations (1p28). The question central to this paper is whether contingency can indeed be derived from an infinity of causal ancestors. The goal of the paper is twofold. First, I aim to present an alternative reading of the relation between infinity and Spinoza’s concept of contingency. On my reading, while the infinity of the causal ancestry of finite things does not ground any objective metaphysical contingency on their part, it is a condition which must obtain if they are to appear as contingent. Second, I aim to challenge the derivations of contingency from infinity mentioned above. I will do so by targeting Curley’s assumption that propositions rather than things are the main bearers of modality. On Newlands’ interpretation, the conceivability of things as either contingent or necessary makes the world more perfect than it would otherwise have been. By drawing upon Spinoza’s analysis of “negative” properties (such as evil), I question whether beliefs about contingency contribute to the perfection of the world in virtue of truly attributing the property of objective contingency to things.

Bennett, J. 1984. A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2001. Learning from Six Philosophers. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Boehm, O. 2016. “The Principle of Sufficient Reason, the Ontological Argument and the Is/Ought Distinction”. European Journal of Philosophy, 24(3), 556–79.10.1111/ejop.12130Search in Google Scholar

Curley, E. 1969. Spinoza’s Metaphysics: An Essay in Interpretation. Cambridge, MA.10.4159/harvard.9780674330450Search in Google Scholar

Curley, E./Walski, G. 1999. “Spinoza’s Necessitarianism Reconsidered”. In New Essays on the Rationalists. Eds. G. Rocco/C. Huenemann. New York, 241–62.10.1093/0195165411.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Della Rocca, M. 1996. Representation and the Mind Body Problem. New York.Search in Google Scholar

Garrett, D. 1991. “Spinoza’s Necessitarianism”. In God and Nature: Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Ed. Y. Yovel. Leiden.10.1093/oso/9780195307771.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

–. 2018. Nature and Necessity in Spinoza’s Philosophy. New York.10.1093/oso/9780195307771.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Griffin, M. V. 2008. “Necessitarianism in Spinoza and Leibniz”. In Interpreting Spinoza: Critical Essays. Ed. C. Huenemann. New York.10.1017/CBO9780511487200.006Search in Google Scholar

Koistinen, O. 2003. “Spinoza’s Proof of Necessitarianism”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67(2), 283–310.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2003.tb00291.xSearch in Google Scholar

Leibniz, G. W. 1885. Monadology. In Die philosophischen Schriften, vol. 6. Ed. C. I. Gerhardt. Berlin.10.1007/978-94-010-1426-7_68Search in Google Scholar

Lovejoy, A. O. 1933. The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, M. 2007. “Spinoza’s Arguments for the Existence of God”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75(2), 269–97.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2007.00076.xSearch in Google Scholar

Mellor, D. H. 2004. “For Facts as Causes and Effects”. In Causation and Counterfactuals. Eds. J. Collins/N. Hall/L. Paul. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Mason, R. 1997. The God of Spinoza – A Philosophical Study. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511583230.012Search in Google Scholar

Newlands, S. 2010. “The Harmony of Spinoza and Leibniz”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 81(1), 64–104.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00354.xSearch in Google Scholar

Newlands, S. 2017. “Spinoza and the Metaphysics of Perfection”. In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide. Ed. Y. Melamed. Cambridge.10.1017/9781316339213.014Search in Google Scholar

Peterman, A. 2015. “Spinoza on Extension”. Philosopher’s Imprint 15(14), 1–23.Search in Google Scholar

Särmann, S. 2018. “Infinity in Spinoza’s Therapy of the Passions”. In Infinity in Early Modern Philosophy. Eds. O. Nachtomy/R. Winegar. Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-94556-9_6Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, S. 2008. “Wahrheit und Adäquatheit bei Spinoza”. Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung, 62(2), 209–32.10.3196/004433008784718364Search in Google Scholar

Spinoza, B. 1925. Spinoza Opera. Ed. C. Gebhardt. Heidelberg.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1988. The Collected Works of Spinoza. Vol. I. Ed./trans. E. Curley. Princeton.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2016. The Collected Works of Spinoza. Vol. II. Ed./trans. E. Curley. Princeton.Search in Google Scholar

Steinberg, D. 1981. “Spinoza’s Theory of the Eternity of the Mind”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 11(1), 35–68.10.4324/9781315187983-23Search in Google Scholar

Steinberg, J. 2017. “Two Puzzles Concerning Spinoza’s Conception of Belief.” European Journal of Philosophy 26(1), 261–82.10.1111/ejop.12218Search in Google Scholar

Williams, B. 1992. Shame and Necessity. Oakland.10.1525/9780520915282Search in Google Scholar

Wolf, A. 1926. “Spinoza’s Conception of the Attributes of Substance.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 27, 177–92.10.1525/9780520319349-005Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-06-09
Published in Print: 2022-06-30

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 8.12.2023 from
Scroll to top button