Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter November 6, 2021

Categories in Topics I 9: A New Plea For a Traditional Interpretation

Paolo Fait

Abstract

The list of katēgoriai presented at the start of Top. I 9 was traditionally interpreted as a version of the canonical Aristotelian list of categories, and as largely equivalent to the list we find in Categories 4. Accordingly, its first item, the ‘what it is’, was identified with the category of substance. This interpretation has been challenged by several scholars, all sharing the view that the ‘what it is’ in Top. I 9 cannot be substance, since it collects items belonging to all Aristotelian categories (e. g. human being, colour, length). Rather, they say, it is a manner of predication – i. e. essential predication – and can only determine an ontologically miscellaneous class of items. Against this family of proposals, I argue afresh that the traditional interpretation is almost entirely correct. To this purpose, I take advantage of the distinction between kinds of predicate and kinds of predication.

Ackrill, J. L. 1963. Aristotle’s Categories and De Interpretatione. Oxford.10.1093/actrade/9780198720867.book.1Search in Google Scholar

Ademollo, F. Forthcoming. “The Anatomy of Primary Substance in Aristotle’s Categories”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy.Search in Google Scholar

Angioni, L. 2018. Review of Malink 2013. Ancient Philosophy 38, 211–16.Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1994. Aristotle, The Posterior Analytics. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Bodéüs, R. 2002. Aristote, Catégories. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 2013. “Two Doctrines of the Categories in Aristotle: Topics, Categories, and Metaphysics”. In Aristotle on Method and Metaphysics. Ed. E. Feser. London, 68–101.10.1057/9781137367907_5Search in Google Scholar

Brunschwig, J. 1967. Aristote, Topiques, Tome I: I–IV. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. 2001. A Map of Metaphysics Zeta. Pittsburgh.Search in Google Scholar

Crivelli, P. 2017. “Being-Said-Of in Aristotle’s Categories”. Rivista di Filosofia Neoscolastica 3, 531–56.Search in Google Scholar

Delcomminette, S. 2009. “Catégories, prédication et relation”. Anais de Filosofia Clássica 3, 30–49.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2018. Aristote et la nécessité. Paris.Search in Google Scholar

Di Lascio, E.V. 2007. “Solecisms on Things. The Arguments παρὰ τὸ σχῆμα τῆς λέξεως in Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations”. Antiquorum Philosophia 1, 171–204.Search in Google Scholar

Ebert, T. 1985. “Gattungen der Prädikate und Gattungen des Seienden bei Aristoteles: Zum Verhältnis von Cat. 4 und Top. I 9”. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 67, 113–38.10.1515/agph.1985.67.2.113Search in Google Scholar

Fait, P. 2007. Aristotele, Le confutazioni sofistiche. Roma-Bari.Search in Google Scholar

–. Forthcoming. “Aristotle and the Third Man Argument”. In Aristote, Sur les Idées. Edition, traduction, études. Eds. M. Crubellier/L. Gazziero. Leuven.Search in Google Scholar

Frede, M. [1981]/1987a. Categories in Aristotle. In his Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis, 29–48 (originally in Studies in Aristotle. Ed. D. J. O’Meara. Washington DC, 1–24).10.2307/j.ctv1765z.5Search in Google Scholar

–. [1978]/1987b. Individuals in Aristotle. In his Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis, 49–71 (originally in Antike und Abendland 24, 16–39).10.1515/9783110241365.16Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, C. M. [1925]/1979. The Aristotelian Categories. In Articles on Aristotle: 3. Metaphysics. Eds. J. Barnes/M. Schofield/R. Sorabji. London, 1–12 (originally in Classical Quarterly 19, 75–84).10.1017/S0009838800007308Search in Google Scholar

Granieri, R. 2016. “Systems of Predication: Aristotle’s Categories in Topics, I, 9”. Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale 27, 1–18.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, H. 2011. “Medieval Commentators on Aristotle’s Topics I.9: Texts 1200–1250”. Cahiers de l’Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec et Latin 80, 89–135.Search in Google Scholar

Husik, I. [1904]/1952. “The Categories of Aristotle”. In his Philosophical Essays. Eds. M. C. Nahm/L. Strauss. Oxford, 96–112 (originally in The Philosophical Review 13, 514–28).10.2307/2176861Search in Google Scholar

Irwin, T. 1988. Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford.10.1093/0198242905.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kahn, C. 1978. “Questions and Categories. Aristotle’s Doctrine of Categories in the Light of Modern Research”. In Questions. Ed. H. Hiz. Dordrecht, 227–78.10.1007/978-94-009-9509-3_8Search in Google Scholar

Kapp, E. [1920]/1968. Die Kategorienlehre in der aristotelischen Topik. In his Ausgewählte Schriften. Eds. H. und I. Diller. Berlin, 215–52 (publication of the author’s 1920 Habilitationsschrift).Search in Google Scholar

Kohl, M. 2008. “Substancehood and Subjecthood in Aristotle’s Categories”. Phronesis 53, 152–79.10.1163/156852808X278712Search in Google Scholar

Kosman, A. 1967. “Aristotle’s First Predicament”. The Review of Metaphysics 20, 483–506.Search in Google Scholar

Kosman, A. 2013. The Activity of Being. An Essay on Aristotle’s Ontology. Oxford.10.4159/harvard.9780674075023Search in Google Scholar

Malink, M. 2007. “Categories in Topics I 9”. Rhizai 4, 271–94.10.4159/harvard.9780674726352.c14Search in Google Scholar

Malink, M. 2013. Aristotle’s Modal Logic. Harvard.10.4159/harvard.9780674726352Search in Google Scholar

Malcolm, J. 1981. “On the Generation and Corruption of the Categories”. The Review of Metaphysics 33, 662–81.Search in Google Scholar

Mansion, S. 1968. Notes sur la doctrine des catégories dans les Topiques. In Aristotle on Dialectic. Ed. G. E. L. Owen. Oxford, 189–01.Search in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 1995. “Metaphysics, Dialectic and the Categories”. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 100, 311–37.Search in Google Scholar

Peramatzis, M. 2016. “Aristotle’s Metaphysical Level of ‘Logical’ Investigation”. In The Aristotelian Tradition. Eds. B. Bydén/C. Thomsen Thörnquist. Toronto, 81–130.Search in Google Scholar

Perin, C. 2007. “Substantial Universals in Aristotle’s Categories”. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 33, 125–44.Search in Google Scholar

Rapp, C./Wagner, T. 2004. Aristoteles, Topik. Stuttgart.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, R. 1997. Aristotle, Topics, Books I and VIII. Oxford.10.1093/oseo/instance.00258598Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-11-06

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston