Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter May 27, 2021

Kant on Civil Self-Sufficiency

Luke Davies EMAIL logo

Abstract

Kant distinguishes between ‘active’ and ‘passive’ citizens and holds that only the former are civilly self-sufficient and possess rights of political participation. Such rights are important, since for Kant state institutions are a necessary condition for individual freedom. Thus, only active citizens are entitled to contribute to a necessary condition for the freedom of each. I argue that Kant attributes civil self-sufficiency to those who are not under the authority of any private individual for their survival. This reading is more textually grounded than the dominant reading, which understands civil self-sufficiency in terms of economic relations alone. I further argue that Kant was interested in relations of authority because he was concerned to eliminate certain forms of corruption. This indicates that Kant’s contested distinction between active and passive citizens was a response to a key problem of any account of public lawgiving.

Aune, B. 1979. Kant’s Theory of Morals. Princeton.10.1515/9781400853175Search in Google Scholar

Baynes, K. 1989. “Kant on Property Rights and the Social Contract.” The Monist 72(3), 433–53.10.5840/monist198972319Search in Google Scholar

Beiner, R. 2010. “Paradoxes in Kant’s Account of Citizenship.” In Responsibility in Context. Ed. by G. Ognjenovic, 19–34. London.10.1007/978-90-481-3037-5_3Search in Google Scholar

Byrd, S./Hruschka, J. 2010. Kant’s Doctrine of Right: A Commentary. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511712050Search in Google Scholar

Clark, Ch. 2008. Iron Kingdom: the Rise and Downfall of Prussia 1600–1947. London.Search in Google Scholar

Davies, L. Forthcoming. “Active Citizenship and Kantian Republicanism”. In Kant on Humanity and Personality. Eds. L. Caranti/F. Silva. Hildesheim.Search in Google Scholar

Dierksmeier, C. 2002. “Kant on ‘Selbständigkeit’.” Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 1(1), 49–63.Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, E. 2005. Kant’s Politics: Provisional Theory for an Uncertain World. New Haven.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2006. “Citizenship and Property Rights: A New Look at Social Contract Theory.” The Journal of Politics 68(3), 544–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00444.x.10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00444.xSearch in Google Scholar

Eze, E. C. 1997. “The Color of Reason.” In Post Colonial African Philosophy: A Critical Reader. Ed. by E. C. Eze, 103–40. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Fichte, J. G. 2000. Foundations of Natural Right. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Flikschuh, K. 2000. Kant and Modern Political Philosophy. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511487187Search in Google Scholar

George, R. 1988. “The Liberal Tradition, Kant, and the Pox.” Dialogue 27(2), 195–206.10.1017/S0012217300019715Search in Google Scholar

Grcic, J. 1986. “Kant on Revolution and Economic Inequality.” Kant-Studien 77(4), 447–57.Search in Google Scholar

Guyer, P. 2000. Kant on Freedom, Law and Happiness. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139173339Search in Google Scholar

Hagan, W. 2008. Ordinary Prussians: Brandenburg Junkers and Villagers, 1500–1840. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Hasan, R. 2018. “Freedom and Poverty in the Kantian State.” European Journal of Philosophy 26(3), 911–31.10.1111/ejop.12331Search in Google Scholar

Hill, Th./Boxill, B. 2001. “Kant and Race.” In Race and Racism. Ed. by B. Boxill, 448–71. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

James, D. 2016. “Independence and Property in Kant’s Rechtslehre.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24(2), 302–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09608788.2015.1121134.10.1080/09608788.2015.1121134Search in Google Scholar

Kant, I. 1996. Practical Philosophy. Trans. with notes by M. Gregor and an introduction by A. Wood. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511813306Search in Google Scholar

–. 2007. Anthropology, History, Education. Trans. by R. B. Louden/G. Zöller. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511791925Search in Google Scholar

–. 2016. Lectures and Drafts on Political Philosophy. Trans. by K. R. Westphal. Cambridge.10.1017/9781139046237Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, A. 1999. Welfare in the Kantian State. Oxford.10.1093/0198294670.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kersting, W. 1992a. “Kant’s Concept of the State.” In Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Ed. by H. Williams, 143–65. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1992b. “Politics, Freedom and Order: Kant’s Political Philosophy.” In Cambridge Companion to Kant. Ed. by P. Guyer, 342–66. Cambridge.10.1017/CCOL0521365872.012Search in Google Scholar

Kleingeld, P. 1993. “The Problematic Status of Gender-Neutral Language in the History of Philosophy: The Case of Kant.” The Philosophical Forum 20(2), 134–50.10.4324/9781315252629-6Search in Google Scholar

–. 2018. “The Principle of Autonomy in Kant’s Moral Theory: Its Rise and Fall.” In Kant on Persons and Agency. Ed. by E. Watkins, 61–79. Cambridge.10.1017/9781316856529.005Search in Google Scholar

Kuehn, M. 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781107050433Search in Google Scholar

LeBar, M. 1999. “Kant on Welfare.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29(2), 225–49.10.1080/00455091.1999.10717512Search in Google Scholar

Maliks, R. 2014. Kant’s Politics in Context. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645152.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Melton, J. Van Horn. 1988. Absolutism and the Eighteenth-Century Origins of Compulsory Schooling in Prussia and Austria. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Mendus, S. 1992. “Kant: An Honest but Narrow-Minded Bourgeois?” In Essays on Kant’s Political Philosophy. Edited by H. Williams, 166–90. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar

Moran, K. Forthcoming. “Kant on Traveling Blacksmiths and Passive Citizenship.” Kant-Studien.10.1515/kant-2021-0004Search in Google Scholar

Mulholland, L. 1990. Kant’s System of Rights. New York.Search in Google Scholar

Murphy, J. G. 1994. Kant: The Philosophy of Right. Macon.10.1007/978-1-349-15384-8Search in Google Scholar

Pateman, C. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Stanford.10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss468Search in Google Scholar

Pinheiro Walla, A. 2019. “A Kantian Foundation for Welfare Rights.” Jurisprudence, 1–16. Published online ahead of print.10.1080/20403313.2019.1700700Search in Google Scholar

Pinkard, T. 1999. “Kant, Citizenship, and Freedom.” In Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre. Edited by O. Höffe, 155–72. Berlin.Search in Google Scholar

Pinzani, A./Sánchez Madrid, N. 2016. “The State Looks down: Some Reassessments of Kant’s Appraisal of Citizenship.” In Kant and Social Policies. Edited by A. Faggion/N. Sanchez Madrid/A. Pinzani, 25–47. London/New York.10.1007/978-3-319-42658-7_2Search in Google Scholar

Pogge, Th. 2002. “Is Kant’s Rechtslehre a ‘Comprehensive Liberalism’?” In Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: Interpretive Essays. Ed. by M. Timmons, 133–58. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Potter, N. 2002. “Kant and Capital Punishment Today.” The Journal of Value Inquiry 36(2/3), 267–82.10.1023/A:1016104603564Search in Google Scholar

Riedel, M. 1981. “Transcendental Politics? Political Legitimacy and the Concept of Civil Society in Kant.” Social Research 48(3), 588–613.Search in Google Scholar

Ripstein, A. 2009. Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA.10.4159/9780674054516Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, A. 1993. Kant’s Theory of Justice. Ithica.10.7591/9781501718717Search in Google Scholar

Shell, S. Meld. 2016. “Kant on Citizenship, Society, and Redistributive Justice.” In Kant and Social Policies. Ed. by A. Faggion/N. Sanchez Madrid/A. Pinzani, 1–24. London/New York.10.1007/978-3-319-42658-7_1Search in Google Scholar

Sieyès, E.-J. 2003. Political Writings: Including the Debate Between Sieyès and Tom Paine 1791. Indianapolis/Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, Th. 2018. “The Power of Public Positions: Official Roles in Kantian Legitimacy.” In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy 4, 28–52. Oxford.10.1093/oso/9780198813972.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

Stark, W. (ed.) 2014. Nachforschungen zu Briefen und Handschriften Immanuel Kants. Berlin.10.1524/9783050069036Search in Google Scholar

Stilz, A. 2011. “Collective Responsibility and the State.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 19(2), 190–208.10.1111/j.1467-9760.2010.00360.xSearch in Google Scholar

Uleman, J. K. 2004. “External Freedom in Kant’s Rechtslehre: Political, Metaphysical.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68(3), 578–601.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00367.xSearch in Google Scholar

Varden, H. 2009. “Kant and Dependency Relations: Kant on the State’s Right to Redistribute Resources to Protect the Rights of Dependents.” Dialogue 45(2), 257–84.10.1017/S0012217300000561Search in Google Scholar

–. 2016. “Rawls vs. Nozick vs. Kant on Domestic Economic Justice.” In Kant and Social Policies. Ed. by A. Faggion/N. Sanchez Madrid/A. Pinzani, 1–24. London/New York.10.1007/978-3-319-42658-7_5Search in Google Scholar

Weinrib, E. 2003. “Poverty and Property in Kant’s System of Rights.” Notre Dame Law Review 78, 795–828.Search in Google Scholar

Weinrib, J. 2008. “Kant on Citizenship and Universal Independence.” Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 33, 1–25.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, H. 1983. Kant’s Political Philosophy. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Williams H, S. 2006. “Kantian Justice and Poverty Relief.” Kant-Studien 95(1), 86–106.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2018. Kant on Civil Society and Welfare. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-05-27

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.11.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2020-0030/html
Scroll Up Arrow