Abstract
In its formlessness and potentiality, prime matter is a problematic entity of medieval metaphysics and its ontological limitations drastically affect human possibility of conceiving it. In this article, I analyse three influential strategies elaborated to justify an epistemic access to prime matter. They are incidental perception, negative abstraction, and analogy. Through a systematic and historical analysis of these procedures, the article shows the richness of interpretations and theoretical stakes implied by the conundrum of how prime matter can be known by human beings. In particular, the reasons behind the later medieval acceptance of analogy as the main way to unveil prime matter become clearer by pointing out the correlation between the ontological and epistemological levels of the medieval examination of prime matter.
Albert the Great 1895. De quattuor coaequaevis. Ed. by A. Borgnet. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Aristotle 1970. Physics. Trans./Comm. by W. Charlton. Oxford.10.1093/oseo/instance.00259299Search in Google Scholar
–. 1993. Metaphysics: Books Γ, Δ and Ε. Trans./Comm. by C. Kirwan. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1994. Metaphysics: Books Z and H. Trans./Comm. by D. Bostok. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2006. Metaphysics: Book Θ. Trans./Comm. by S. Makin. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2016. De anima. Trans./Comm. by C. Shields. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2018. Metaphysics: Book Iota. Trans./Comm. by L. M. Castelli. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Ashworth, E. J. 2013. “Being and Analogy”. In A Companion to Walter Burley. Ed. A. Conti. Leiden/Boston, 135–65.Search in Google Scholar
Augustine 1841. Confessiones. Ed. by J.-P. Migne. PL 32. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1864. De civitate Dei. Ed. by J.-P. Migne. PL 41. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1865. De natura boni. Ed. by J.-P. Migne. PL 42. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Averroes 1512. Commentarium magnum in Metaphysicam. Venice.Search in Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (ed.) 1991. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton.Search in Google Scholar
Blackwell, R. J./Spath R. J./Thirlkel, W. E. (trans.) 1995. Commentary on Physics. Notre Dame.Search in Google Scholar
Bonaventure 1882. Commentarius in secundum librum Sententiarum. Quaracchi.Search in Google Scholar
Brower, J. E. 2014. Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects. Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198714293.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Calcidius 2011. Commentaire au Timée de Platon. Ed. by B. Bakhouche. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2016. On Plato’s Timaeus. Ed./trans. by J. Magee. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2018. “Physics I.7”. In Aristotle’s Physics Book I: A Systematic Exploration. Ed. by D. Quarantotto. Cambridge, 178–205.10.1017/9781108181853.009Search in Google Scholar
Confucius 2008. The Analects. Trans. by R. Dawson. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Des Chenes, D. 1996. Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought. Ithaca.10.7591/9781501723711Search in Google Scholar
Francisco Suárez 1861. Disputationes metaphysicae. Vivés edition. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Friedman, R. 2021. “Is Matter the Same as Its Potency? Some Fourteenth-Century Answers”. Vivarium 59, 123–42.10.1163/15685349-12341400Search in Google Scholar
Geoffrey of Aspall 2017. Questions on Aristotle’s Physics. Ed. by S. Donati/C. Trifogli. Trans. by C. Trifogli/J. Ashworth. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Giles of Rome 1555. Hexaemeron. Rome.Search in Google Scholar
Granger, E. H. 1984. “Aristotle on Genus and Differentia”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 22/1, 1–23.10.1353/hph.1984.0001Search in Google Scholar
Grene, M. 1974. “Is Genus to Species as Matter to Form? Aristotle and Taxonomy”. Synthese 28/1, 51–69.10.1007/978-94-010-2224-8_6Search in Google Scholar
Hamesse, J. 1974. Les Auctoritates Aristotelis: un florilège médiéval. Louvain.Search in Google Scholar
Hasse, D. N. 2000. Avicenna’s De Anima in the Latin West: The Formation of a Peripatetic Philosophy of the Soul 1160–1300. London.Search in Google Scholar
John Duns Scotus 1993. Lectura in librum secundum Sententiarum. Ed. by Commissio Scotistica. Vatican City.Search in Google Scholar
Lindberg, D. C. 1981. Theories of Vision from al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago.Search in Google Scholar
Lorentz, H. 2019. “The Principles of Natural Things – Two or Three?” In Aristotle’s Physics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum. Ed. by K. Ierodiakonou/P. Kalligas/V. Karasmanis. Oxford, 262–85.10.1093/oso/9780198830993.003.0009Search in Google Scholar
McCord Adams, M. 1987. William Ockham. 2 vols. Notre Dame.Search in Google Scholar
Moro, E. 2017. Il concetto di materia in Agostino. Rome.Search in Google Scholar
Mousavian, S. N./Fink, J. L. (eds.) 2020. The Internal Senses in the Aristotelian Tradition. Cham.10.1007/978-3-030-33408-6Search in Google Scholar
Nicole Oresme 2013. Quaestiones super Physicam. Ed. by S. Caroti/J. Celeyrette/S. Kirschner/E. Mazet Leiden/Boston.Search in Google Scholar
Pasnau, R. 2011. Metaphysical Themes (1274–1671). Oxford.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567911.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Pereira, M. 2014. “Remarks on materia naturalis”. In Roger Bacon’s Communia Naturalium. A 13th Century Philosopher’s Workshop. Ed. by P. Bernardini/A. Rodolfi. Florence, 103–38.Search in Google Scholar
Petagine, A. 2019. Il fondamento positivo del mondo: Indagini francescane sulla materia all’inizio del XIV secolo. Rome.Search in Google Scholar
Plato 1960. Timaeus. Trans. by R. G. Bury. Cambridge, MA.10.1515/9781400835867-026Search in Google Scholar
Plotinus 1951. Enneads. Ed. by P. Henry/H.-R. Schwyzer. Paris/Bruxelles.Search in Google Scholar
–. 1966. Enneads. Trans. by A. H. Armstrong. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar
Polloni, N. 2020. The Twelfth-Century Renewal of Latin Metaphysics: Gundissalinus’s Ontology of Matter and Form. Toronto.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2021. “Roger Bacon on the Conceivability of Matter”. In Roger Bacon and Medieval Science and Philosophy: Studies in Honour of Jeremiah Hackett. Ed. by N. Polloni/Y. Kedar. London, 76–97.10.4324/9781003033943-5Search in Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. 2020. Calcidius on Plato’s Timaeus: Greek Philosophy, Latin Reception, and Christian Contexts. Cambridge.10.1017/9781108354745Search in Google Scholar
Rodolfi, A. 2004. Il concetto di materia nell’opera di Alberto Magno. Florence.Search in Google Scholar
Roger Bacon 1935. Questiones in VIII libros Physicorum. Ed. by F. M. Delorme. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
–. 2019. Opus tertium. Ed./trans. by N. Egel. Münster.10.28937/978-3-7873-3625-8Search in Google Scholar
Thomas Aquinas 1965. In octo libros Physicorum Aristotelis expositio. Marietti edition. Rome.Search in Google Scholar
Thomas of York 1952. Sapientiale. Ed. by C. A. Grassi. 2 vols. Toronto.Search in Google Scholar
Trifogli, C. 2017. “Geoffrey of Aspall on Matter”. In Materia: Nouvelle perspectives de recherche dans la pensée et la culture médiévales (XIIe-XVIe siècles). Ed. by T. Suarez-Nani/A. Paravicini Bagliani. Florence, 99–122.Search in Google Scholar
Van Winden, J. C. M. 1965. Calcidius on Matter: His Doctrine and Sources. Leiden.10.1163/9789004320215Search in Google Scholar
Walter Burley 1491. Expositio super libros Physicorum Aristotelis. Venice.Search in Google Scholar
William of Conches 2006. Glosae super Platonem. Ed. by É. Jeauneau. Turnhout.Search in Google Scholar
William of Ockham 1984. Summula philosophiae naturalis. Ed. by S. Brown. Saint Bonaventure, NY.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
