Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 29, 2020

Perception and Pluralism: Leibniz’s Theological Derivation of Perception in Connection with Platonism, Rationalism and Substance Monism

Gastón Robert

Abstract

This article discusses Leibniz’s claim that every substance is endowed with the property of perception in connection with Platonism, rationalism and the problem of substance monism. It is argued that Leibniz’s ascription of perception to every substance relies on his Platonic conception of finite things as imitations of God, in whom there is ‘infinite perception’. Leibniz’s Platonism, however, goes beyond the notion of imitation, including also the emanative causal relation and the logical (i.e. definitional) priority of the absolute over the limited. It is proposed that Leibniz’s endorsement of Platonism, in conjunction with some rationalist elements of his philosophy, implies a monistic conception of particulars as modifications of a single substance. Following some scholars and opposing others, the article offers evidence that Leibniz accepted this implication during the last years of his Paris period. However, it is further argued that it was precisely the idea of perception as a property of every substance that allowed Leibniz to find a way out of monism after that period. More specifically, the article defends the view that what made room for ontological pluralism within Leibniz’s rationalist and Platonic outlook was the idea that perception is the property which constitutes the very being of substances: substances are their perceptions.

Adams, R. M. 1994. Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford. Search in Google Scholar

–. 2007. “The Priority of the Perfect in the Philosophical Theologies of the Continental Rationalists”. In Rationalism, Platonism, and God (Proceedings of the British Academy 149). Ed. M. Ayers. Oxford, 91–116. Search in Google Scholar

Antognazza, M. R. 2007. “Comments on Adams”. In Rationalism, Platonism, and God (Proceedings of the British Academy 149). Ed. M. Ayers. Oxford, 117–31. Search in Google Scholar

Antognazza, M. R. 2009. Leibniz. An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge. Search in Google Scholar

–. 2015a. “Primary Matter, Primitive Passive Power, and Creaturely Limitation in Leibniz”. Studia Leibnitiana 46, 167–86. Search in Google Scholar

–. 2015b. “The Hypercategorematic Infinite”. The Leibniz Review 25, 5–30. Search in Google Scholar

Belaval, Y. 1995. Leibniz. De l’Âge classique aux Lumières. Paris. Search in Google Scholar

Berti, E. 2001. “Multiplicity and Unity of Being in Aristotle”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, vol. CI, 185–208. Search in Google Scholar

Blank, A. 2001. “Monism and Substance Pluralism in Leibniz’s Metaphysical Papers, 1675–76”. Studia Leibnitiana 33, 216–23. Search in Google Scholar

Boss, G. 1990. “L’Histoire chez Leibniz et Spinoza”. Studia Spinozana 6, 179–200 Search in Google Scholar

Broad, C. D. 1975. Leibniz. An Introduction, Cambridge, 1975. Search in Google Scholar

Brown, S. 1999. “The Proto-monadology of the De Summa Rerum”. In The Young Leibniz and his Philosophy, 1964–76. Ed. S. Brown. Dordrecht, 223–43. Search in Google Scholar

–. 1984. Leibniz. Minneapolis. Search in Google Scholar

Burgelin, P. 1959. Commentaire du Discours de Métaphysique de Leibniz. Paris. Search in Google Scholar

Cover, J. A./O’Leary-Hawthorne, J. 1999. Substance and Individuation in Leibniz. Cambridge. Search in Google Scholar

Di Bella, S. 2005. “Leibniz’s Theory of Conditions”. The Leibniz Review 15, 67–93. Search in Google Scholar

Duarte, S. 2012. “Leibniz and Monadic Domination”. In Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy (Vol. VI). Ed. D. Garber/D. Rutherford. Oxford, 210–48. Search in Google Scholar

Duncan, S. 2015. “Leibniz on the Expression of God”. Ergo 2, 83–103. Search in Google Scholar

Freudenthal, G. 1927. Spinoza: Leben und Lehre. Ed. C. Gebhardt. Heidelberg. Search in Google Scholar

Friedmann, G. 1962. Leibniz et Spinoza, Paris. Search in Google Scholar

Fouke, D. 1994. “Emanation and the Perfections of Beings: Divine Causation and the Autonomy of Nature in Leibniz”. Archiv für Geschichte die Philosophie 76, 168–94. Search in Google Scholar

Futch, M. 2008. Leibniz’s Metaphysics of Space and Time. Dordrecht. Search in Google Scholar

Garrett, D. 1990. “Truth, Method, and Correspondence in Spinoza and Leibniz”. Studia Spinozana 6, 13–44. Search in Google Scholar

Kulstad, M. 1994. “Did Leibniz Incline toward Monistic Pantheism in 1676?”. In Leibniz und Europa: VI. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress, Part I, pp. 424–428. Search in Google Scholar

Kulstad, M. (1999): “Leibniz’s De Summa Rerum. The Origin of the Variety of Things in Connection with the Spinoza-Tschirnhaus Correspondence”. In L’Actualité de Leibniz: Les Deux Labyrinthes (Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa, 34). Ed. D. Berlioz/F. Nef. Stuttgart, 69–86. Search in Google Scholar

–. 2005. “The One and the Many and Kinds of Distinctness: The Possibility of Monism or Pantheism in the Young Leibniz”. In Leibniz. Nature and Freedom. Ed. D. Rutherford/J. A. Cover. Oxford, 20–43. Search in Google Scholar

Laerke, M. 2008. Leibniz Lecteur de Spinoza. La Genèse d’une Opposition Complexe. Paris. Search in Google Scholar

–. 2010. “G. W. Leibniz’s Two Readings of the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus”. In Spinoza’s Theological-Political Treatise: A Critical Guide. Ed. Y. Melamed/M. A. Rosenthal. Cambridge, 101–27. Search in Google Scholar

–. 2018. “Leibniz’s Encounter with Spinoza’s Monism, October 1675 to February 1676”. In The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza. Ed. Michael Della Rocca. Oxford, 434–63. Search in Google Scholar

Lodge, P. (ed.) 2004. Leibniz and his Correspondents. Cambridge. Search in Google Scholar

Mercer, C. 1999. “Leibniz and Spinoza on Substance and Mode”. In The Rationalists. Ed. D. Pereboom. Lanham, MD, 273–300. Search in Google Scholar

–. 2000. “God as Both the Unity and the Multiplicity in the World”. In Unità e Molteplicità nel Pensiero Filosofico e Scientifico di Leibniz. Ed. A. Lamarra/R. Palaia. Hannover, 71–95. Search in Google Scholar

–. 2001. Leibniz’s Metaphysics: Its Origins and Development. Cambridge. Search in Google Scholar

–. 2007. “Leibniz’s Platonism and Theory of Expression”. In Forms of Platonism: From the Heritage of Ficino to the Cambridge Platonism. Florence. Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, E. 1993. “Influxus Physicus”. In Causation in Early Modern Philosophy. Cartesianism, Occasionalism and Pre-established Harmony. Ed. S. Nadler. University Park, Pennsylvania, 27–56. Search in Google Scholar

Parkinson, G. H. R. 1965. Logic and Reality in Leibniz’s Metaphysics. Oxford. Search in Google Scholar

–. 1978. “Leibniz’s Paris Writings in relation to Spinoza”. Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa, 18, 73–89. Search in Google Scholar

Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. 2014. Leibniz’s Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles. Oxford. Search in Google Scholar

Russell, B. 1937. A Critical Exposition of the Philosophy of Leibniz (2nd ed.). London. Search in Google Scholar

Rutherford, D. 1995. Leibniz’s and the Rational Order of Nature. Cambridge. Search in Google Scholar

–. 2004. “Idealism declined: Leibniz and Christian Wolff”. In Leibniz and his Correspondents. Ed. P. Lodge. Cambridge, 214–37. Search in Google Scholar

Schepers, H. 2008. “Leibniz’s Rationalism: A Plea Against Equating Soft and Strong Rationalism”. In Leibniz. What Kind of Rationalist. Ed. M. Dascal. Dordrecht,17–36. Search in Google Scholar

Schrecker, P. 1951. “Leibniz and the Timaeus”. Review of Metaphysics 4, 459–505. Search in Google Scholar

Stein, L. 1890. Leibniz und Spinoza, Berlin. Search in Google Scholar

Swoyer, C. 1995. “Leibnizian Expression”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 33, 65–99. Search in Google Scholar

Te Velde, R. A. 1995. Participation and Substantiality in Thomas Aquinas. New York. Search in Google Scholar

Whipple, J. 2010. “Leibniz on Divine Concurrence”. Philosophy Compass 5, 865–79. Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, C. 1989. Leibniz’s Metaphysics: A Comparative and Historical Study. Princeton. Search in Google Scholar

–. 1999. “Atoms, Minds, and Vortices in De Summa Rerum: Leibniz vis-à-vis Hobbes and Spinoza”. In The Young Leibniz and his Philosophy, 1964–76. Ed. S. Brown. Dordrecht, 223–243. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-02-29
Published in Print: 2020-03-01

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston