Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter September 28, 2022

Sellars’s Core Critique of C. I. Lewis: Against the Equation of Aboutness with Givenness

Griffin Klemick EMAIL logo

Abstract

Many have taken Sellars’s critique of empiricism in “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind” (EPM) to be aimed at his teacher C. I. Lewis. But if so, why do the famous arguments of its opening sections carry so little force against Lewis’s views? Understandably, some respond by denying that Lewis’s epistemology is among the positions targeted by Sellars. But this is incorrect. Indeed, Sellars had earlier offered more trenchant (if already familiar) critiques of Lewis’s epistemology. What is original about EPM is that it criticizes empiricist positions like Lewis’s not because of their foundationalism, but because of their psychologism about meaning. Since psychologism turns out to be unacceptable by Lewis’s own lights, EPM has a compelling (if implicit) critique of Lewis to offer after all, one that strikes at the heart of his philosophical system.

BonJour, L. 2004. “C. I. Lewis on the Given and Its Interpretation”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 28: 195–208.10.1111/j.1475-4975.2004.00091.xSearch in Google Scholar

Brandom, R. 2015. From Empiricism to Expressivism: Brandom Reads Sellars. Cambridge, MA.10.4159/harvard.9780674735569Search in Google Scholar

Carnap, R. 1967/[1928]. The Logical Structure of the World. Reprinted in The Logical Structure of the World & Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, 1–300. Trans. R. A. George. Berkeley/Los Angeles (original publication in 1928 in German).Search in Google Scholar

Chisholm, R. 1948. “The Problem of Empiricism”. The Journal of Philosophy, 45(19), 512–17.10.1525/9780520315167-015Search in Google Scholar

–. 1982. The Foundations of Knowing. Minneapolis.Search in Google Scholar

Dayton, E. 1995. “C. I. Lewis and the Given”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 31(2), 254–84.Search in Google Scholar

deVries, W. 2005. Wilfrid Sellars. Montreal/Kingston.10.4324/9781315712161Search in Google Scholar

deVries, W./Triplett, T. 2000. Knowledge, Mind, and the Given: Reading Wilfrid Sellars’s “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”. Indianapolis.Search in Google Scholar

Firth, R. 1964. “Coherence, Certainty, and Epistemic Priority”. The Journal of Philosophy, 61(19), 545–57.10.2307/2022933Search in Google Scholar

–. 1968. “Lewis on the Given”. In The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis, ed. by P. A. Schilpp. La Salle, 329–50.Search in Google Scholar

Gowans, C. W. 1984. “C. I. Lewis’s Critique of Foundationalism in Mind and the World-Order”. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 20(3), 241–52.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1989. “Two Concepts of the Given in C. I. Lewis: Realism and Foundationalism”. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 27(4), 573–90.10.1353/hph.1989.0097Search in Google Scholar

Hicks, M. 2020. “Sellars, Price, and the Myth of the Given”. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, 8(7), 1–16.10.15173/jhap.v8i7.4270Search in Google Scholar

Hookway, C. 2008. “Pragmatism and the Given: C. I. Lewis, Quine, and Peirce”. In The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy. Ed. by C. Misak. Oxford, 269–89.Search in Google Scholar

Hunter, B. 2016. “Clarence Irving Lewis”. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Winter 2016 edition. Ed. E. N. Zalta. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/lewis-ci/>. (First edition published in 2007.)Search in Google Scholar

Klemick, G. 2020. “C. I. Lewis was a Foundationalist After All”. History of Philosophy Quarterly 37(1), 77–99.10.2307/48595160Search in Google Scholar

Kuklick, B. 2001. A History of Philosophy in America: 1720–2000. Oxford.10.1093/0199260168.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, C. I. 1946. An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. La Salle, IL.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1952. “The Given Element in Empirical Knowledge.” Reprinted in CP, 324–30.10.2307/2182907Search in Google Scholar

–. 1956/[1929]. Mind and the World-Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. Corrected edition. New York/Dover.10.1097/00005053-193109000-00044Search in Google Scholar

–. 1968. “Replies to My Critics.” In The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis. Ed. by P. A. Schilpp. La Salle, 653–76.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1970. Collected Papers of Clarence Irving Lewis. Ed. by J. D. Goheen/J. L. Mothershead, Jr. Stanford, CA. (Citations to this work also give the original year of publication – or, if originally unpublished, of presentation – of the paper in question.)Search in Google Scholar

McDowell, J. 2009. Having the World in View. Cambridge, MA.10.2307/j.ctv1nzfgm8Search in Google Scholar

–. 1996/[1994]. Mind and World. With a new introduction. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Misak, C. 2013. The American Pragmatists. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Moser, P. K. 1988. “Foundationalism, the Given, and C. I. Lewis.” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 5(2), 189–204.Search in Google Scholar

Olen, P. 2015. “The Realist Challenge to Conceptual Pragmatism.” European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 7(2), 152–67.10.4000/ejpap.413Search in Google Scholar

O’Shea, J. R. 2007. Wilfrid Sellars: Naturalism with a Normative Turn. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2016. “Concepts of Objects as Prescribing Laws: A Kantian and Pragmatist Line of Thought.” In Pragmatism, Kant, and Transcendental Philosophy. Ed. by G. Gava/R. Stern. New York, 196–216.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2018. “The Analytic Pragmatist Conception of the A Priori: C. I. Lewis and Wilfrid Sellars”. Pragmatism and the European Traditions. Ed. by M. Baghramian/S. Marchetti. New York, 203–27.Search in Google Scholar

–. 2021. “Relocating the Myth of the Given in Lewis and Sellars”. In C. I. Lewis: The A Priori and the Given. Ed. by Q. Kammer/J.-P. Narboux/H. Wagner. New York, 195–215.10.4324/9781315204369-6Search in Google Scholar

Sachs, C. B. 2017/[2014]. Intentionality and the Myths of the Given: Between Pragmatism and Phenomenology. London/New York.Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, W. 1947a. “Epistemology and the New Way of Words”. Reprinted in PPPW, 31–46.10.2307/2019792Search in Google Scholar

–. 1947b. “Pure Pragmatics and Epistemology.” Reprinted in PPPW, 5–26.10.1086/286945Search in Google Scholar

–. 1948a. “Concepts as Involving Laws and Inconceivable without Them.” Reprinted in PPPW, 95–123.10.1086/286997Search in Google Scholar

–. 1948b. “Realism and the New Way of Words.” Reprinted in PPPW, 53–85.10.2307/2103687Search in Google Scholar

–. 1949a. “Acquaintance and Description Again”. The Journal of Philosophy 46(16), 496–504.10.2307/2020052Search in Google Scholar

–. 1949b. “Language, Rules and Behavior.” Reprinted in PPPW, 129–55.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1953a. “Inference and Meaning.” Reprinted in ISR, 3–27.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1953b. “Is There a Synthetic A Priori?” Reprinted in SPR, 298–320.10.1086/287251Search in Google Scholar

–. 1954. “Physical Realism.” Reprinted in Philosophical Perspectives: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Atascadero, CA, 7–24.10.2307/2103738Search in Google Scholar

–. 1956. “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1960. “Being and Being Known”. Reprinted in ISR, 209–28.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1963. “Phenomenalism.” Written in 1959. Reprinted in ISR, 303–49.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1975. “Autobiographical Reflections (February, 1973).” In Action, Knowledge and Reality: Studies in Honor of Wilfrid Sellars. Ed. by H.-N. Castañeda. New York, 277–93.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1980. Pure Pragmatics and Possible Worlds: The Early Essays of Wilfrid Sellars. Ed. J. Sicha. Reseda, CA.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1981a. “Foundations for a Metaphysics of Pure Process, Lecture I: The Lever of Archimedes.” Reprinted in ISR, 229–57.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1981b. “Mental Events.” Reprinted in ISR, 282–300.10.1007/BF00360342Search in Google Scholar

–. 1991/[1963]. Science, Perception, and Reality. Reprint. Atascadero, CA.Search in Google Scholar

–. 1992/[1968]. Science and Metaphysics. Reprint. Atascadero, CA. (Citations to this work include the chapter number.)Search in Google Scholar

–. 2007. In the Space of Reasons: Selected Essays of Wilfrid Sellars. Ed. by K. Scharp/R. B. Brandom. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Triplett, T. 2014. “Sellars’s Misconstrual of Defenders of the Given”. History of Philosophy Quarterly 31(1) 79–99.Search in Google Scholar

van Cleve, J. 1981. “C. I. Lewis’ Defense of Phenomenalism”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41(3), 325–32.10.2307/2107455Search in Google Scholar

Westphal, K. R. 2017. “Empiricism, Pragmatic Realism, and the A Priori in Mind and the World Order.” In Pragmatism in Transition: Contemporary Perspectives on C. I. Lewis. Ed. by P. Olen/C. Sachs. London, 169–98.10.1007/978-3-319-52863-2_8Search in Google Scholar

Williams, M. 2009. “The Tortoise and the Serpent: Sellars on the Structure of Empirical Knowledge”. In Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars. Ed. by W. deVries. Oxford, 147–85.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573301.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Zarębski, T. 2017. “Sellars and Lewis on the Given and Empirical Knowledge”. In Pragmatism in Transition: Contemporary Perspectives on C. I. Lewis. Ed. by P. Olen/C. Sachs. London, 199–217.10.1007/978-3-319-52863-2_9Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-09-28

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.12.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/agph-2021-0114/html
Scroll Up Arrow