Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access September 20, 2021

Partial migration in diadromous fishes drives the allocation of subsidies across the freshwater-marine ecotone

  • Grégoire Saboret EMAIL logo , Duncan J. Buckle , Alison J. King , Michael M. Douglas and David A. Crook
From the journal Animal Migration

Abstract

Migratory animals can act as cross-boundary subsidies sustaining ecosystem functioning, such as diadromous fishes that migrate between fresh water and seawater and carry nutrients and energy across the freshwater-marine ecotone. Frequency and timing of migration are however highly variable within and among populations. We hypothesized that in catadromous fishes (i.e., diadromous fishes that grow in freshwater and spawn in the sea, such as eels), the import of subsidies by migratory juveniles could outweigh the export of subsidies by adults due to skipped spawning migration. We used the diamond mullet Planiliza ordensis, as a model species, and determined life-history traits using a combination of length-to-age data, acoustic telemetry and otolith (fish ear stone) microchemistry. We used a mass balance approach to model individual mass acquisition and allocation, and extended our model to other life-history strategies. Our results showed high intra-population variation of migratory behaviour in P. ordensis, with few individuals migrating every year to spawn. We estimated that an individual P. ordensis acted as a net 42.6g biomass subsidy in fresh water, representing a retention of more than 50% of the juvenile mass at freshwater entry. Our model predicts that skipped spawning is likely to alter the allocation of subsidies in diadromous species, highlighting the important effects of individual variation in migratory behaviour on fluxes of energy and nutrient at ecosystem scales. We encourage future studies to consider how variation in migratory behaviour is likely to affect the direction and magnitude of biomass fluxes across ecotone boundaries.

References

[1] Loreau M, Holt RD. Spatial Flows and the Regulation of Ecosystems. Am Nat. 2004;163:606–15.10.1086/382600Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Polis GA, Wendy B. Anderson1, and, Holt RD. TOWARD AN INTEGRATION OF LANDSCAPE AND FOOD WEB ECOLOGY:The Dynamics of Spatially Subsidized Food Webs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1997;28:289–316.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.28.1.289Search in Google Scholar

[3] Takimoto G, Iwata T, Murakami M. Seasonal subsidy stabilizes food web dynamics: Balance in a heterogeneous landscape: Seasonal subsidy and food web stability. Ecol Res. 2002;17:433–9.10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00502.xSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Riggi LGA, Bommarco R. Subsidy type and quality determine direction and strength of trophic cascades in arthropod food web in agro-ecosystems. J Appl Ecol. 2019;1365-2664.13444.10.1111/1365-2664.13444Search in Google Scholar

[5] Rosenzweig ML. Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time. Sci New Ser. 1971;171:385–7.10.1126/science.171.3969.385Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Jones SE, Lennon JT. A test of the subsidy–stability hypothesis: the effects of terrestrial carbon in aquatic ecosystems. Ecology. 2015;96:1550–60.10.1890/14-1783.1Search in Google Scholar

[7] Dutton CL, Subalusky AL, Hamilton SK, Rosi EJ, Post DM. Organic matter loading by hippopotami causes subsidy overload resulting in downstream hypoxia and fish kills. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1951.10.1038/s41467-018-04391-6Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] King AJ, Tonkin Z, Lieshcke J. Short-term effects of a prolonged blackwater event on aquatic fauna in the Murray River, Australia: considerations for future events. 2012;11.10.1071/MF11275Search in Google Scholar

[9] White C, Bannister R, Dworjanyn S, Husa V, Nichols P, Dempster T. Aquaculture-derived trophic subsidy boosts populations of an ecosystem engineer. Aquac Environ Interact. 2018;10:279–89.10.3354/aei00270Search in Google Scholar

[10] Holtgrieve GW, Schindler DE. Marine-derived nutrients, bioturbation, and ecosystem metabolism: reconsidering the role of salmon in streams. Ecology. 2011;92:373–85.10.1890/09-1694.1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Bagstad KJ, Semmens DJ, Diffendorfer JE, Mattsson BJ, Dubovsky J, Thogmartin WE, et al. Ecosystem service flows from a migratory species: Spatial subsidies of the northern pintail. Ambio. 2019;48:61–73.10.1007/s13280-018-1049-4Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Naiman RJ, Bilby RE, Schindler DE, Helfield JM. Pacific Salmon, Nutrients, and the Dynamics of Freshwater and Riparian Ecosystems. Ecosystems. 2002;5:399–417.10.1007/s10021-001-0083-3Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hocking MD, Reynolds JD. Impacts of Salmon on Riparian Plant Diversity. Science. 2011;331:1609–12.10.1126/science.1201079Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Engman AC, Kwak TJ, Fischer JR. Big runs of little fish: First estimates of run size and exploitation in an amphidromous postlarvae fishery. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2021;cjfas-2020-0093.10.1139/cjfas-2020-0093Search in Google Scholar

[15] Gross MR, Coleman RM, McDowall RM. Aquatic Productivity and the Evolution of Diadromous Fish Migration. Science. 1988;239:1291–3.10.1126/science.239.4845.1291Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Augspurger JM, Warburton M, Closs GP. Life-history plasticity in amphidromous and catadromous fishes: a continuum of strategies. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2017;27:177–92.10.1007/s11160-016-9463-9Search in Google Scholar

[17] Scheuerell MD, Levin PS, Zabel RW, Williams JG, Sanderson BL. A new perspective on the importance of marine-derived nutrients to threatened stocks of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.). Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2005;62:961–4.10.1139/f05-113Search in Google Scholar

[18] Flecker A, McIntyre PB, Moore JW, Anderson JT, Taylor B, Hall R. Migratory fishes as material and process subsidies in riverine ecosystems. Am Fish Soc Symp. 2010;73:559–92.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Chapman BB, Brönmark C, Nilsson J-Å, Hansson L-A. The ecology and evolution of partial migration. Oikos. 2011;120:1764–75.10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20131.xSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Dadswell, Michael. Biology and population characteristics of the shortnose sturgeon, Acipenser brevirostrum LeSueur 1818 (Osteichthyes:Acipenseridae), in the Saint John River Estuary, New Brunswick, Canada. Can J Zool 57 2186-2210 101139z79-287. 1979;10.1139/z79-287Search in Google Scholar

[21] Jonsson B, Jonsson N. Partial migration: niche shift versus sexual maturation in fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 1993;3:348–65.10.1007/BF00043384Search in Google Scholar

[22] Haraldstad T, Höglund E, Kroglund F, Lamberg A, Olsen EM, Haugen TO. Condition-dependent skipped spawning in anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta). Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2018;75:2313–9.10.1139/cjfas-2017-0076Search in Google Scholar

[23] Crook DA, Buckle DJ, Allsop Q, Baldwin W, Saunders TM, Kyne PM, et al. Use of otolith chemistry and acoustic telemetry to elucidate migratory contingents in barramundi Lates calcarifer. Mar Freshw Res. 2016a;68:1554.10.1071/MF16177Search in Google Scholar

[24] Jørgensen C, Ernande B, Fiksen Ø, Dieckmann U. The logic of skipped spawning in fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2006;63:200–11.10.1139/f05-210Search in Google Scholar

[25] Rideout RM, Tomkiewicz J. Skipped Spawning in Fishes: More Common than You Might Think. Mar Coast Fish. 2011;3:176–89.10.1080/19425120.2011.556943Search in Google Scholar

[26] Shaw AK, Levin SA. To breed or not to breed: A model of partial migration. Oikos. 2011;120:1871–9.10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19443.xSearch in Google Scholar

[27] McBride RS, Somarakis S, Fitzhugh GR, Albert A, Yaragina NA, Wuenschel MJ, et al. Energy acquisition and allocation to egg production in relation to fish reproductive strategies. Fish Fish. 2015;16:23–57.10.1111/faf.12043Search in Google Scholar

[28] Childress ES, McIntyre PB. Life history traits and spawning behavior modulate ecosystem-level effects of nutrient subsidies from fish migrations. Ecosphere [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 18];7. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ecs2.130110.1002/ecs2.1301Search in Google Scholar

[29] Kelson SJ, Power ME, Finlay JC, Carlson SM. Partial migration alters population ecology and food chain length: evidence from a salmonid fish. Ecosphere [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 27];11. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ecs2.304410.1002/ecs2.3044Search in Google Scholar

[30] Hansen JH, Skov C, Baktoft H, Brönmark C, Chapman BB, Hulthén K, et al. Ecological Consequences of Animal Migration: Prey Partial Migration Affects Predator Ecology and Prey Communities. Ecosystems. 2020;23:292–306.10.1007/s10021-019-00402-9Search in Google Scholar

[31] Brodersen J, Ådahl E, Brönmark C, Hansson L-A. Ecosystem effects of partial fish migration in lakes. Oikos. 2008;117:40–6.10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.16118.xSearch in Google Scholar

[32] Durand J-D, Shen K-N, Chen W-J, Jamandre BW, Blel H, Diop K, et al. Systematics of the grey mullets (Teleostei: Mugiliformes: Mugilidae): molecular phylogenetic evidence challenges two centuries of morphology-based taxonomy. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012;64:73–92.10.1016/j.ympev.2012.03.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Pusey BJ, Burrows DW, Kennard MJ, Perna CN, Unmack PJ, Allsop Q, et al. Freshwater fishes of northern Australia. Zootaxa. 2017;4253:1–104.10.11646/zootaxa.4253.1.1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Bishop KA, Allen SA, Pollard DA, Cook MG. Ecological studies on the freshwater fishes of the Alligator Rivers region, Northern Territory. 1990 [cited 2017 Feb 24]; Available from: http://inis.iaea.org/Search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:22037304Search in Google Scholar

[35] Crook DA, Lacksen K, King AJ, Buckle DJ, Tickell SJ, Woodhead JD, et al. Temporal and spatial variation in strontium in a tropical river: implications for otolith chemistry analyses of fish migration. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2016b;74:533–45.10.1139/cjfas-2016-0153Search in Google Scholar

[36] Morgan DL, Unmack PJ, Beatty SJ, Ebner BC, Allen MG, Keleher JJ, et al. An overview of the ‘freshwater fishes’ of Western Australia. J R Soc West Aust. 2014;16.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Villamarín F, Magnusson WE, Jardine TD, Valdez D, Woods R, Bunn SE. Temporal Uncoupling between Energy Acquisition and Allocation to Reproduction in a Herbivorous-Detritivorous Fish. Naya DE, editor. PLOS ONE. 2016;11:e0150082.10.1371/journal.pone.0150082Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[38] Adame MF, Jardine TD, Fry B, Valdez D, Lindner G, Nadji J, et al. Estuarine crocodiles in a tropical coastal floodplain obtain nutrition from terrestrial prey. Campbell H, editor. PLOS ONE. 2018;13:e0197159.10.1371/journal.pone.0197159Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[39] Falkenberg I, Dennis T, Williams B. Organochlorine Pesticide Contamination in Three Species of Raptor and Their Prey in South Australia. Wildl Res. 1994;21:163.10.1071/WR9940163Search in Google Scholar

[40] Beesley LS, Pusey BJ, Douglas MM, Gwinn DC, Canham CA, Keogh CS, et al. New insights into the food web of an Australian tropical river to inform water resource management. Sci Rep. 2020;10:14294.10.1038/s41598-020-71331-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[41] Ward DP, Pettit NE, Adame M, Douglas MM, Setterfield SA, Bunn SE. Seasonal spatial dynamics of floodplain macrophyte and periphyton abundance in the Alligator Rivers region (Kakadu) of northern Australia: Kakadu Seasonal Dynamics of Macrophytes and Epiphytic Algae. Ecohydrology. 2016;9:1675–86.10.1002/eco.1757Search in Google Scholar

[42] Webster IT, Rea N, Padovan AV, Dostine P, Townsend SA, Cook S. An analysis of primary production in the Daly River, a relatively unimpacted tropical river in northern Australia. Mar Freshw Res. 2005;56:303.10.1071/MF04083Search in Google Scholar

[43] Gillanders BM. Otolith chemistry to determine movements of diadromous and freshwater fish. Aquat Living Resour. 2005;18:291–300.10.1051/alr:2005033Search in Google Scholar

[44] Campana SE, Thorrold SR. Otoliths, increments, and elements: keys to a comprehensive understanding of fish populations? Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2001;58:30–8.10.1139/f00-177Search in Google Scholar

[45] Kennedy BP, Klaue A, Blum JD, Folt CL, Nislow KH. Reconstructing the lives of fish using Sr isotopes in otoliths. 2002;59:5.10.1139/f02-070Search in Google Scholar

[46] Chang CW, Iizuka Y, Tzeng WN. Migratory environmental history of the grey mullet Mugil cephalus as revealed by otolith Sr:Ca ratios. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2004;269:277–88.10.3354/meps269277Search in Google Scholar

[47] Koutrakis ET, Sinis AI. Growth Analysis of Grey Mullets (pisces, Mugilidae) as Related to Age and Site. Isr J Zool. 1994;40:37–53.Search in Google Scholar

[48] von Bertalanffy L. Quantitative Laws in Metabolism and Growth. Q Rev Biol. 1957;32:217–31.10.1086/401873Search in Google Scholar

[49] Keys N, Cadbury WW. An age-height-weight study of Cantonese school boys. China Med J. 1926;40:14.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Crook DA, Wedd D, Berra TM. Analysis of otolith 87 Sr/ 86 Sr to elucidate salinity histories of Nurseryfish Kurtus gulliveri (Perciformes:Kurtidae) in a tropical lowland river in northern Australia. Freshw Sci. 2015;34:609–19.10.1086/681022Search in Google Scholar

[51] Ashworth EC, Hall NG, Hesp SA, Coulson PG, Potter IC. Age and growth rate variation influence the functional relationship between somatic and otolith size. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2016;1–13.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Campana SE. Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths: pathways, mechanisms and applications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1999;188:263–97.10.3354/meps188263Search in Google Scholar

[53] Keller K, Allsop Q, Brim Box J, Buckle D, Crook DA, Douglas MM, et al. Dry season habitat use of fishes in an Australian tropical river. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5677.10.1038/s41598-019-41287-xSearch in Google Scholar

[54] Pusey BJ, Douglas M, Olden JD, Jackson S, Allsop Q, Kennard MJ. Connectivity, habitat, and flow regime influence fish assemblage structure: Implications for environmental water management in a perennial river of the wet–dry tropics of northern Australia. 2020;15.10.1002/aqc.3347Search in Google Scholar

[55] Coggins LG, Gwinn DC, Allen MS. Evaluation of Age–Length Key Sample Sizes Required to Estimate Fish Total Mortality and Growth. Trans Am Fish Soc. 2013;142:832–40.10.1080/00028487.2013.768550Search in Google Scholar

[56] Pine WE, Pollock KH, Hightower JE, Kwak TJ, Rice JA. A Review of Tagging Methods for Estimating Fish Population Size and Components of Mortality. Fisheries. 2003;28:10–23.10.1577/1548-8446(2003)28[10:AROTMF]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[57] Hightower JE, Jackson JR, Pollock KH. Use of Telemetry Methods to Estimate Natural and Fishing Mortality of Striped Bass in Lake Gaston, North Carolina. Trans Am Fish Soc. 2001;130:557–67.10.1577/1548-8659(2001)130<0557:UOTMTE>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[58] Klinard NV, Matley JK. Living until proven dead: addressing mortality in acoustic telemetry research. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2020;30:485–99.10.1007/s11160-020-09613-zSearch in Google Scholar

[59] Welch DW, Batten SD, Ward BR. Growth, survival, and tag retention of steelhead trout (O. mykiss) surgically implanted with dummy acoustic tags. Hydrobiologia. 2007;582:289–99.10.1007/s10750-006-0553-xSearch in Google Scholar

[60] Espinoza M, Farrugia TJ, Webber DM, Smith F, Lowe CG. Testing a new acoustic telemetry technique to quantify long-term, fine-scale movements of aquatic animals. Fish Res. 2011;108:364–71.10.1016/j.fishres.2011.01.011Search in Google Scholar

[61] Therneau TM, Lumley T. Package ‘survival’. R Top Doc. 2015;128:28–33.Search in Google Scholar

[62] Wulfsohn MS, Tsiatis AA. A Joint Model for Survival and Longitudinal Data Measured with Error. Biometrics. 1997;53:330.10.2307/2533118Search in Google Scholar

[63] Ammann AJ, Michel CJ, MacFarlane RB. The effects of surgically implanted acoustic transmitters on laboratory growth, survival and tag retention in hatchery yearling Chinook salmon. Environ Biol Fishes. 2013;96:135–43.10.1007/s10641-011-9941-9Search in Google Scholar

[64] R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria; 2020. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/Search in Google Scholar

[65] McDowall RM. On size and growth in freshwater fish. Ecol Freshw Fish. 1994;3:67–79.10.1111/j.1600-0633.1994.tb00108.xSearch in Google Scholar

[66] Unmack P, Hammer M, Adams M, Hughes J, Koehn J, Kennard M, et al. Ecology of Australian Freshwater Fishes. 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[67] Burke WH, Denison RE, Hetherington EA, Koepnick RB, Nelson HF, Otto JB. Variation of seawater 87Sr/86Sr throughout Phanerozoic time. Geology. 1982;10:516–9.10.1130/0091-7613(1982)10<516:VOSSTP>2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[68] Macdonald JI, Crook DA. Variability in Sr:Ca and Ba:Ca ratios in water and fish otoliths across an estuarine salinity gradient. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2010;413:147–61.10.3354/meps08703Search in Google Scholar

[69] Chapman BB, Skov C, Hulthén K, Brodersen J, Nilsson PA, Hansson L-A, et al. Partial migration in fishes: definitions, methodologies and taxonomic distribution. J Fish Biol. 2012;81:479–99.10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03349.xSearch in Google Scholar

[70] Thomson J. The Movements and Migrations of Mullet (Mugil cephalus L.). Mar Freshw Res. 1955;6:328.Search in Google Scholar

[71] Fowler AM, Smith SM, Booth DJ, Stewart J. Partial migration of grey mullet (Mugil cephalus) on Australia’s east coast revealed by otolith chemistry. Mar Environ Res. 2016;119:238–44.10.1016/j.marenvres.2016.06.010Search in Google Scholar

[72] Jönsson KI, Jonsson KI. Capital and Income Breeding as Alternative Tactics of Resource Use in Reproduction. Oikos. 1997;78:57.10.2307/3545800Search in Google Scholar

[73] Barbier M, Loreau M. Pyramids and cascades: a synthesis of food chain functioning and stability. Young H, editor. Ecol Lett. 2019;22:405–19.10.1111/ele.13196Search in Google Scholar

[74] Uno H, Power ME. Mainstem-tributary linkages by mayfly migration help sustain salmonids in a warming river network. Ecol Lett. 2015;18:1012–20.10.1111/ele.12483Search in Google Scholar

[75] Marcarelli AM, Baxter CV, Mineau MM, Hall RO. Quantity and quality: unifying food web and ecosystem perspectives on the role of resource subsidies in freshwaters. Ecology. 2011;92:1215–25.10.1890/10-2240.1Search in Google Scholar

[76] Marczak LB, Thompson RM, Richardson JS. Meta-analysis: trophic level, habitat, and productivity shape the food web effects of resource subsidies. Ecology. 2007;88:140–8.10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[140:MTLHAP]2.0.CO;2Search in Google Scholar

[77] Perkins DM, Durance I, Jackson M, Jones JI, Lauridsen RB, Layer-Dobra K, et al. Systematic variation in food web body-size structure linked to external subsidies. Biol Lett. 2021;17:rsbl.2020.0798, 20200798.Search in Google Scholar

[78] Heintz RA, Wipfli MS, Hudson JP. Identification of Marine-Derived Lipids in Juvenile Coho Salmon and Aquatic Insects through Fatty Acid Analysis. Trans Am Fish Soc. 2010;139:840–54.10.1577/T09-115.1Search in Google Scholar

[79] Currier CM, Chaloner DT, Rüegg J, Tiegs SD, D’Amore DV, Lamberti GA. Beyond nitrogen and phosphorus subsidies: Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) as potential vectors of micronutrients. Aquat Sci. 2020;82:50.10.1007/s00027-020-00725-zSearch in Google Scholar

[80] Davis T, Kirkwood G. Age and growth studies on barramundi, Lates calcarifer (Bloch), in Northern Australia. Mar Freshw Res. 1984;35:673.10.1071/MF9840673Search in Google Scholar

[81] Roberts BH, Morrongiello JR, Morgan DL, King AJ, Saunders TM, Crook DA. Faster juvenile growth promotes earlier sex change in a protandrous hermaphrodite (barramundi Lates calcarifer). Sci Rep. 2021;11:2276.10.1038/s41598-021-81727-1Search in Google Scholar

[82] Twining CW, Palkovacs EP, Friedman MA, Hasselman DJ, Post DM. Nutrient loading by anadromous fishes: species-specific contributions and the effects of diversity. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2017;74:609–19.10.1139/cjfas-2016-0136Search in Google Scholar

[83] Jonsson N, Jonsson B. Energy allocation among developmental stages, age groups, and types of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) spawners. 2003;60:11.10.1139/f03-042Search in Google Scholar

[84] Glebe BD, Leggett WC. Latitudinal Differences in Energy Allocation and Use During the Freshwater Migrations of American Shad (Alosa sapidissima) and Their Life History Consequences. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1981;38:806–20.10.1139/f81-109Search in Google Scholar

[85] Landsman SJ, Samways KM, Hayden B, Knysh KM, Heuvel MR van den. Assimilation of marine-derived nutrients from anadromous Rainbow Smelt in an eastern North American riverine food web: evidence from stable-isotope and fatty acid analysis. Freshw Sci. 2018;37:747–59.10.1086/700598Search in Google Scholar

[86] Samways KM, Soto DX, Cunjak RA. Aquatic food-web dynamics following incorporation of nutrients derived from Atlantic anadromous fishes: nutrients from anadromous fishes. J Fish Biol. 2018;92:399–419.10.1111/jfb.13519Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[87] Schaffer WM, Elson PF. The Adaptive Significance of Variations in Life History among Local Populations of Atlantic Salmon in North America. Ecology. 1975;56:577–90.10.2307/1935492Search in Google Scholar

[88] Niemela E, Erkinaro J, Julkunen M, Hassinen E, Lansman M, Brors S. Temporal variation in abundance, return rate and life histories of previously spawned Atlantic salmon in a large subarctic river. J Fish Biol. 2006;68:1222–40.10.1111/j.0022-1112.2006.001012.xSearch in Google Scholar

[89] Moore JW, Schindler DE. Nutrient export from freshwater ecosystems by anadromous sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2004;61:1582–9.10.1139/f04-103Search in Google Scholar

[90] Moore JW, Hayes SA, Duffy W, Gallagher S, Michel CJ, Wright D. Nutrient fluxes and the recent collapse of coastal California salmon populations. Jonsson B, editor. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2011;68:1161–70.10.1139/f2011-054Search in Google Scholar

[91] Marschall EA, Mather ME, Parrish DL, Allison GW, McMenemy JR. Migration delays caused by anthropogenic barriers: modeling dams, temperature, and success of migrating salmon smolts. Ecol Appl. 2011;21:3014–31.10.1890/10-0593.1Search in Google Scholar

[92] Martins EG, Hinch SG, Patterson DA, Hague MJ, Cooke SJ, Miller KM, et al. Effects of river temperature and climate warming on stock-specific survival of adult migrating Fraser River sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka): TEMPERATURE EFFECTS ON ADULT SALMON SURVIVAL. Glob Change Biol. 2011;17:99–114.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02241.xSearch in Google Scholar

[93] Thériault V, Dunlop ES, Dieckmann U, Bernatchez L, Dodson JJ. The impact of fishing-induced mortality on the evolution of alternative life-history tactics in brook charr. Evol Appl. 2008;1:409–23.10.1111/j.1752-4571.2008.00022.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2021-04-30
Accepted: 2021-08-17
Published Online: 2021-09-20

© 2021 Grégoire Saboret et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 29.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ami-2020-0108/html
Scroll to top button