Abstract
Monarch butterflies in western North America typically migrate each fall from the Pacific Northwest to overwintering sites in California. Winter 2020/21 saw the lowest number of overwintering western monarch butterflies ever recorded, but was also marked by a winter-breeding population in the San Francisco bay area that appeared to be the largest ever seen. Recoveries of monarchs with wing tags from the Pacific Northwest suggested that many non-reproductive migrants in fall 2020 became reproductive in the San Francisco bay area and did not reach coastal overwintering sites. Mean daily maximum temperatures for San Francisco during fall and winter increased by ~1 °C during the past decade and were 2.5 °C above the 30 year mean during September-October 2020. Warm fall and winter temperatures along with the availability of non-native milkweeds likely caused the increase in winter breeding in winter 2020/21. The outcome of continued winter-breeding in the San Francisco bay area is uncertain. Whether it becomes a sink or source will be dependent on whether winter-breeding monarchs can re-enter their migratory state during spring. However, endemic levels of infection by the protozoan parasite, Ophryocystis elektroscirrha (OE), are often high in winter-breeding monarchs which can limit migration success. The eventual co-existence of winter-breeding and non-breeding monarch populations in northern and central California is probable, with an optimistic view suggesting that the adaptability of the monarch butterfly will allow it to persist in a changed environment.
References
[1] Talla V., Pierce A.A., Adams K.L, de Man T.J.B., Nallu S., Villablanca F.X., Kronforst M.R., de Roode J.C., Genomic evidence for gene flow between monarchs with divergent migratory phenotypes and flight performances, Molecular Evolution, 2020, 29, 2567-82.10.1111/mec.15508Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[2] Gustafsson K.M., Agrawal A.A., Lewenstein B.V., Wolf S.A., The monarch butterfly through time and space: The social construction of an icon, Bioscience, 2015, 65 (6), 612-22.10.1093/biosci/biv045Search in Google Scholar
[3] James D.G., James T.S., Seymour L., Kappen, L., Russell T., Harryman B., Bly C., Citizen scientist tagging reveals destinations of migrating monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.) from the Pacific Northwest, Journal of the Lepidopterists Society, 2018, 72 (2), 127-44.10.18473/lepi.v72i2.a5Search in Google Scholar
[4] James D.G., Kappen L., Further insights on the migration biology of monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) from the Pacific Northwest, Insects, 2021, 12, 161-85.10.3390/insects12020161Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[5] Crone E., Schultz C., Resilience or catastrophe? A possible state change for monarch butterflies in the west, Authorea, 2021, February 23 2021, DOI: 10.22541/au.161407616.63601022/v110.22541/au.161407616.63601022/v1Search in Google Scholar
[6] Morris G. M., Kline C., Morris S. M., Status of Danaus plexippus population in Arizona, Journal of the Lepidopterists Society, 2015, 69, 91-107.10.18473/lepi.69i2.a10Search in Google Scholar
[7] James D.G., Do some fall migrants from the Pacific Northwest augment winter breeding populations of monarch butterflies in southern California?, Journal of the Lepidopterists Society, 2018, 72 (3), 244-246.10.18473/lepi.v72i3.a11Search in Google Scholar
[8] Satterfield, D.A., Villablanca F.X., Maerz J.C., Altizer S., Migratory monarchs wintering in California experience low infection risk compared to monarchs breeding year-round on non-native milkweed, integrative and Comparative Biology, 2016, 56 (2), 343-352.10.1093/icb/icw030Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[9] Majewska, A.A., Altizer S., Exposure to non-native tropical milkweed promotes reproductive development in migratory monarch butterflies, Insects, 2019, 10, 253-70.10.3390/insects10080253Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[10] James D.G., Migration biology of the monarch butterfly in Australia, In: Malcolm S., Zalucki M.P., editors. Biology and Conservation of the Monarch Butterfly, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County; 1993. p. 189-200.Search in Google Scholar
[11] James D.G., James T.A., Migration and overwintering in Australian monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): A review with new observations and research needs, Journal of the Lepidopterists Society, 2019, 73(3), 177-90.10.18473/lepi.73i3.a7Search in Google Scholar
[12] Urquhart F.A., Urquhart N.R., Munger F., A study of a continuously breeding population of Danaus plexippus in southern California compared to a migratory population and its significance in the study of insect movement, Journal of Research on Lepidoptera, 1970, 7, 169-181.10.5962/p.333539Search in Google Scholar
[13] Goehring L., Oberhauser K.S., Effects of photoperiod, temperature and host plant age on induction of reproductive diapause and development time in Danaus plexippus., Ecological Entomology, 2002, 27, 674-85.10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00454.xSearch in Google Scholar
[14] Herman W.S., Studies on the adult reproductive diapause of the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus, Biological Bulletin, 1981, 160, 89-106.10.2307/1540903Search in Google Scholar
[15] Satterfield D.A., Maerz J.C., Altizer S., Loss of migratory behavior increases infection risk for a butterfly host, Proceedings of Royal Society B, 2015, 282, 20141734.10.1098/rspb.2014.1734Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[16] James D.G., Ovarian dormancy in Danaus plexippus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)- Oligopause not diapause, Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 1982, 21, 31-5.10.1111/j.1440-6055.1982.tb01761.xSearch in Google Scholar
[17] James D.G., Induction of reproductive dormancy in Australian monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus, Australian Journal of Zoology, 1983, 31, 497-501.10.1071/ZO9830491Search in Google Scholar
[18] James D.G., Effect of temperature on energy reserves of the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus, Australian Journal of Zoology, 1986, 34, 373-79.10.1071/ZO9860373Search in Google Scholar
[19] Altizer S.M., Oberhauser K.S., Effects of the protozoan parasite, Ophryocystis elektroscirrha on the fitness of monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus), Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 1999, 74, 76-88.10.1006/jipa.1999.4853Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Davis A.K., de Roode J.C., Effects of the parasite, Ophryocystis elektroscirrha, on wing characteristics important for migration in the monarch butterfly, Animal Migration, 2018, 5, 84-93.10.1515/ami-2018-0008Search in Google Scholar
[21] Nagano C.D., Sakai W.H., Malcolm S.B., Cockrell B.J., Donahue J.P., Brower L.P., Spring migration of monarch butterflies in California, In: Malcolm S., Zalucki M.P., editors. Biology and Conservation of the Monarch Butterfly, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County; 1993. pp. 219-32.Search in Google Scholar
[22] Brower L.P., Pyle R.M.P., The interchange of migratory monarchs between Mexico and the western United States and the importance of floral corridors to the fall and spring migrations. In: G.P. Nabhan (ed.) Conserving migratory pollinators and nectar corridors in western North America, University of Arizona Press (Tucson); 2004. pp. 144-66.Search in Google Scholar
[23] Smithers C.N., Seasonal distribution and breeding status of Danaus plexippus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in Australia, Journal of the Australian Entomological Society, 1977, 16, 175-84.10.1111/j.1440-6055.1977.tb00082.xSearch in Google Scholar
[24] James D.G., Studies on a winter breeding population of Danaus plexippus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) at Spencer, New South Wales, General and Applied Entomology, 1981, 13, 47-53.Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 David G James, published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
