Juhani Rudanko. Linking Form and Meaning: Studies on Selected Control Patterns in Recent English. Basington: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015, ix + 110 pp., 12 tables, £ 45.00.

Works Cited

De Smet, Hendrik. 2010. “English ‑ing Clauses and their Problems: The Structure of Grammatical Categories”. Linguistics 48: 1153–1193.10.1515/ling.2010.038Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2012. Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199812752.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kjellmer, Göran. 1980. “Accustomed to swim: Accustomed to swimming. On Verbal Forms after to”. In: Jens Allwood and Magnus Lund (eds.). ALVAR: A Linguistically Varied Assortment of Readings: Studies Presented to Alvar Ellegård on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday. Stockholm: University of Stockholm. 75–99.Search in Google Scholar

Mondorf, Britta. 2010. “Variation and Change in English Resultative Constructions”. Language Variation and Change 22: 397–421.10.1017/S0954394510000165Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. “Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro”. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Search in Google Scholar

Rohdenburg, Günter. 2003. “Cognitive Complexity and horror aequi as Factors Determining the Use of Interrogative Clause Linkers in English”. In: Rohdenburg and Mondorf (eds.). 205–249.10.1515/9783110900019.205Search in Google Scholar

Rohdenburg, Günter. 2006. “The Role of Functional Constraints in the Evolution of the English Complementation System”. In: Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt and Herbert Schendl (eds.). Syntax, Style and Grammatical Norms: English from 1500–2000. Bern etc.: Lang. 143–166.Search in Google Scholar

Rohdenburg, Günter. 2016. “On the Differential Evolution of Simple and Complex Object Constructions in English”. In: Hubert Cuyckens, Hendrik De Smet, Liesbet Heyvaert and Charlotte Maekelberghe (eds.). Explorations in English Historical Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Rohdenburg, Günter and Britta Mondorf (eds.). 2003. Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110900019Search in Google Scholar

Rudanko, Juhani. 2012. “Exploring Aspects of the Great Complement Shift, with Evidence from the TIME Corpus and COCA”. In: Terttu Nevalainen and Elizabeth Traugott (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 222–232.Search in Google Scholar

Rudanko, Juhani and Paul Rickman. 2014. “Null Objects and Sentential Complements, with Evidence from the Corpus of Historical American English”. In: Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière and Lieven Vandelanotte (eds.). Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 209–221.Search in Google Scholar

Sag, Ivan and Karl Pollard. 1991. “An Integrated Theory of Complement Control”. Language 67: 63–113.10.2307/415539Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts”. Language in Society 5: 1–23.10.1017/S0047404500006837Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609213Search in Google Scholar

Vosberg, Uwe. 2003. “The Role of Extractions and horror aequi in the Evolution of ‑ing Complements in Modern English”. In: Rohdenburg and Mondorf (eds.). 305–327.10.1515/9783110900019.305Search in Google Scholar

Vosberg, Uwe. 2006. Die Große Komplementverschiebung: Außersemantische Einflüsse auf die Entwicklung satzwertiger Ergänzungen im Neuenglischen. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar