Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 15, 2019

Permeable Boundaries: Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year (1722) and Jurij M. Lotman’s Semiosphere

Nicole Falkenhayner
From the journal Anglia

Abstract

This article argues that the cultural semiotic model of the “semiosphere” by Lotman (Lotman, Grishakova and Clark 2009) can be productively employed to interpret the complex layers of social order and liminal sociality in Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year (1722). Defoe’s text, analysed with a cultural semiotic approach, appears as more than a shocking re-narration of a historical event, as it becomes possible to read this proto-novel as a text that showcases and makes experiential the entanglement of social breakdown and social needs. London during the plague is shown as a space that labours to enforce both discursive as well as physical borders, but fails in both instances: The lively media public which Defoe depicts for the mid-17th century is shown as failing to establish boundaries of ‘facts’ and ‘fake news’, while single human beings constantly defy the shutting orders of the authorities, or flee the city illegally. In the semiosphere of a London constituted by a state of exception, Defoe strategically inserts permeable boundaries to show a survival of conviviality in the face of the breakdown of society. The main topoi of Lotman’s cultural semiotic model – explosion and periphery – illustrate both the discursive disorientation during the plague as well as the spatial peripheries of the city as sites of liminal social survival in the face of catastrophe.

Works Cited

Agamben, Giorgio and Daniel Heller-Roazen. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Alker, Sharon and Holly F. Nelson. 2015. “(Re)Writing Spaces of War: Daniel Defoe and Early Modern Siege Narratives”. In: Katherine Ellison, Kit Kincaid and Holly F. Nelson (eds.). Topographies of the Imagination: New Approaches to Daniel Defoe. New York: AMS Press. 209–234. Search in Google Scholar

Berensmeyer, Ingo. 2007. Angles of Contingency: Literarische Kultur im England des 17. Jahrhunderts. Berlin: de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Defoe, Daniel. 1722/2010. A Journal of the Plague Year. Eds. Louis Landa and David Roberts. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

DeGabriele, Peter. 2015. Sovereign Power and the Enlightenment: Eighteenth-Century Literature and the Problem of the Political. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Esposito, Elena. 2007. Die Fiktion der wahrscheinlichen Realität. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Search in Google Scholar

Evelyn, John and Samuel Pepys. 1973. Selections from the Diaries of John Evelyn and Samuel Pepys. Ed. James Gibson. London: Chatto & Windus Education. Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1979. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. Search in Google Scholar

Frank, Susi K., Cornelia Ruhe and Alexander Schmitz (eds.). 2012. Explosion und Peripherie: Jurij Lotmans Semiotik der kulturellen Dynamik revisited. Bielefeld: transcript. Search in Google Scholar

Hodges, Nathaniel and John Quincy. 1720. Loimologia. 2nd ed. London: Bell. Search in Google Scholar

Korte, Barbara. 2016. “Early-Modern Diversity: The Origins of the English Short Fiction”. In: Dominic Head (ed.). The Cambridge History of the English Short Story. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 16–31. Search in Google Scholar

Lachmann, Renate. 2012. “Jurij Lotman: Die vorexplosive Phase”. In: Susi K. Frank, Cornelia Ruhe and Alexander Schmitz (eds.). Explosion und Peripherie: Jurij Lotmans Semiotik der kulturellen Dynamik revisited. Bielefeld: transcript. 97–118. Search in Google Scholar

Lotman, Jurij M. 2009. Culture and Explosion. Eds. Marina Grischakova and Wilma Clark. Berlin: de Gruyter. Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, Robert. 1990. “The Reception of a Journal of the Plague Year and the Nexus of Fiction and History in the Novel”. ELH 57.3: 529–555. Search in Google Scholar

McDowell, Paula. 2006. “Defoe and the Contagion of the Oral: Modelling Media Shift in ‘A Journal of the Plague Year’”. PMLA 121.1: 87–106. Search in Google Scholar

McKinley, Alan. 2009. “Foucault, Plague, Defoe”. Culture and Organization 15.2: 167–184. Search in Google Scholar

Moote, A. Lloyd and Dorothy C. Moote. 2004. The Great Plague: The Story of London’s Most Deadly Year. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Novak, Maximilian E. 2001. Daniel Defoe: Master of Fictions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Payne, Geoffrey. 2014. “Distemper, Scourge, Invader: Discourse and Plague in Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year”. English Studies 95.6: 620–636. Search in Google Scholar

Richetti, John. 2008. “Defoe as Narrative Innovator”. In: John Richetti (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Daniel Defoe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 121–138. Search in Google Scholar

Vincent, Thomas. 1667. Gods Terrible Voice in the City of London. EEBO Early English books online, Chadwyck-Healy (ProQuest) < https://eebo.chadwyck.com/> [accessed 27 April 2018]. Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Raymond. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-03-15
Published in Print: 2019-03-14

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston