Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 23, 2020

The Document as Epistemic Object: Notes on Archival Knowledge Cultures

  • Alexander Starre EMAIL logo
From the journal Anglia

Abstract

This article strategically resituates scholarly engagement with archival documents within the media ecology and the epistemic culture that sustains literary and cultural studies, noting affinities between historical and contemporary configurations as well as between theoretical and medial-material dimensions of archives. Based on current debates on the growing relevance of archival documents in American Studies and adjacent fields, it stakes out a framework that leans on recent work in a small branch of contemporary literary theory focused on historical epistemology, especially with regard to the notion of ‘epistemic objects’. Engaging these theoretical concerns, the article discusses concrete archival collections and documents, including letters by the novelist Willa Cather and items from a capacious archive documenting the emergence and evolution of Andrew Carnegie’s public library philanthropy. I outline several ways in which the shape and the aesthetics of such archives embody the information economies and epistemic situations of the past – in this case, the formative period around 1900. Finally, the article addresses the digital document overload that confronts the contemporary researcher and comments on the emerging archival knowledge culture of today’s humanities.

Works Cited

Acocella, Joan. 2013. “What’s in Cather’s Letters”. The New Yorker, 9 April. <https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/whats-in-cathers-letters> [accessed 15 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar

Acocella, Joan Ross. 2000. Willa Cather and the Politics of Criticism. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar

Albrecht, Andrea et al. 2016. “Zum Konzept Historischer Epistemologie”. Scientia Poetica 20.1: 137. 10.1515/scipo-2016-0108Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Tony. 2010. “Sociology, Aesthetics, Expertise”. New Literary History 41.2: 253–276. Search in Google Scholar

Berlant, Lauren Gail. 1997. The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv120qtf2Search in Google Scholar

Bertram, James. 1907. Letter to Clara B. McJunkin. 25 January. CCNY. II. A.1. Reel 4.Search in Google Scholar

Bertram, James. 1908. Letter to Dr. Ed. R. Miller. 15 February. CCNY. II. A.1. Reel 17.Search in Google Scholar

Bertram, James. 1916. Notes on the Erection of Library Bildings. Carnegie Corporation of New York Archives, Columbia University, New York. VIII. A.3. Box 1.Search in Google Scholar

Bérubé, Michael. 2005. “Introduction: Engaging the Aesthetic”. In: The Aesthetics of Cultural Studies: An Introduction. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 1–27.10.1002/9780470774182.chSearch in Google Scholar

Blair, Ann. 2010. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Burton, Antoinette M. (ed.). 2005. Archive Stories: Facts, Fictions, and the Writing of History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822387046Search in Google Scholar

Caswell, Michelle. 2016. “‘The Archive’ Is Not an Archives: On Acknowledging the Intellectual Contributions of Archival Studies”. Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture 16.1. <https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7bn4v1fk#main> [accessed 15 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar

Cather, Willa. 2013. The Selected Letters of Willa Cather. Eds. Andrew Jewell and Janis P. Stout. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Search in Google Scholar

Cordell, Ryan. 2016. “A Larger View of Digital American Studies”. Amerikastudien/American Studies 61.3: 397–403.Search in Google Scholar

Cvetkovich, Ann. 2003. An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822384434Search in Google Scholar

Daston, Lorraine (ed.). 2017. Science in the Archives: Pasts, Presents, Futures. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226432533.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Deloria, Philip Joseph and Alexander I. Olson. 2017. American Studies: A User’s Guide. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520962699Search in Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1995. “Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression”. Trans. Eric Prenowitz. Diacritics 25.2: 9–63.10.2307/465144Search in Google Scholar

Ernst, Wolfgang. 2015. Stirrings in the Archives: Order from Disorder. Lanham, ML: Rowman and Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar

Gililand, Anne J., Sue McKemmish and Andrew J. Lau. 2017. Research in the Archival Multiverse. Melbourne: Monash University Press.10.26530/OAPEN_628143Search in Google Scholar

Gitelman, Lisa. 2014. Paper Knowledge: Toward a Media History of Documents. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11smg09Search in Google Scholar

Guillory, John. 2004. “The Memo and Modernity”. Critical Inquiry 31.1: 108–132. 10.1086/427304Search in Google Scholar

Hartman, Saidiya V. 2007. Lose Your Mother: A Journey Along the Atlantic Slave Route. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Hartman, Saidiya V. 2019. Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments. London: Serpent’s Tail.Search in Google Scholar

Hayles, N. Katherine. 2012. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226321370.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hyde, Carrie and Joseph Rezek. 2014. “Introduction: The Aesthetics of Archival Evidence”. J19: The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists 2.1: 155–162. 10.1353/jnc.2014.0011Search in Google Scholar

Internet Archive. “About the Internet Archive”. Archive.org, n. d. <https://archive.org/about/> [accessed 30 September 2019].Search in Google Scholar

Kindley, Evan. 2011. “Big Criticism”. Critical Inquiry 38.1: 71–95. 10.1086/661644Search in Google Scholar

Kindley, Evan. 2013. “Response to Jeffrey J. Williams”. Critical Inquiry 39.2: 412–418. 10.1086/668532Search in Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levine, Caroline. 2015. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400852604Search in Google Scholar

Lison, Andrew et al. 2019. Archives. Minneapolis, MN: meson press/University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lison, Andrew. 2019. “Introduction: Contesting ‘The Archive,’ Archives, and Thanatarchy”. In: Andrew Lison et al. Archives. Minneapolis, MN: meson press/University of Minnesota Press. ix-xxiii. Search in Google Scholar

Love, Heather. 2007. Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Martus, Steffen. 2015. “Epistemische Dinge der Literaturwissenschaft?” In: Andrea Albrecht et al. (eds.). Theorien, Methoden und Praktiken des Interpretierens. Berlin: De Gruyter. 23–51.10.1515/9783110353983.23Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, Ruth and Alexander Starre. 2018. “Media/Knowledge: American(Ist) Epistemic Formats 1900/2000”. In: Alexander Starre and Frank Kelleter (eds.). Projecting American Studies: Essays on Theory, Method, and Practice. Heidelberg: Winter. 273–285.Search in Google Scholar

O’Brien, Sharon. 1984. “‘The Thing Not Named’: Willa Cather as a Lesbian Writer”. Signs 9.4: 576–599.10.1086/494088Search in Google Scholar

Prelinger, Rick. 2019. “Archives of Inconvenience”. In: Andrew Lison et al. Archives. Minneapolis, MN: meson press/University of Minnesota Press. ix-xxiii. 1–45.Search in Google Scholar

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2010 a. An Epistemology of the Concrete: Twentieth-Century Histories of Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv11qdxmcSearch in Google Scholar

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2010 b. On Historicizing Epistemology: An Essay. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schrock, Andrew. 2019. “Who Else Has a Folder Titled Something Like “to Read Now” Full of PDFs That They Will Not Actually Read Now?” Twitter. 5 September, 3:04 am. <https://twitter.com/aschrock/status/1169415953588740098> [accessed 15 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar

Sina, Kai and Carlos Spoerhase. 2017 a. “‘Gemachtwordenheit’: Über diesen Band”. In: Kai Sina and Carlos Spoerhase (eds.). Nachlassbewusstsein: Literatur, Archiv, Philologie, 1750–2000. Göttingen: Wallstein. 7–20.Search in Google Scholar

Sina, Kai and Carlos Spoerhase (eds.). 2017 b. Nachlassbewusstsein: Literatur, Archiv, Philologie, 1750–2000. Göttingen: Wallstein. Search in Google Scholar

Singh, Julietta. 2018. No Archive Will Restore You. Santa Barbara, CA: Punctum Books.Search in Google Scholar

Starre, Alexander. 2015. Metamedia: American Book Fictions and Literary Print Culture after Digitization. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.10.2307/j.ctt20p58m9Search in Google Scholar

Starre, Alexander. 2016. “Building Knowledge: Carnegie Libraries as Epistemic Spaces”. In: Christian Kloeckner, Simone Knewitz and Sabine Sielke (eds.). Knowledge Landscapes North America. Heidelberg: Winter. 67–84.Search in Google Scholar

Steedman, Carolyn. 2001. “Something She Called a Fever: Michelet, Derrida, and Dust”. The American Historical Review 106.4: 1159–1180. 10.2307/2692943Search in Google Scholar

Stoler, Ann Laura. 2009. Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400835478Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Jeffrey J. 2013. “The Little Magazine and the Theory Journal: A Response to Evan Kindley’s ‘Big Criticism’”. Critical Inquiry 39.2: 402–411. 10.1086/668531Search in Google Scholar

Yale, Elizabeth. 2015. “The History of Archives: The State of the Discipline”. Book History 18.1: 332–359. 10.1353/bh.2015.0007Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-09-23
Published in Print: 2020-09-15

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.2.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ang-2020-0036/html
Scroll Up Arrow