Abstract
This article strategically resituates scholarly engagement with archival documents within the media ecology and the epistemic culture that sustains literary and cultural studies, noting affinities between historical and contemporary configurations as well as between theoretical and medial-material dimensions of archives. Based on current debates on the growing relevance of archival documents in American Studies and adjacent fields, it stakes out a framework that leans on recent work in a small branch of contemporary literary theory focused on historical epistemology, especially with regard to the notion of ‘epistemic objects’. Engaging these theoretical concerns, the article discusses concrete archival collections and documents, including letters by the novelist Willa Cather and items from a capacious archive documenting the emergence and evolution of Andrew Carnegie’s public library philanthropy. I outline several ways in which the shape and the aesthetics of such archives embody the information economies and epistemic situations of the past – in this case, the formative period around 1900. Finally, the article addresses the digital document overload that confronts the contemporary researcher and comments on the emerging archival knowledge culture of today’s humanities.
Works Cited
Acocella, Joan. 2013. “What’s in Cather’s Letters”. The New Yorker, 9 April. <https://www.newyorker.com/books/page-turner/whats-in-cathers-letters> [accessed 15 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Acocella, Joan Ross. 2000. Willa Cather and the Politics of Criticism. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar
Albrecht, Andrea et al. 2016. “Zum Konzept Historischer Epistemologie”. Scientia Poetica 20.1: 137. 10.1515/scipo-2016-0108Search in Google Scholar
Bennett, Tony. 2010. “Sociology, Aesthetics, Expertise”. New Literary History 41.2: 253–276. Search in Google Scholar
Berlant, Lauren Gail. 1997. The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv120qtf2Search in Google Scholar
Bertram, James. 1907. Letter to Clara B. McJunkin. 25 January. CCNY. II. A.1. Reel 4.Search in Google Scholar
Bertram, James. 1908. Letter to Dr. Ed. R. Miller. 15 February. CCNY. II. A.1. Reel 17.Search in Google Scholar
Bertram, James. 1916. Notes on the Erection of Library Bildings. Carnegie Corporation of New York Archives, Columbia University, New York. VIII. A.3. Box 1.Search in Google Scholar
Bérubé, Michael. 2005. “Introduction: Engaging the Aesthetic”. In: The Aesthetics of Cultural Studies: An Introduction. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. 1–27.10.1002/9780470774182.chSearch in Google Scholar
Blair, Ann. 2010. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Burton, Antoinette M. (ed.). 2005. Archive Stories: Facts, Fictions, and the Writing of History. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822387046Search in Google Scholar
Caswell, Michelle. 2016. “‘The Archive’ Is Not an Archives: On Acknowledging the Intellectual Contributions of Archival Studies”. Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture 16.1. <https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7bn4v1fk#main> [accessed 15 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Cather, Willa. 2013. The Selected Letters of Willa Cather. Eds. Andrew Jewell and Janis P. Stout. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Search in Google Scholar
Cordell, Ryan. 2016. “A Larger View of Digital American Studies”. Amerikastudien/American Studies 61.3: 397–403.Search in Google Scholar
Cvetkovich, Ann. 2003. An Archive of Feelings: Trauma, Sexuality, and Lesbian Public Cultures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822384434Search in Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine (ed.). 2017. Science in the Archives: Pasts, Presents, Futures. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226432533.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Deloria, Philip Joseph and Alexander I. Olson. 2017. American Studies: A User’s Guide. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520962699Search in Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1995. “Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression”. Trans. Eric Prenowitz. Diacritics 25.2: 9–63.10.2307/465144Search in Google Scholar
Ernst, Wolfgang. 2015. Stirrings in the Archives: Order from Disorder. Lanham, ML: Rowman and Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar
Gililand, Anne J., Sue McKemmish and Andrew J. Lau. 2017. Research in the Archival Multiverse. Melbourne: Monash University Press.10.26530/OAPEN_628143Search in Google Scholar
Gitelman, Lisa. 2014. Paper Knowledge: Toward a Media History of Documents. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11smg09Search in Google Scholar
Guillory, John. 2004. “The Memo and Modernity”. Critical Inquiry 31.1: 108–132. 10.1086/427304Search in Google Scholar
Hartman, Saidiya V. 2007. Lose Your Mother: A Journey Along the Atlantic Slave Route. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar
Hartman, Saidiya V. 2019. Wayward Lives, Beautiful Experiments. London: Serpent’s Tail.Search in Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine. 2012. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226321370.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Hyde, Carrie and Joseph Rezek. 2014. “Introduction: The Aesthetics of Archival Evidence”. J19: The Journal of Nineteenth-Century Americanists 2.1: 155–162. 10.1353/jnc.2014.0011Search in Google Scholar
Internet Archive. “About the Internet Archive”. Archive.org, n. d. <https://archive.org/about/> [accessed 30 September 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Kindley, Evan. 2011. “Big Criticism”. Critical Inquiry 38.1: 71–95. 10.1086/661644Search in Google Scholar
Kindley, Evan. 2013. “Response to Jeffrey J. Williams”. Critical Inquiry 39.2: 412–418. 10.1086/668532Search in Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Levine, Caroline. 2015. Forms: Whole, Rhythm, Hierarchy, Network. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400852604Search in Google Scholar
Lison, Andrew et al. 2019. Archives. Minneapolis, MN: meson press/University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lison, Andrew. 2019. “Introduction: Contesting ‘The Archive,’ Archives, and Thanatarchy”. In: Andrew Lison et al. Archives. Minneapolis, MN: meson press/University of Minnesota Press. ix-xxiii. Search in Google Scholar
Love, Heather. 2007. Feeling Backward: Loss and the Politics of Queer History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Martus, Steffen. 2015. “Epistemische Dinge der Literaturwissenschaft?” In: Andrea Albrecht et al. (eds.). Theorien, Methoden und Praktiken des Interpretierens. Berlin: De Gruyter. 23–51.10.1515/9783110353983.23Search in Google Scholar
Mayer, Ruth and Alexander Starre. 2018. “Media/Knowledge: American(Ist) Epistemic Formats 1900/2000”. In: Alexander Starre and Frank Kelleter (eds.). Projecting American Studies: Essays on Theory, Method, and Practice. Heidelberg: Winter. 273–285.Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon. 1984. “‘The Thing Not Named’: Willa Cather as a Lesbian Writer”. Signs 9.4: 576–599.10.1086/494088Search in Google Scholar
Prelinger, Rick. 2019. “Archives of Inconvenience”. In: Andrew Lison et al. Archives. Minneapolis, MN: meson press/University of Minnesota Press. ix-xxiii. 1–45.Search in Google Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2010 a. An Epistemology of the Concrete: Twentieth-Century Histories of Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 10.2307/j.ctv11qdxmcSearch in Google Scholar
Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2010 b. On Historicizing Epistemology: An Essay. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Schrock, Andrew. 2019. “Who Else Has a Folder Titled Something Like “to Read Now” Full of PDFs That They Will Not Actually Read Now?” Twitter. 5 September, 3:04 am. <https://twitter.com/aschrock/status/1169415953588740098> [accessed 15 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Sina, Kai and Carlos Spoerhase. 2017 a. “‘Gemachtwordenheit’: Über diesen Band”. In: Kai Sina and Carlos Spoerhase (eds.). Nachlassbewusstsein: Literatur, Archiv, Philologie, 1750–2000. Göttingen: Wallstein. 7–20.Search in Google Scholar
Sina, Kai and Carlos Spoerhase (eds.). 2017 b. Nachlassbewusstsein: Literatur, Archiv, Philologie, 1750–2000. Göttingen: Wallstein. Search in Google Scholar
Singh, Julietta. 2018. No Archive Will Restore You. Santa Barbara, CA: Punctum Books.Search in Google Scholar
Starre, Alexander. 2015. Metamedia: American Book Fictions and Literary Print Culture after Digitization. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.10.2307/j.ctt20p58m9Search in Google Scholar
Starre, Alexander. 2016. “Building Knowledge: Carnegie Libraries as Epistemic Spaces”. In: Christian Kloeckner, Simone Knewitz and Sabine Sielke (eds.). Knowledge Landscapes North America. Heidelberg: Winter. 67–84.Search in Google Scholar
Steedman, Carolyn. 2001. “Something She Called a Fever: Michelet, Derrida, and Dust”. The American Historical Review 106.4: 1159–1180. 10.2307/2692943Search in Google Scholar
Stoler, Ann Laura. 2009. Along the Archival Grain: Epistemic Anxieties and Colonial Common Sense. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400835478Search in Google Scholar
Williams, Jeffrey J. 2013. “The Little Magazine and the Theory Journal: A Response to Evan Kindley’s ‘Big Criticism’”. Critical Inquiry 39.2: 402–411. 10.1086/668531Search in Google Scholar
Yale, Elizabeth. 2015. “The History of Archives: The State of the Discipline”. Book History 18.1: 332–359. 10.1353/bh.2015.0007Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
